IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01

Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Fri, 04 December 2020 16:00 UTC

Return-Path: <tony1athome@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 003533A0ED5; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 08:00:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5CSJf3mxL4OP; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 08:00:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x635.google.com (mail-pl1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::635]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67EFE3A0DEB; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 08:00:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x635.google.com with SMTP id x4so3329213pln.8; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 08:00:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=IEeyrxC41xr6MD3k4kkjtVqKzHbmLu/FikuJfFROsFU=; b=Sx/4qKAFvMAHjqjKGfXT0l989iBYWAyrPcEcmusDtv+FRP2C/C3AGLoOhSuKT3fLi4 CyRSgxMMKILIjF5FPmdZ9XCboRDfC6etHVpCHVSqysHzPb5U3keXbD9kPRa5BIJmXkH6 ION6WzRc9aEho9ofrUsOXUG5Hu/qEvsMUd50ORbsIa7PJ6iZQtjHQ6vM2PwX0ti72Cfd kvhJkzpbw9tNFGCGj3ntCTl44LkRaksv1jn/oPjXzO1YfJJO0vCj3LM0Pt0s6Rmzty1v mbZbfw77uGHekLqbfI55y9hwBC0Ow38JNKx4d11gQsuKST+u6oBERtAxL7mRVYPOurxz isXw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=IEeyrxC41xr6MD3k4kkjtVqKzHbmLu/FikuJfFROsFU=; b=iDpFMd5bpGHv9oC7cVS2c3O4w7BJmFPoF5cE8KnDeHzbdYsLB4Rz1KkTzKHWcZXfjm 9NUapLi4etboq/nXOo/1gV15wGgu3H5DRLTzAdAfWLImt00c61pCRearso4ggfJihTlc WgayEwsmFZry3dVxfjivflb3tst2i9HOfDYRAUvj/r2qQZuP6ipOcy7t3tIyrabBeDKL MvLVNUo0B0ApCA6z7SgvwYsXG9A5o658PA+rfXZ7FkEV8msTSagBqJfr1ShQpScKBX46 dQf9njI+hPl7/3KYawD3/JIskjNr83YwwW+rabzk9uju9OEslNq+MlS97CZgvzXktgpl 0gdw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532fFJEb1terNoNEfoN5/45E9oVzTtiN0uEA2KbGg/ipMbauFZku d5/1nKh1D+POd2j7MfQVcfedghJZZqzNDA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyoTD2HUsK8l2YN9e8HGT1RLOHp9N+d9uhq8VsevFTLLFlZHhDe+93l0YZWOPMvm9St6eLCgw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8c82:b029:da:c46c:aa44 with SMTP id t2-20020a1709028c82b02900dac46caa44mr4550323plo.26.1607097631742; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 08:00:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.4.24] (c-67-169-103-239.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [67.169.103.239]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e3sm5451350pfe.154.2020.12.04.08.00.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Dec 2020 08:00:31 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Tony Li <tony1athome@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <CAB75xn48waYZJ8nGP8ErUTc-pmV2p_=iB4gjbzDLcfNgufP4Zw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 08:00:29 -0800
Cc: "TEAS WG (teas@ietf.org)" <teas@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <96A4AAEF-AD85-4547-A85B-B13A5724204D@tony.li>
References: <777B2AC4-CACF-4AB0-BFC7-B0CFFA881EEB@cisco.com> <CAOj+MMEmmFfN228okgFGM09qaiB8s0nS_8rQEqwBVsdJidy8XA@mail.gmail.com> <F1AE46BD-5809-467A-9CE1-69C08406CB40@gmail.com> <CAOj+MMED+kWaT8Hr-ohq8U1ADYrcNCQDX-svADzVjbo81urJ8A@mail.gmail.com> <5ec998de-115b-4a0a-818d-5df893082d49@Spark> <CAB75xn48waYZJ8nGP8ErUTc-pmV2p_=iB4gjbzDLcfNgufP4Zw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/fDzKMeYVR6ps5HyealLocFxp_hw>
Subject: Re: [Teas] [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IGP Flexible Algorithms (Flex-Algorithm) In IP Networks" - draft-bonica-lsr-ip-flexalgo-01
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 16:00:49 -0000


> On Dec 3, 2020, at 10:27 PM, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Two questions for us -
> 1. Should we include Flex Algo in RFC3272bis?
> 2. Should we expand on "partial TE" to accommodate these cases a little better?


1. Yes, absolutely. You would be doing everyone a grave disservice to the industry to exclude options from what is attempting to be a comprehensive survey.

2. Is this constructive? No solution is going to provide everything to everyone. Not every network requires every possible feature. We should strive for clarity and let others judge their own needs.

Tony

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email