Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-contreras-teas-slice-nbi-06

mohamed.boucadair@orange.com Tue, 05 July 2022 09:29 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5A8FC15CF35; Tue, 5 Jul 2022 02:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MyNZqhrMJh8K; Tue, 5 Jul 2022 02:29:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.70.35]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF6F3C15CF32; Tue, 5 Jul 2022 02:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfednr06.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.70]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by opfednr21.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTPS id 4Lccnm60JKz5wGT; Tue, 5 Jul 2022 11:29:32 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1657013372; bh=v7+lVoEHtRpB4hsxDDFyElO7SBx8qZEHv5z3ANrX+jA=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=C/eEm4yJn93nCCJbn05S/L8EtZemsv/nkfUNhh3XqO0PIVCTBuzmBu4XZxFgiv3lm ED+PUUCO7sC7vb5IOgH0KefGUUDmOLsB6NKvE8FZfVt2t9eIXkHwauQE/Dxjnjd0Pb DT30s7BPlHAYlodvPLvn7qITrVSDzTZAnQZjVbMe12QJKbvRH09+ziwzUSjIDDwcAe /HrSNw+VUHRAT3s2Fe6mlspvhHOkCCeyR+LmWRX4AHNfN6GGX6IgpVOkA1+NrIWvIj /kWsVCC8RmU7b4IFExEDfR1jOEoQKiq5gGiFL6MEvE3Ny4L34kdi42euoGfImV8HWk Y5PWpMaYiIcuQ==
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, 'Vishnu Pavan Beeram' <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, 'TEAS WG' <teas@ietf.org>
CC: 'TEAS WG Chairs' <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-contreras-teas-slice-nbi-06
Thread-Index: AQIPgl1IfzhnbIOfA7nB0cCPfKDP/Kz90wMAgAPJIFA=
Content-Class:
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2022 09:29:32 +0000
Message-ID: <14414_1657013372_62C4047C_14414_18_30_f2df4840030942c19ddec193900e1387@orange.com>
References: <CA+YzgTs4Z5eEKQfWs19chLxq1bHN0oiRDPfkqWJROsUrNXFnWw@mail.gmail.com> <02ae01d88e6c$003d0200$00b70600$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <02ae01d88e6c$003d0200$00b70600$@olddog.co.uk>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_Enabled=true; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_SetDate=2022-07-05T09:20:33Z; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_Method=Privileged; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_Name=unrestricted_parent.2; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_SiteId=90c7a20a-f34b-40bf-bc48-b9253b6f5d20; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_ActionId=a7c30de2-785a-4e2d-b438-6cc2381328c2; MSIP_Label_07222825-62ea-40f3-96b5-5375c07996e2_ContentBits=0
x-originating-ip: [10.115.26.52]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_f2df4840030942c19ddec193900e1387orangecom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/eSjSj5qU-HMJz3AljVJFHzdnRYA>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-contreras-teas-slice-nbi-06
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2022 09:29:41 -0000

Hi Adrian, all,

(focusing on this specific comment below)

As you known, adopting does not mean that the document will make it to the RFC stage. IMO, this document is a good ** support document **. As such, it falls under https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/support-documents/ and the WG may decide to let it expire when it serves its purposes or not.

The merit I see in formally adopting is to have a WG reference to assess the slice service model against a set of cases and capture consensus about any missing attributes that need to be reflected in the service model itself.

Cheers,
Med

De : Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> De la part de Adrian Farrel
Envoyé : dimanche 3 juillet 2022 01:33
À : 'Vishnu Pavan Beeram' <vishnupavan@gmail.com>; 'TEAS WG' <teas@ietf.org>
Cc : 'TEAS WG Chairs' <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Objet : Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll: draft-contreras-teas-slice-nbi-06

Hi,

(Not late with this review!)

I only have one question about supporting the adoption of this document
and that is to wonder whether the work is overtaken by events. We
already have work progressing developing and specifying the IETF Network
Slice Service Interface YANG model in draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-
slice-nbi-yang. That YANG model is surely based on discussions that
arise from this work, and I am not doubting the value of those
discussions. But I don't quite understand why we need to pursue this I-D
towards an RFC when it's principal purpose is surely to shape the
content of the YANG model. Have I missed the purpose of this draft?



_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.