Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-lsp-fastreroute

Manav Bhatia <manav@ionosnetworks.com> Sat, 17 October 2015 22:02 UTC

Return-Path: <manav@ionosnetworks.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D62DD1B2C82 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 15:02:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ED-GxPvT8BEF for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 15:02:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-f42.google.com (mail-pa0-f42.google.com [209.85.220.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07AFE1B2C71 for <teas@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 15:02:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pabws5 with SMTP id ws5so743475pab.2 for <teas@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 15:02:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:mime-version :content-type; bh=anhlLshV7gjvM+o5l1QB0fzGlvCP6FEihWKCrzC1egY=; b=TOlFUFUcCFuWzo0uKL4XhwFMDwD2peevQ3Hgq/dcPvi3wLzuiStM0q6jdWCHuxtLtK Q28Ndxdj3cDjQsJRCjSDFWyOu1NOsc8AzS/8zbwFjCbUGhi6Q8lOdI844Rgn69EmJAqs T9OF9NLj7tdLunFoDZcpoDXG45pdlDak4yM76x4QU/Ka0qOoNv1kmAL0urM8Y2a9edpu u1wCf2AwINnX9ASft0Jaw2xR+OXteq6lSj30FnH+ivLypv53/dnZR/aqL1syZ10nbO0j FuwIIOFWfxg7vRVHrCoFPtlwWgmX0Q6oaoJvAwMLIAdw3XqYGpVnXP3VDNqmhjKCu/LR lklg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnJ/jkPl6AFeNonH7X1FvkqnnlezR/Z1sPS6Pbf0518UQ6PPtfcDWFH6nztkvkbt9Zf8hKy
X-Received: by 10.66.163.197 with SMTP id yk5mr24557083pab.37.1445119346532; Sat, 17 Oct 2015 15:02:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [100.79.91.19] ([223.227.112.23]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id dg2sm28270774pbb.9.2015.10.17.15.02.22 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 17 Oct 2015 15:02:25 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 03:32:14 +0530
Message-ID: <sdkhky5auim3htn4nhonv25t.1445119334237@email.android.com>
From: Manav Bhatia <manav@ionosnetworks.com>
To: rgandhi@cisco.com, Frederic Jounay <frederic.jounay@orange.ch>, mtaillon@cisco.com, "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>, "Tarek Saad (tsaad)" <tsaad@cisco.com>, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--_com.android.email_1052934288512570"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/hOb6gIfNa_xYXe4zkyROzOUFWZY>
Cc: teas-chairs@ietf.org, teas@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-lsp-fastreroute
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 22:02:29 -0000

No IPR from my side.

Thanks, Manav

--
Thumb typed by Manav

On 18-Oct-2015 1:06 am, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Authors, Contributors, (and TEAS WG),
>
> As part of the preparation for WG Last Call:
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
>
>   Please state either:
>
>   "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>   or
>   "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>
>    If yes to the above, please state either:
>
>   "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>   or
>   "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
>   If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
>   appropriate.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS
> MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
>
> If you are on the TEAS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules
> which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of
> others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any
> contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR.  For more
> information, please see the RFCs listed above and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
> Thank you,
> - TEAS WG Chairs
>
> PS: Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.