Re: [Teas] Regardig IPR on draft-ietf-teas-te-metric-recording

Clarence Filsfils <cfilsfil@cisco.com> Mon, 19 October 2015 10:37 UTC

Return-Path: <cfilsfil@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 874C71A88E3; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 03:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RZ0Sz1CbLn7P; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 03:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37EAF1A889A; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 03:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3074; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1445251034; x=1446460634; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3ZYJNTiN4AyBTrg48MmPXEdu7Y+BI79fPUYjXF38j8I=; b=Vp5BkiXy7dPqDc+fFYg9F8SL0wmr37fo9tLRxvEk7clUducyL9z43ldi 4rrGjrOG2IuOGgjNy0BEGgjo+TqMk6KPGWqfOK0Yz32eiXIZK0hUMTrvY F5HVigHgZH4WGLSGCFmk0DYtPf9ebOWl+yM8wfAtwOTkSbj16BUWE5/vl U=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,701,1437436800"; d="scan'208";a="605798256"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Oct 2015 10:37:12 +0000
Received: from [10.61.218.237] ([10.61.218.237]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9JAbCIr011117; Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:37:12 GMT
Message-ID: <5624AC96.3090509@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:40:54 +0200
From: Clarence Filsfils <cfilsfil@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, "George Swallow (swallow)" <swallow@cisco.com>, "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com>, "ke-kumaki@kddi.com" <ke-kumaki@kddi.com>, "Ruediger.Kunze@telekom.de" <Ruediger.Kunze@telekom.de>
References: <CA+YzgTswg0QAt09ADq+m_vEqcW6T0dKTcSot1uDdr82fC2SQ_Q@mail.gmail.com> <D2493E59.14EFB5%zali@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D2493E59.14EFB5%zali@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/c9JUlk8DypuDcYxz98l5CT680WQ>
Cc: "teas-chairs@ietf.org" <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regardig IPR on draft-ietf-teas-te-metric-recording
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:37:16 -0000

Hello,

I am aware of the same IPR as mentioned by Zafar.

Cheers,
Clarence

On 18-Oct-15 18:20, Zafar Ali (zali) wrote:
> Dear chairs and the WG:
>
> Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft.
>
> Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules, as
> follows:
>
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2019/
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Regards … Zafar
>
> From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com
> <mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com>>
> Date: Saturday, October 17, 2015 at 9:22 AM
> To: zali <zali@cisco.com <mailto:zali@cisco.com>>, "George Swallow
> (swallow)" <swallow@cisco.com <mailto:swallow@cisco.com>>, "Clarence
> Filsfils (cfilsfil)" <cfilsfil@cisco.com <mailto:cfilsfil@cisco.com>>,
> "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com
> <mailto:mhartley@cisco.com>>, "ke-kumaki@kddi.com
> <mailto:ke-kumaki@kddi.com>" <ke-kumaki@kddi.com
> <mailto:ke-kumaki@kddi.com>>, "Ruediger.Kunze@telekom.de
> <mailto:Ruediger.Kunze@telekom.de>" <Ruediger.Kunze@telekom.de
> <mailto:Ruediger.Kunze@telekom.de>>
> Cc: "teas@ietf.org <mailto:teas@ietf.org>" <teas@ietf.org
> <mailto:teas@ietf.org>>, "teas-chairs@ietf.org
> <mailto:teas-chairs@ietf.org>" <teas-chairs@ietf.org
> <mailto:teas-chairs@ietf.org>>
> Subject: Regardig IPR on draft-ietf-teas-te-metric-recording
>
> Authors, Contributors, (and TEAS WG),
>
> As part of the preparation for WG Last Call:
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
>
>    Please state either:
>
>    "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>    or
>    "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>
>     If yes to the above, please state either:
>
>    "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>    or
>    "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
>    If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
>    appropriate.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS
> MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
>
> If you are on the TEAS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules
> which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of
> others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any
> contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR.  For more
> information, please see the RFCs listed above and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
> Thank you,
> - TEAS WG Chairs
>
> PS: Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
> .