IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-lee-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics

Ricard Vilalta <ricard.vilalta@cttc.es> Mon, 10 June 2019 17:57 UTC

Return-Path: <ricard.vilalta@cttc.es>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE201200CE; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 10:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9A6K8csd9aR0; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 10:57:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx02.puc.rediris.es (outbound1sev.lav.puc.rediris.es [130.206.19.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBDAD1200B7; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 10:57:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leo.cttc.es (leo.cttc.es [84.88.62.208]) by mx02.puc.rediris.es with ESMTP id x5AHvQOH029423-x5AHvQOJ029423 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=CAFAIL); Mon, 10 Jun 2019 19:57:26 +0200
Received: from [192.168.1.106] (unknown [92.56.207.103]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by leo.cttc.es (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB1721FE27; Mon, 10 Jun 2019 19:57:25 +0200 (CEST)
To: satish karunanithi <satish.karunanithi@gmail.com>, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Cc: Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>, d.king@lancaster.ac.uk, Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <CA+YzgTuqenA6gDsZmqD3yR-sibii-cU-goB601Z8H5MT_Nq4Wg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPEcS0ucD+Nq79mpyt6pjW9Jo3fjuZkUR7d5pNsgTFzJDg9-bA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ricard Vilalta <ricard.vilalta@cttc.es>
Message-ID: <42d65acf-479b-2dd5-9a63-2f3f13978743@cttc.es>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 19:57:28 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAPEcS0ucD+Nq79mpyt6pjW9Jo3fjuZkUR7d5pNsgTFzJDg9-bA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------7049442C8C5DEE14E7B6EFA4"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/cq_fCL-MONdgLitywpJgS20Z0-g>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-lee-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2019 17:57:51 -0000

Hi Pavan,

No, I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Ricard

On 10/6/2019 17:24, satish karunanithi wrote:
> Hi Pavana,
> No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
> Regards,
> Satish.
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2019, 22:23 Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com 
> <mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
>     As part of the preparation for polling for WG document adoption:
>
>     Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
>
>       Please state either:
>
>       "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>       or
>       "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
>     If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
>     (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>
>     If yes to the above, please state either:
>
>       "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>       or
>       "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
>     If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
>       appropriate.
>
>     If you are listed as a document author or contributor please
>     answer the
>     above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
>     aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
>     stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
>     contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS
>     MESSAGE'S
>     TO LINES.
>
>     If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not
>     listed
>     as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
>     the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
>     aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
>     participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
>     undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed
>     above
>     and
>     http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
>     Thank you,
>     Pavan and Lou
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email