Re: [Teas] Network Slicing Design Team definitions

"Joel M. Halpern" <> Thu, 30 April 2020 14:58 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E871E3A0AB3 for <>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 07:58:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZbzxOnM9RRhP for <>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 07:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8F413A0AB5 for <>; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 07:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49CdnB5R6bz1p0by; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 07:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=2.tigertech; t=1588258734; bh=CBX0NRsnzrJdlL2kBgV9VQ7V1vALqpprhU9ZmjooIEM=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=FI0yOOK7U5Zh2WnE94MAlqfw5vAgO07JmIEq/lgRPs1KGeS8iSy7HgBgPBUnUSuuA nKdWIAn/7Qb/wcwFgetGBtXftMq/AF2NebK2L/aMAVSJxLE1U8uriZSWOORpawhFXE ernGF/CqPUY2u4HMuXkfTFBZB5yyimqMIiigzzRQ=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at
Received: from [] ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49Cdn96dJzz1p12F; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 07:58:53 -0700 (PDT)
To: Jari Arkko <>
Cc: "" <>
References: <> <>
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <>
Message-ID: <>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 10:58:51 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Network Slicing Design Team definitions
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 14:58:56 -0000

I am referring to the later text on endpoints.  It defines transport 
endpoints and service endpoints.  But not actual endpoints.  So I found 
it odd.


On 4/30/2020 10:29 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:
> Joel:
>> Oddity:
>>     The definition of Endpoint has the oddity that it seems to leave the original packet source and the intended packet destination as not being Endpoints?  They can not be attached directly to the transport slice?
> I’d like to understand your comment better. What specific text are you referring to? The definition simply said:
> "A transport slice is a logical network topology connecting a number
>     of endpoints and a set of shared or dedicated network resources,
>     which are used to satisfy specific Service Level Objectives (SLO)”.
> At least in my mind this isn’t necessarily related to packet source and destination addresses; I may want a VPN between your network and mine, but that’s different from the addresses used in the traffic entering the VPN. For instance, my computer’s address is not the endpoint of the VPN, my VPN router is.
> But maybe I misunderstood the comment. I agree that the sections that come after the definition and talk about e.g. specific characteristics may have confused something in some cases. E.g., not sure we’ve entirely covered directionality correctly in all the text.
> Jari