[Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ceccarelli-teas-actn-framework

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Sat, 04 June 2016 00:57 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE48812D19F for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 17:57:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ptXVad2VlPfV for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 17:57:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x234.google.com (mail-vk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2D5812B05D for <teas@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 17:57:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id c189so136360865vkb.1 for <teas@ietf.org>; Fri, 03 Jun 2016 17:57:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=keREJkGlrB+MDS1F1mI8h/wtK+Q64CLH8K34Kn0UKxw=; b=pRoBDritgPfvCK8h9zNuIvCZGQY69LlcN5RreQzkJOr+tD6IO+JdSyQjpLgAlHBQkQ v361wbhseedolojj87kvpZnYYD1lbKEeUgzFgAJmXuTjyVIxoDuebcGfkJLTHbOCEppe +6V3kWnkCySB3P442Vxv9plbTlSpbmbhr/xf3sJdETPDrbvfoubItu6J3BfWrjb1iZN9 ehn7Yet8UDOYufmbl7inXEDFUd2cemdEm64jteoB+AZx+YbEi14xRlD7DUOt67McWFBv SjwRZuv0lh4ozz1MB5oJ84ClRU9zuF6kZnr1CvdnzQcAqpUEbaJ9idj9vgiP0nVCvAiN zADw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=keREJkGlrB+MDS1F1mI8h/wtK+Q64CLH8K34Kn0UKxw=; b=Ga8pf7UQIABVFP5TDJbG4fBwaTRgpUitjI+4D5LiuZStzJdKQnf15XCfNkKsWiAcxX 9MEP0yM6UFlKRdJAkYiQZ524M2cOlSCkO+pIQC88aJxXCSNH+Pptzbz8HxEGekBrrqy5 +JR3dkCNXGqnt97w8pfbmWIUAsNDtruGxDcAlNcsgdYeaOrE+4gTTjAb/KIcoZCEFPmb hwWpiLcr1T5sLAn/lXtcvCCv/uProU69RWAt41D5OToz8kk00093gw2W4LTF7HZH/bY6 PmVsqpngXYFh7eUMbOCa/7OhR5ypencinIlLWK/cZDmGOhzQ6UoGeBC19YtqPYxkCogP gk0g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIBUktzby6A8ffZoBzWXkbFWblC1FOXGRhhcNB0qLBCRTi2WrFJ3eooLp7KOHEueN/qBmSJItbwcrkT0A==
X-Received: by with SMTP id i4mr3206419uad.88.1465001855703; Fri, 03 Jun 2016 17:57:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by with HTTP; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 17:57:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 20:57:35 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTu3=1cSnwjMMojBvoR_SVzwacPdpmwe5jHq1A-0brbuCg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>, luyuanf@gmail.com, diego@tid.es, "BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)" <sergio.belotti@alcatel-lucent.com>, d.king@lancaster.ac.uk, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>, Gert Grammel <ggrammel@juniper.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c1237263461da0534695323"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/e9lsbcSMVOjuE5fGYp2zIN1rfj4>
Cc: "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Subject: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ceccarelli-teas-actn-framework
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2016 00:57:39 -0000

Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of the preparation for polling for WG document adoption:

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?

  Please state either:

  "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
  "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

  "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
  "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above

Thank you,
TEAS WG Chairs

PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your