[Teas] Fwd: Regarding IPR on draft-dt-teas-rfc3272bis-11

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Tue, 16 June 2020 17:25 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+YzgTuZggA3eCMPfhErX=RvbuC3AjoPEeCB_TbuqJgYc8a4SQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+YzgTuL_CYhzz_grMoS44bLF-aYWHbHweY_+utt9YFbP4KVfg@mail.gmail.com> <CAEz6PPSQFi8KjMm0Q6=QA0h4bj=8tbEM=OWGxTujXrd71XXFjA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEz6PPSQFi8KjMm0Q6=QA0h4bj=8tbEM=OWGxTujXrd71XXFjA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 12:25:37 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTs-E07SOjWAOC2eF60AvZdA8dGLJr8Vk7pnFS1R7LsnVw@mail.gmail.com>
To: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009682fb05a836d57d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/e4Ja6OYUQXxMDRZrDgGUR2uHybw>
Subject: [Teas] Fwd: Regarding IPR on draft-dt-teas-rfc3272bis-11
Precedence: list

Fwding Xufeng's IPR response to the list..

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 8:51 PM
Subject: Re: Regarding IPR on draft-dt-teas-rfc3272bis-11
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Cc: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, Gert Grammel <ggrammel@juniper.net>,
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>


No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Thanks,
- Xufeng

On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 10:51 AM Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Fixed <Subject>
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:50 AM Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>>
>> As part of the preparation for polling for WG document adoption:
>>
>> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
>>
>>   Please state either:
>>
>>   "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>>   or
>>   "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>>
>> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
>> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>>
>> If yes to the above, please state either:
>>
>>   "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>>   or
>>   "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>>
>> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
>>   appropriate.
>>
>> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
>> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
>> aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not advance to the next
>> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
>> contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS
>> MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
>>
>> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
>> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
>> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
>> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
>> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
>> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
>> and
>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Pavan
>>
>

[Teas] Regarding IPR on Search Results Web result… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-dt-teas-rfc3272… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-dt-teas-rfc3272… Lou Berger
Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on Search Results Web re… Loa Andersson
[Teas] Fwd: RE: Regarding IPR on draft-dt-teas-rf… Lou Berger
[Teas] Fwd: Regarding IPR on draft-dt-teas-rfc327… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
[Teas] Fwd: Regarding IPR on draft-dt-teas-rfc327… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on Search Results Web re… Loa Andersson