Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-06.txt

Adrian Farrel <> Sun, 25 April 2021 19:47 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F0273A0A69; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 12:47:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.803
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.803 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MAY_BE_FORGED=2.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZZ5m2XhkfxqP; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 12:47:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A55A83A0A5E; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 12:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 13PJlZOx004040; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 20:47:35 +0100
Received: from (unknown []) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EBC922044; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 20:47:35 +0100 (BST)
Received: from (unknown []) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 492D622042; Sun, 25 Apr 2021 20:47:35 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ( [] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 13PJlYlR012409 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 25 Apr 2021 20:47:34 +0100
Reply-To: <>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <>
To: "'Jeong-dong Ryoo'" <>, <>, "'Vishnu Pavan Beeram'" <>
Cc: "'TEAS WG Chairs'" <>
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 20:47:34 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <099501d73a0b$d6d58e10$8480aa30$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQCcYLxEFCwFoPA3CgG1JohUuJ+qKQHmTvjorSwhP5A=
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-
X-TM-AS-Result: No--11.878-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--11.878-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Result: 10--11.877700-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: dL10VBB8yodor4mPA3EMtnFPUrVDm6jtlFGUu7DBzhhQKAQSutQYXDwD GrXuzHSkeG/tRkLoURcDE68T0M4UjzeiGq2NlS7FawF+mgcxqmUZskwWqoib3IbY4t4Fw8BRKuY UNhe5JQwD+h7g3AV/amXOc5xUbKQ1y1t1R4gB7taFTLRMAFrHXLq5gapsvWFSkBOGnT08+PPzWh IpvgX1cBDqBjBbBcmVCSP2yg+Ty9M96lGguw/2wgxxIOrYW0TsfrTt+hmA5bKd5bO+3Wz2iN0mb sETpNKhTfA9Ujkfba0g+nnDURw8P1aJYTHKc+QOcjLMMEdbK+tMGTMF+LRLanJJhm3A0BYf88Pc KqOpBmYLg54fWmT6Spqt6U4pqlIoXe+qjhh1uXixlpnlQFCyh7//aL8aU7yAYxDgISSqWZ5kIer VGHLu6NpB5IOXblRXP70MlkYPhZxqh+ZwiDQlS2pno6KlGnd6pHTu027282O/md2adk3dRFa9FH 7aBqMzzfxJm2MUrHp6diZPg6AlPu5jY600yNNTB89GKHo03nZXsnWs5YyG5sHx9l2YYLoQFgPYR rc+i2TnzlXMYw4XMOYv5V7WeGfsC24oEZ6SpSkj80Za3RRg8JmXZ7M6z0KkwirdXLBUcVbFS7RG /zxwMeVj7YsRwtrIOiBUDD2CVOg=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-06.txt
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 19:47:49 -0000


I'm happy with this revision. Thanks to the authors for the work.


-----Original Message-----
From: Teas <> On Behalf Of Jeong-dong Ryoo
Sent: 25 April 2021 06:07
To:; Vishnu Pavan Beeram <>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <>
Subject: Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-06.txt

Dear TEAS WG Chairs and participants, 

A new version of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp has been uploaded. 

The authors of this draft believe that all the comments from Adrian raised during the WG Last Call have been resolved. 

A DIFF is available at:

If you have any further comments or feedback, please let us know. 
Otherwise, we would be grateful if the WG Chairs could take this document to the next step.

Best Regards, 

Jeong-dong (on behalf of co-authors)

-----Original Message-----
From:  "" <>
To:      <>rg>; 
Cc:      <>rg>; 
Sent:  2021-04-25 (일) 13:27:06 (UTC+09:00)
Subject: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-06.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling WG of the IETF.

        Title           : GMPLS Signaling Extensions for Shared Mesh Protection
        Authors         : Jia He
                          Italo Busi
                          Jeong-dong Ryoo
                          Bin Yeong Yoon
                          Peter Park
	Filename        : draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-signaling-smp-06.txt
	Pages           : 12
	Date            : 2021-04-24

   ITU-T Recommendation G.808.3 defines the generic aspects of a Shared
   Mesh Protection (SMP) mechanism, where the difference between SMP and
   Shared Mesh Restoration (SMR) is also identified.  ITU-T
   Recommendation G.873.3 defines the protection switching operation and
   associated protocol for SMP at the Optical Data Unit (ODU) layer.
   RFC 7412 provides requirements for any mechanism that would be used
   to implement SMP in a Multi-Protocol Label Switching - Transport
   Profile (MPLS-TP) network.

   This document updates RFC 4872 to provide the extensions to the
   Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) signaling to
   support the control of the SMP.

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:

There are also htmlized versions available at:

A diff from the previous version is available at:

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:

Teas mailing list

Teas mailing list