Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-p2mp-loose-path-reopt

"Zafar Ali (zali)" <> Mon, 03 October 2016 19:29 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD533129424; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 12:29:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.516
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.516 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F97FmGmacK6z; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 12:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15EEE1294DD; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 12:29:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=12593; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1475522989; x=1476732589; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=nIP798cKCrMmnzvNFtsTJAGJPBorWbvae6WLeWel8/g=; b=IEZEJAQFSoQ5sbLmzRLJEuC+PzdqIr4/qBsrOn9O7jwYf7y7lqxIHtTK PfF+oYy3jumnr6GjDPlB2zHVejxfXORbrsZYlx2ffRoU83wb4rRP1tq2i v+zstD7mExdCXd+/Wxd7eevyKTuD3uyCxYS9LoaQ1aA4unGiEYnzFOZMZ s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,291,1473120000"; d="scan'208,217";a="331158831"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Oct 2016 19:29:47 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u93JTltr006217 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 3 Oct 2016 19:29:47 GMT
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 15:29:46 -0400
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 15:29:46 -0400
From: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <>
To: "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <>, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <>, "Tarek Saad (tsaad)" <>, "" <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-p2mp-loose-path-reopt
Thread-Index: AQHSHKhvNzwis1UUqUerkB0kcNW2fKCW7qAAgAAxAYA=
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 19:29:46 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D418299318F996zaliciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-p2mp-loose-path-reopt
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 19:29:53 -0000

Dear Pavan and WG:

My response is same as Rakesh's response.

Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft.  Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules.


Regards ... Zafar

From: "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <<>>
Date: Monday, October 3, 2016 at 8:34 AM
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <<>>, "Tarek Saad (tsaad)" <<>>, zali <<>>, "<>" <<>>, "<>" <<>>
Cc: "<>" <<>>, TEAS WG Chairs <<>>
Subject: Re: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-p2mp-loose-path-reopt

Hi Pavan, WG,

Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft.  Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules.


From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <<>>
Date: Sunday, October 2, 2016 at 8:28 AM
To: "Tarek Saad (tsaad)" <<>>, RAKESH GANDHI <<>>, Zafar Ali <<>>, "<>" <<>>, "<>" <<>>
Cc: "<>" <<>>, TEAS WG Chairs <<>>
Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-p2mp-loose-path-reopt

Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of the preparation for WG Last Call

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above

Thank you,
TEAS WG Chairs

PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your