Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com> Mon, 11 May 2015 02:01 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3EFB1A0052 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 May 2015 19:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jAH5rYzgGTlB for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 May 2015 19:01:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EA491A0049 for <teas@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 May 2015 19:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BSI81428; Mon, 11 May 2015 02:01:03 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from BLREML407-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.20.4.45) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Mon, 11 May 2015 03:01:01 +0100
Received: from BLREML509-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.185]) by BLREML407-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.20.4.45]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Mon, 11 May 2015 07:30:49 +0530
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.dhody@huawei.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects
Thread-Index: AQHQisa2YnnxQmcowEuGwTwwSN/6zZ10yzOAgAE7AyA=
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 02:00:49 +0000
Message-ID: <23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B870B0C13@BLREML509-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <CA+YzgTt=C9rzmnr9jJVAwHJp7V+TMyFe7v3fesCKgxUzEYqakw@mail.gmail.com> <CAB75xn5FGR1KdqeXDkMEVq2DL+eqGdThdrWzw2-R+F1angwEsw@mail.gmail.com> <14d3dd72720.276d.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <14d3dd72720.276d.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-GB, zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.18.146.248]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_23CE718903A838468A8B325B80962F9B870B0C13BLREML509MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/d3c0iTIE7WsSbkqLpOHKqRAXP1o>
Cc: "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>, Udayasree palle <udayasree.palle@huawei.com>, Venugopal Reddy K <venugopalreddyk@huawei.com>, Ramon Casellas <ramon.casellas@cttc.es>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 02:01:08 -0000

Hi Lou,

You are right, thanks for providing the information.

Regards,
Dhruv

From: Teas [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger
Sent: 10 May 2015 18:10
To: Dhruv Dhody; Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Cc: Venugopal Reddy K; Udayasree palle; teas@ietf.org; Ramon Casellas
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects


Dhruv,

I note that you are pointing to a different disclosure than was pointed to during the (ccamp) WG acceptance process*.  While it certainly appropriate to point to the disclosure you list, it doesn't tell the whole story and may lead some to conclude there was a late disclosure on the document.  Which, of course wasn't, the case.

So I think it appropriate to also point to the information provided during WG acceptance, I.e.:
* thread replays to  http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/current/msg15117.html

Lou

On May 9, 2015 10:12:24 PM Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote:
Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2186/

Regards,
Dhruv


On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 12:49 AM, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com<mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com>> wrote:
Authors, Contributors, (and TEAS WG),

As part of the preparation for WG Last Call:

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?

  Please state either:

  "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
  or
  "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

   If yes to the above, please state either:

  "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
  or
  "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

  If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
  appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS
MESSAGE'S TO LINES.

If you are on the TEAS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules
which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of
others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any
contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR.  For more
information, please see the RFCs listed above and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,
 TEAS WG Chairs

PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
response.

_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
Teas@ietf.org<mailto:Teas@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas