Return-Path: X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687AEC18DB87; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 01:22:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -7.004 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.004 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=olddog.co.uk Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D2GjTWH-5NYB; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 01:21:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mta6.iomartmail.com (mta6.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EDA4C151993; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 01:21:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta6.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 48O8LpcW025338; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 09:21:51 +0100 Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5DD046050; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 09:21:51 +0100 (BST) Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98CAB4604B; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 09:21:51 +0100 (BST) Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.224]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 09:21:51 +0100 (BST) Received: from ioxnode3.iomartmail.com (ioxnode3.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.70]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 48O8LpY1025750 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Sep 2024 09:21:51 +0100 Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 09:21:51 +0100 (BST) From: Adrian Farrel To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, Vishnu Pavan Beeram , TEAS WG Message-ID: <762136658.2244950.1727166111240@www.getmymail.co.uk> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.6-Rev65 X-Originating-IP: 77.241.232.18 X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=olddog.co.uk; h=date :from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= 20221128; bh=sFObZ3grgCd5bDqCBbkxfBvFfZ1qEtEKAUkbYnD3RD0=; b=Xp3 dxLaAAyn7E+JCRAVoXUbrTeFZCWUaoM5Ub9s1NYnPGAVqXvaUws5DClOAjXBpVHE sDK7hzAbMiSK010ofwZojO+FcwQMxHSVbll4kkvop4+fomg5eezevLnbzJzdonGI jJP1bG7OKawhylKoRFhbjtJET+wMtz6VwFTwiUel7uUp1hX4TuQN/6pUxOyzaEoi Jc2a+TL9m3iSqUWEfFQuI8EKUdhlkueP62YcVFzEZsi6tA9AarFx1RgMDDQFNY7y hI0ULyoEdf9z774Eh7qYAVUbFxRBSiXLSNLYhHB5R4F4buiVPqRs3zmLEUFB38JC xRAZ6RUe+tNxVDsHrKg== X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-28352.003 X-TM-AS-Result: No--54.128-10.0-31-10 X-imss-scan-details: No--54.128-10.0-31-10 X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-28352.003 X-TMASE-Result: 10--54.127700-10.000000 X-TMASE-MatchedRID: IeZYkn8zfFraYagUwgwslJcbfQuv/LnJfMhjt3b5PP1XG3yI9k2vbPEP Quw/sQdyl+vfbzWpRd3zu+2be67kg576e9GOpfQKL4+sB3yBscklJy85NfiMc7wHu+XsbkzR90i bxL4bz6CIkdTq/H4yOwUl6ZzR9FYuhklgP+8bdPAytHfNua37RWTCRxOlIfWiYnqZiGAFgX1rjv IgtgqKC7LNnjSwqsGxwluIBdWhNduvxJaYc6X9S+5CGMbmjumUC//1TMV5chNeCCTODYxyV5dVT fpERP4jUbLEAKohnsdRgM2MVcov006sU21iJQvkgNylVbI/EAyiGsyrScSFB9zONa1Rspx3VS6x 6C9XSUhPBivmvNM6szhrqk4ZKV6jcL7188/R61aIf3m0sUfx5+bD6nEJCPKbL+H1U69PoCCmJ5j CyUYfiTtFn1Jf6uplBfDtz6DKa8KcZfACIDVXJFPePq7K9Rg8Nr21mij50Nu8MakitBkj0TI22d NVmg71lPrJVpcUWowYqhrdRKC7BZEF9RGWzKY1zH6d90mb4+IxXH/dlhvLvxV17CFfZYABfDofT psyCK/1ikAtBc0Idnotqe6GyX/I/XZOypEyd8dQsahOMIZ15SH8kDR0dp2mEDnWZT9yUvNd3Vn5 zwON+Q1Q9f0Zogoex/B0L5UwtxXO3jrCbr5cUzD53uZ505doRDaVGHNcyKhG98JTY2895iSSwZH 5mn3b8WWb8aaN/8fmDJF+XUFgCIp2dFgGFN75KPa/jYttsE8faOfEnhFMHNYRyNPDh9LApDBgBl Jlu2G0Y1qmoDQGUyAiuZ2OUSGisEVYjMUyogeeAiCmPx4NwFkMvWAuahr8zyZnf7JMtsh4N1jhR VQFLfAxRSAc0OENIuJieNVvzvp+3BndfXUhXQ== X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0 Message-ID-Hash: 3UA246VVQY5B2WVMFZBW5VEXKNYS26UJ X-Message-ID-Hash: 3UA246VVQY5B2WVMFZBW5VEXKNYS26UJ X-MailFrom: adrian@olddog.co.uk X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-teas.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: TEAS WG Chairs X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4 Precedence: list Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BTeas=5D_Re=3A_Responses_for_LS_on_=22Realization_of_Network_Sli?= =?utf-8?q?ces_for_5G_Networks_Using_Current_IP/MPLS_Technologies=22?= List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: =20 =20
Thanks to all for the hard work on this document. It is definitely getti= ng much better (and shorter) which is a good thing for all of us.
=20
 
