IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] [E] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-ingress-protection

fengman.xu@verizon.com Mon, 13 March 2017 14:41 UTC

Return-Path: <fengman.xu@verizon.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 730FD12943F; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 07:41:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=verizon.com header.b=izH0dqVd; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=verizon.com header.b=ZkVRmZEu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sgTEnGa1tVA6; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 07:41:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omzsmtpe02.verizonbusiness.com (omzsmtpe02.verizonbusiness.com [199.249.25.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3665F129470; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 07:41:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=verizon.com; i=@verizon.com; q=dns/txt; s=corp; t=1489416077; x=1520952077; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=lXQFPUGFM6P/cC+uqRgndEJUaTW3dIVxrKLYep/AzeA=; b=izH0dqVdIRyEvS1IcVbgMroFsPk8e2kn/kn+q14WHN5f3ks3rxvIkyEb 5B51OkXkyKwbRX9EFmuoem2VqTiTCvGpIczesTPi5jaKBgjWCe3SgPR6h VVbmXxqCWYD+xBgooAlq/Y5WGi8maT76S9uiyF8bjjv2prc596E6olZSU o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: false
Received: from unknown (HELO fldsmtpi02.verizon.com) ([166.68.71.144]) by omzsmtpe02.verizonbusiness.com with ESMTP; 13 Mar 2017 14:40:56 +0000
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.36,159,1486425600"; d="scan'208,217";a="1398494374"
Received: from rogue-10-255-192-101.rogue.vzwcorp.com (HELO atlantis.verizonwireless.com) ([10.255.192.101]) by fldsmtpi02.verizon.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 13 Mar 2017 14:40:14 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=verizon.com; i=@verizon.com; q=dns/txt; s=corp; t=1489416014; x=1520952014; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=lXQFPUGFM6P/cC+uqRgndEJUaTW3dIVxrKLYep/AzeA=; b=ZkVRmZEu7SY0GQmjv7qTsxkam5P6RitpvFA2J39MCqMF3SbqTOLG7w4m oXzlHgPrMGCDPy7eKCVGVewdl2w4PtDM78YfqfhCZBKPqPgpbb2Mj98R4 rSuOWaelzop7Pba+7ejKl7+t7ia+vw/st4IyE9fGtU7iPGm+efVJU0t+9 w=;
Received: from mariner.tdc.vzwcorp.com (HELO eris.verizonwireless.com) ([10.254.88.84]) by atlantis.verizonwireless.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 13 Mar 2017 10:40:13 -0400
From: fengman.xu@verizon.com
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@huawei.com>, Raveendra Torvi <rtorvi@juniper.net>, "ningso01@gmail.com" <ningso01@gmail.com>, "hliu@ciena.com" <hliu@ciena.com>, "zhenbin.li@huawei.com" <zhenbin.li@huawei.com>, "yshen@juniper.net" <yshen@juniper.net>, "Tarek Saad (tsaad)" <tsaad@cisco.com>, mehmet.toy@verizon.com, "liulei.kddi@gmail.com" <liulei.kddi@gmail.com>, "renwei.li@huawei.com" <renwei.li@huawei.com>, "quintin.zhao@huawei.com" <quintin.zhao@huawei.com>, "Boris.Zhang@telus.com" <Boris.Zhang@telus.com>, "mjork@juniper.net" <mjork@juniper.net>
X-Host: mariner.tdc.vzwcorp.com
Received: from casac1exh002.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com ([10.11.218.44]) by eris.verizonwireless.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 13 Mar 2017 14:40:08 +0000
Received: from scwexch22apd.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com (153.114.130.41) by CASAC1EXH002.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com (10.11.218.44) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 07:40:01 -0700
Received: from scwexch28apd.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com (153.114.130.47) by scwexch22apd.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com (153.114.130.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 07:40:00 -0700
Received: from scwexch28apd.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com ([153.114.130.47]) by scwexch28apd.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com ([153.114.130.47]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 13 Mar 2017 07:40:00 -0700
Thread-Topic: [E] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-ingress-protection
Thread-Index: AQHSlsFmpRo9etkZtEqiSp/hqj5R06GS4bWQ
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 14:40:00 +0000
Message-ID: <ad7381cd53a54bc3b91b6fc910e04c29@scwexch28apd.uswin.ad.vzwcorp.com>
References: <CA+YzgTthjgtzu3WKc7=2jeVYg=4bXTuctoS6jpLY6PYUqGV-XQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTthjgtzu3WKc7=2jeVYg=4bXTuctoS6jpLY6PYUqGV-XQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.144.60.250]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_ad7381cd53a54bc3b91b6fc910e04c29scwexch28apduswinadvzwc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/gwyLWU5WhJNZU6ox3hHpMG3UfO0>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Teas] [E] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-ingress-protection
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 14:41:19 -0000

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram [mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2017 3:34 PM
To: Huaimo Chen; Raveendra Torvi; ningso01@gmail.com; hliu@ciena.com; zhenbin.li@huawei.com; yshen@juniper.net; Tarek Saad (tsaad); Xu, Fengman; Toy, Mehmet; liulei.kddi@gmail.com; renwei.li@huawei.com; quintin.zhao@huawei.com; Boris.Zhang@telus.com; mjork@juniper.net
Cc: teas@ietf.org; TEAS WG Chairs
Subject: [E] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-ingress-protection

Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of the preparation for WG Last Call

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
TO LINES.

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,
Pavan and Lou

PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
response.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email