Return-Path: X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB38C180B41; Tue, 12 Nov 2024 07:50:45 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.103 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.103 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fH3McHF4i3cL; Tue, 12 Nov 2024 07:50:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-ed1-x533.google.com (mail-ed1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::533]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E8C2C20796B; Tue, 12 Nov 2024 07:50:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ed1-x533.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5cec93719ccso7613065a12.2; Tue, 12 Nov 2024 07:50:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1731426639; x=1732031439; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=jYnCHd+eIrOKqctDZ2PqTBKJMbMuvzwfUjO+gSpZ4Ow=; b=Pl/WMcBF5xIqplMotNjvLc/aMc3yYk3O5eY+5m1oMlRhKLeiALwRebQvaVZTYsoNJX uEytBR44OCBzbkDxnga4hxtJbvU9x3dlTcWQA7AkHTgnJVBpX0zx/xIAO/0VMXfZGnUG 2BhODR84/K5pGku1pTh3+/7wB8BA9HuGG3CD0AELGcWBIWQohhNns0GTJ8MEsRHcx60W SwKBozHy5EMZ9CYg2ZqmsrtvCCPSeguXX8BcvrBAvd2cm/kPXUBRFncdCI+73qzVrSDb tnGB1asEuwYZ4c/IdZrMQBa+Fbc8zzwtssuWmF6Kzcd/IZ7ycD81ioAfYdCjTe/aIZhD CVKw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1731426639; x=1732031439; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=jYnCHd+eIrOKqctDZ2PqTBKJMbMuvzwfUjO+gSpZ4Ow=; b=ReK6S2gOfNoDnOJYq0tXCbhmXquLTasouDXW7b9hRGx1o5t/s5xuq3FG99rbkkRGOl hyLnVT3ftzMvngQUEWyKhchSHGq4/yNeoLAtqobIfReMY0/9ZhnL7t0exIFnLAxGrany aKNHDlfrd8YwCANGjDw9+S4HxQqXAHbIPDRSyvOPJXiyF6zLjzgZQEH8BlOHaczQiNzm lH0qp8iJ5UL8c9oXi6X8/SpTamlz0vHPqa1dTrb1sh+8aCHGvnjqbeSse0lDJgQ6PBfa Toic+YB+S1IR+XGmOoQJSncKuQyjiV1VVN0Qj+8dnu/r7GN0/0ZF4qiekfS52N2djDgB LgMw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVFOOGAUxJPBWbryOU5MNeg4NVNlVpH5xF4HHS5U7Z/4blsuY6g/cwpuKg0A7RATW7EPJamqg==@ietf.org, AJvYcCXo/EwQgv2Ow661Ylv8cGbu+TqTyJQHXxc/IVJRi4NDcBMlxBxfVAtDCOrkbzqqZgd2lN4Srw==@ietf.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwZtGfQTNF2e04OpyR6oW5YgoesXDVboIjPu//S94QcbfYZuDhs wS2Prjee/e7D/iuxSxPbRI/e9ejNKql3pg3nn5pNhGQ8PlmevzyG6ltGJhI5Zpsvf9p3C1fD1zN Ix5V9zxk8wr+J5cYll9SeB1BY8Gs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGsH9R16eA6tnL9583qV8E3Vc4rRBUNAQ9bRYZx/W4cNLCz9yFotaz/MPDdDFM0A3YuLUnMKoqz3AHVrLzwy+k= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:518e:b0:5c9:3f2:6ea7 with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5cf4f3b25f4mr2823698a12.27.1731426639201; Tue, 12 Nov 2024 07:50:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <49a1953ca67e4e799531c4835d6241e8@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: From: Aihua Guo Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 10:50:26 -0500 Message-ID: To: "Sergio Belotti (Nokia)" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c8ca790626b92dcb" Message-ID-Hash: OZM3MZMZ4TXDSAWEJTYC4JFFRCZNCVJQ X-Message-ID-Hash: OZM3MZMZ4TXDSAWEJTYC4JFFRCZNCVJQ X-MailFrom: aihuaguo.ietf@gmail.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-teas.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: "Daniele Ceccarelli (dceccare)" , tom petch , Italo Busi , "teas@ietf.org" , "ccamp@ietf.org" X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6 Precedence: list Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BTeas=5D_Re=3A_=5BCCAMP=5DRe=3A_Missing_switching-types_for_WSON?= =?utf-8?q?_and_flexi-grid=3A_WG_LC_comment_for_RFC_8776-bis_or_RFC_9093-bis?= List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: --000000000000c8ca790626b92dcb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 for RFC9093bis. Also, for WSON-LSC and flexi-grid LSC, the base identity should be LSC. Aihua On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 10:02=E2=80=AFAM Sergio Belotti (Nokia) wrote: > +1 > > Thanks > Sergio > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Daniele Ceccarelli (dceccare) > > > Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2024 2:28 PM > > To: tom petch ; Italo Busi > > ; teas@ietf.org; ccamp@ietf.o= rg > > Subject: [CCAMP]Re: Missing switching-types for WSON and flexi-grid: WG > LC > > comment for RFC 8776-bis or RFC 9093-bis > > > > > > CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clickin= g > links or > > opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information. > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > Cheers > > Daniele > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: tom petch > > Sent: Saturday, November 9, 2024 1:06 PM > > To: Italo Busi ; teas@ietf.or= g; > > ccamp@ietf.org > > Subject: [CCAMP]Re: Missing switching-types for WSON and flexi-grid: WG > LC > > comment for RFC 8776-bis or RFC 9093-bis > > > > From: Italo Busi > > Sent: 09 November 2024 11:18 > > > > I have recently noted that there are no standardized YANG identities > that could be > > used to represent the WSON-LSC, defined in RFC 7688, and flexi-grid LSC= , > defined > > in RFC 8363 > > > > I am not sure whether these identities are better defined in TE Types > (RFC 8776- > > bis) or Layer0 Types (RFC 9093-bis) YANG models but since both drafts > are in WG > > LC we can fix in either was this gap > > > > My personal preference is to add them to RFC 9093-bis in order to avoid > the need > > to update TE Types any time a new technology-specific switching type or > LSP > > encoding type is defined > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > I agree > > > > Tom Petch > > > > > > > > Italo > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > CCAMP mailing list -- ccamp@ietf.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to ccamp-leave@ietf.org > > _______________________________________________ > > CCAMP mailing list -- ccamp@ietf.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to ccamp-leave@ietf.org > _______________________________________________ > CCAMP mailing list -- ccamp@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to ccamp-leave@ietf.org > --000000000000c8ca790626b92dcb Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
+1 for RFC9093bis. Also, for WSON-LSC and= flexi-grid LSC, the base identity should be LSC.