=20
There does seem to have been a lot of changes sine the first last call, = and even since the second one. It also looks (to me) that there are a few o= f Jie's comments still unresolved.
=20
 
=20
I plan to scan the doc tonight and I'll try to suggest resolutions for t= he points that look to be still open.
=20
 
=20
A
=20
=20
On 24/09/2024 10:05 CEST mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote:
=20
 
=20
 
=20
=20

Hi Pavan, all,

=20

 

=20

FWIW, the changes are now implemented in the publi= c version together with additional follow-up comments from Jie: https:/= /datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-5g-ns-ip-mpls/11/. =20

 

=20

Cheers,

=20

Med

=20

 

=20
=20
=20
=20

De : BOUCADAIR Mohamed = INNOV/NET
Envoy=C3=A9 : lundi 9 septembre 2024 15= :34
=C3=80 : 'Vishnu Pavan Beeram' <vishnupavan= @gmail.com>; TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Cc := TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Objet : RE: [Teas] Responses for LS on "Realization of Network Slices for 5G Net= works Using Current IP/MPLS Technologies"

=20
=20
=20

 

=20

Hi Pavan, all,

=20

 

=20

Thanks for sharing your conclusions.

= =20

 

=20

Looks good to me. Fixed right now the ref nits: <= a href=3D"https://github.com/boucadair/5g-slice-realization/commit/3c11d6e6= baa2f50a10a95904c8abb29753e91034"> https://github.com/boucadair/5g-slice-re= alization/commit/3c11d6e6baa2f50a10a95904c8abb29753e91034. These nits c= an be queues for a next iteration when we will have more comments, but we c= an release a new version if you prefer so. Thanks.

=20

 

=20

Cheers,

=20

Med

=20

 

=20
=20
=20
=20

De : Vishnu Pavan Beer= am <vishnupavan@gmail.com&g= t;
Envoy=C3=A9 : lundi 9 septembre 2024 10:04
= =C3=80 : TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Cc : TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Objet : [Teas] Responses for LS on "Realization of Network = Slices for 5G Networks Using Current IP/MPLS Technologies"

=20
=20
=20

 

=20
=20

WG,

=20

 

=20

We sent a liaison statement [1] in June to multiple 3GP= P groups seeking feedback on our WG draft that discusses =E2=80=9CRealization = of Network Slices for 5G Networks Using Current IP/MPLS Technologies=E2=80= =9D [2]. =20

We have received replies from 3GPP-TSGSA-SA2 [3], 3GPP-TSG-SA-WG5 [4] and O3G= PPTSGRAN3 [5]. We request the WG to review the feedback and chime in with y= our thoughts/opinions.

=20

 

=20

The following is our (chairs=E2=80=99) interpretation o= f the feedback that was received.

=20

 

=20
    =20
  • 3GPP-TSGSA-SA2:
    • =20
=20
    =20
      =20
    • Remove Appendices B.1 and B.2 and just ha= ve a reference to TS-23.501
      • =20
    • No endorsement of the =E2=80=9CHand-off= =E2=80=9D options discussed in Section 4 and the QoS Mapping Realization Mo= dels in Section 5
      • =20
    =20
=20
    =20
      =20
        =20
      • This need not warrant any changes to Sec= tions 4 and 5. We need to ensure that the language used in these two sectio= ns doesn=E2=80=99t imply any endorsement by 3GPP.
        • =20
      =20
    =20
=20
    =20
  • 3GPP-TSG-SA-WG5:
    • =20
=20
    =20
      =20
    • Fix the reference to 3GPP TS 28.530
      • =20
    =20
=20
    =20
  • O3GPPTSGRAN3:
    • =20
=20
    =20
      =20
    • Inaccuracies exist in Appendix B.3. Sugge= st adding references to TS-38.300 and TS-38.401
      • =20
    =20
=20
    =20
      =20
        =20
      • In other words, this is a recommendation= to remove Appendix B.3.
        • =20
      =20
    =20
=20

 

=20

Based on the above, our recommendation is to remove App= endix B (including the Transport Network specific sub-section) and add the = suggested references in the Introduction. The authors have published a new = revision (rev 10) with Appendix B removed. Please review the latest changes= and let us know if there are any comments/concerns.

=20

 

=20

Regards,

=20

-Pavan and Oscar 

=20

 

=20

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1931/

=20

[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/= html/draft-ietf-teas-5g-ns-ip-mpls

=20

[3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1955/

=20

[4] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1956/

=20

[5] https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1957/

=20

 

=20
=20
=20
=20
=20 
_________________________________________________________=
___________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confiden=
tielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu=
 ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages el=
ectroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou =
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged inf=
ormation that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and dele=
te this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been =
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list -- teas@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to teas-leave@ietf.org