[Teas] Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-07
daniel@olddog.co.uk Tue, 20 August 2024 12:11 UTC
Return-Path: <dk@danielking.net>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71782C14F6A8 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 05:11:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.656
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.656 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=danielking-net.20230601.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dpkjkonHBX9t for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 05:11:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12e.google.com (mail-lf1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DD6DC1D875A for <teas@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 05:11:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-530e062217eso7267812e87.1 for <teas@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 05:11:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=danielking-net.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1724155871; x=1724760671; darn=ietf.org; h=content-language:thread-index:mime-version:message-id:date:subject :in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from:sender:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=qnbEyZNSWb+kYKRr36N8l1rZp+t9d4zk9Lqh+UqjuiU=; b=mPgw+tU/WbJgKXlGekyfh5lv0FBpUJ0fxNTGHsIbvdvpdWEIAGXaKafE2UakwebZa6 sU72N/AAXInAzTLF+2xw4LfXbKstiiT/8/gdbtsaUulw9k2V+4Fz8hO9D7rTjBmTkLJb bGV2u6QlSbUNwiInizY6nfhaTgxTw56BhgOq8CWNxgiUX/ddYAIUPKmCMTNRvjAipXga 8iRCadJjsfZLRWLoCGJJRHLq3XvTa7ZZbKRhVUeA6rPMMv9Bny3LgPsTXu2BX0K9tnJH HLRjG3pDrijZGTP8sTBMzB1WJ9VjVRSjZb1l7gjV2dFspi7Pgu88LTVXRUbMws/P/Bq6 DZgQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1724155871; x=1724760671; h=content-language:thread-index:mime-version:message-id:date:subject :in-reply-to:references:cc:to:from:sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=qnbEyZNSWb+kYKRr36N8l1rZp+t9d4zk9Lqh+UqjuiU=; b=ioPSfhFEie/ddaTA0UWTNy8JMq4uT//M7/hbXq4mxIF7bMqWFWrp1acCZr1+yh0MG/ Vxn8uiT4FK48DPdLkuVEun6rNjOwH7JCsv7ybiodTx4hYMEGwLPNnhduCC0GplmFbT3x UCNKsOLmR5OgUQf+hPGKqNu2evj70DgTKMAx6DCyP0A9Uq1pVgcJNnRz3Xygp5t5l2B5 6zNI35QGpvfNxz7Y7IxcezC3OvAq52nIugiLP9PLKz5TqGnENLzZANxkHEgifo2HyGi7 xdiTB3E/mTmd4Z7ReCcc2oxALCeSqEFULm9wwijaZP+fLW55YeoQobYA2MJ0RwHnosah hdCw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUJalXmJAuyllmhExANe+sggMq90cskayXVXd4eH7rGgJggmT5RUkM8xOWRSD4Jq67GnxtS@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx+Yx2d6cNbzdsZa83ZHWPDl4W2LxKoWEq4bpmTuD+xmXxMAf+l AC0E50J03Vtn9F2+Mbgk+HFVROk8i1y3KCEL3Jg8FO8KDg8clp/xQaTSDV2Olg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGB0GAGYFyLKqDXSQUV2Xv2dVkb2iSAgkhlpVO8oEEfH9DQJ4SAfeQLBbnHjlJEhUEPIojRYQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:696:b0:52c:e0e1:9ae3 with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-5331c6e97d1mr8989405e87.57.1724155870363; Tue, 20 Aug 2024 05:11:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CIPHER ([2a00:23c7:115:2301:89fd:1598:35fa:c3a8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-a83839471d6sm750592366b.153.2024.08.20.05.11.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Aug 2024 05:11:09 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Daniel King <dk@danielking.net>
X-Google-Original-Sender: <dk@danielking.net>
From: daniel@olddog.co.uk
To: "'Joe Clarke (jclarke)'" <jclarke@cisco.com>, adrian@olddog.co.uk, ops-dir@ietf.org
References: <172355676902.854616.9874061624740834216@dt-datatracker-6df4c9dcf5-t2x2k> <008a01daedcf$739cccc0$5ad66640$@olddog.co.uk> <BN9PR11MB537179950AE640B03BD3591AB8872@BN9PR11MB5371.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN9PR11MB537179950AE640B03BD3591AB8872@BN9PR11MB5371.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 13:11:08 +0100
Message-ID: <1bcc01daf2fa$0aaa2700$1ffe7500$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_1BCD_01DAF302.6C6EDD20"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQFoyfmQeulpinfIW+oEbUiQOqutAQNQZzQfAgo83suy6YpzQA==
Content-Language: en-gb
Message-ID-Hash: AKQ4JB6SZRA4PVFBXLAIS2SOHR7G7P4L
X-Message-ID-Hash: AKQ4JB6SZRA4PVFBXLAIS2SOHR7G7P4L
X-MailFrom: dk@danielking.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-teas.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Teas] Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-07
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/e5FTYI0CL_0Aoq8Or-K3ORU2irs>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:teas-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:teas-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:teas-leave@ietf.org>
Hi Joe, Thank you for the review and comments. The latest version of the I-D uses the new text agreed below. BR, Dan (on behalf of the authors). From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke@cisco.com> Sent: 14 August 2024 13:54 To: adrian@olddog.co.uk; ops-dir@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing.all@ietf.org; last-call@ietf.org; teas@ietf.org Subject: [Teas] Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-07 I think, however, we should find a way to mention the L2NM and L3NM models for completeness. Probably, in Section 4: OLD Note 2 - The Service Orchestrator-to-MDSC Interface (XMI) is an interface between two MDSC functional elements encompassing different MDSC service-related functions which is not defined in [RFC8453]. NEW Note 2 - The Service Orchestrator-to-MDSC Interface (XMI) is an interface between two MDSC functional elements encompassing different MDSC service-related functions which is not defined in [RFC8453]. Depending on the function being delivered, the XMI might be realised by the Layer 2 VPN Network Management YANG model [RFC9291] or the Layer 3 VPN Network Management YANG model [RFC9182]. END Would that help? [JMC] Yeah, it helps. And maybe change the southbound text in the figure to be physical device/network interface? It was that figure that really started me scratching my head as to why you'd go straight to the devices necessarily (you might, but you might also use another network-layer abstraction given some of the examples). Joe Cheers, Adrian
- [Teas] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-teas… Joe Clarke via Datatracker
- [Teas] Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-… Adrian Farrel
- [Teas] Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-… Joe Clarke (jclarke)
- [Teas] Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-… daniel