Aihua<= /div>

On Tue, Nov 12, 2024 at 10:02=E2=80=AFAM Sergio Belotti (Nokia) <se= rgio.belotti=3D40nokia.com@dm= arc.ietf.org> wrote:
+1

Thanks
Sergio

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniele Ceccarelli (dceccare) <dceccare=3D40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org= >
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2024 2:28 PM
> To: tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>; Italo Busi
> <Italo.Busi=3D40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; teas@ietf.org; ccamp@ietf.org
> Subject: [CCAMP]Re: Missing switching-types for WSON and flexi-grid: W= G LC
> comment for RFC 8776-bis or RFC 9093-bis
>
>
> CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicki= ng links or
> opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information. >
>
>
> +1
>
> Cheers
> Daniele
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tom petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>
> Sent: Saturday, November 9, 2024 1:06 PM
> To: Italo Busi <Italo.Busi=3D40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; teas@ietf.org;
> ccamp@ietf.org=
> Subject: [CCAMP]Re: Missing switching-types for WSON and flexi-grid: W= G LC
> comment for RFC 8776-bis or RFC 9093-bis
>
> From: Italo Busi <Italo.Busi=3D40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> Sent: 09 November 2024 11:18
>
> I have recently noted that there are no standardized YANG identities t= hat could be
> used to represent the WSON-LSC, defined in RFC 7688, and flexi-grid LS= C, defined
> in RFC 8363
>
> I am not sure whether these identities are better defined in TE Types = (RFC 8776-
> bis) or Layer0 Types (RFC 9093-bis) YANG models but since both drafts = are in WG
> LC we can fix in either was this gap
>
> My personal preference is to add them to RFC 9093-bis in order to avoi= d the need
> to update TE Types any time a new technology-specific switching type o= r LSP
> encoding type is defined
>
> What do you think?
>
> <tp>
> I agree
>
> Tom Petch
>
>
>
> Italo
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list -- ccamp@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to ccamp-leave@ietf.org
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list -- ccamp@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to ccamp-leave@ietf.org
_______________________________________________
CCAMP mailing list -- c= camp@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ccamp-leave@ietf.org
--000000000000c8ca790626b92dcb--