[Teas] RSVP-TE P2MP optimizations for RMR

"Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzhang@juniper.net> Wed, 06 February 2019 21:10 UTC

Return-Path: <zzhang@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49EBD130ED6 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 13:10:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.254
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.254 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, KHOP_DYNAMIC=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0BdG3OW91LFP for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 13:10:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com [67.231.152.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B18E412D4F3 for <teas@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 13:10:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108163.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x16L72K4004821 for <teas@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 13:10:32 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=gFwxnrCDX46xp22Tb6s2EqflqAsQRlhi+czw/lcjpKY=; b=sCFrupVj/3lYI8URNri19C7CaORdjogeLdqmAHKHNhqd9fP8/CFpMeJ22/D+K2DXq9NX APoF5/6jkWZEhT+E0RRP8P1xvf9sZR/NdlHZfBpdAhaARFaZVe5zGJnq18AB2KDW0EVZ V41s/zRzIKgq36IonPO+ySpvWX7Uy9uPytcUg6OwnS0zMz/KLlzPG9s5EGo9vc7bxfDU xR4DIsUe9Y84AgAKyrFBrxUYCJWgX/NrrWFQoI/Ot14mvgl7p4CBn5ydQRAoHiur9lEI EbXteFIRYg8Z4OBCEu4Z40JIlimjv5ItGCMmRXFdIW9m/Mn3pVlvxEQuIiqTD5yc5bSt rA==
Received: from nam04-sn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sn1nam04lp2055.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.44.55]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2qg5cug5m7-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <teas@ietf.org>; Wed, 06 Feb 2019 13:10:32 -0800
Received: from CO2PR05MB2455.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.166.95.137) by CO2PR05MB2741.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.166.200.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1601.17; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 21:10:30 +0000
Received: from CO2PR05MB2455.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::58b5:43a2:6964:5583]) by CO2PR05MB2455.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::58b5:43a2:6964:5583%10]) with mapi id 15.20.1601.016; Wed, 6 Feb 2019 21:10:30 +0000
From: "Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang" <zzhang@juniper.net>
To: "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: RSVP-TE P2MP optimizations for RMR
Thread-Index: AdS+X1lDWIb2e6pLS1uTeUY8Inncvw==
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 21:10:30 +0000
Message-ID: <CO2PR05MB24558223293DB8FFD9AFF7C0D46F0@CO2PR05MB2455.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.1.100.23
dlp-reaction: no-action
x-originating-ip: [24.218.241.3]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CO2PR05MB2741; 6:t3uywoIR04MyR/HuLzNkEeUUriLfHTaGfphEnvVO0kG/22EdGrF/hVbbKiMgw7t4iU9NqKR/NtnVLY0y7719HQTjvWEF1kBJF/P3ckZeFwsBeTTj6j09CN3B/KqvfZSrDl4K2jMirIrnw7LxP8n4AKB35xrgngj5Gij9m/M45SV5N67jqus/6ntGiRw9P3yZrB96laD3GvqTjG9Vh/0XRbWl7KcjRzxa+935D32EeU3wpZX40KvaEeWzcRbc5qjt53s9Xm1std1uFri2PLPLakU6Ndpp7KGTkVWv0a/emN46+BFoC/TkjHm/W8I+bMxJSAzfkmHK6k1VI8c5jOpQEFWbzuIP8GUTNrc37hFY42qRmw9DAKApjtD/jFeC8lL6FJZl5keEZ2FN2/Ichi7aYWBu8D5kjpHfn1Hmv0wZv8MQJ5LBB2DkhBnE+O730nSp64wlS/oeVW8xAobiULyBaw==; 5:8rtvtS1xrRVV0Ux9HKcjvpyx7OUsRgkvpVgEr8ma5kq5Q78slRHc8sv5dPn3Z/CH4zCWynBtXCnRzejsUOoP7M2onH3bOGw5AnmyhkdJrstltQz8cAdgUAIamIQGrUwRmsHYItotLKnFNEmjpGMG9RSRTZFHNOVzfUiT9L5Q0RLOwE695MCRts2yXvqkIlAALSidlKo5QD28QareGqNXRg==; 7:YRUj0dpSfD6TiO/qaLn0/zIrkh3aCAdUEw0D+cFZEE/RNWAbbKNIXJGLYXuBtvbN9KOPXO4gah2hmRncNAXAxu/5U2RQOlyDgNDxx4Fj3aMoTBeP7QuklrgP7/C6ouYasTc3tWqtrZWPfqIjgcnwjA==
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 0e3808c5-156c-4acb-5c6b-08d68c77869f
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600110)(711020)(4605077)(4618075)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:CO2PR05MB2741;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: CO2PR05MB2741:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CO2PR05MB27416345975C82C1EA6795D1D46F0@CO2PR05MB2741.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-forefront-prvs: 0940A19703
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(346002)(39860400002)(366004)(376002)(136003)(396003)(199004)(37854004)(189003)(316002)(3846002)(25786009)(71200400001)(186003)(102836004)(6116002)(71190400001)(476003)(26005)(66066001)(486006)(14444005)(478600001)(81166006)(68736007)(2501003)(81156014)(8936002)(6916009)(1730700003)(6506007)(33656002)(256004)(2906002)(8676002)(966005)(53936002)(305945005)(55016002)(14454004)(7736002)(4744005)(99286004)(106356001)(105586002)(97736004)(6436002)(9686003)(6306002)(5640700003)(74316002)(2351001)(86362001)(7696005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CO2PR05MB2741; H:CO2PR05MB2455.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: rzYA/yh0vECKMJ/rsxApazYHUq5Z0/zgBUaC9eoFUtDL3qrIJYx2C6iyWlg9Y314mE7eKbSWpTK/KqunQZmAiuv4xBIe9+Zun/wmNAQbFvUlRmtUDLn16Xwma1rd+eZaytzl9jRdhgjWlr8dIgy89O/v76aIUcoA527RLmK10Ppe/pX4/Lo+3fbIZCnCPN+bK1axKUf9bDPhBFk0E9wRYjHetf82dFWIai7OhoymSd7f2Sft1jvG5HS/TMP8a4gVptUTg2NoWhT6+K6XnQLitnuITntv3/5cpLgIzs58+H4Qo4qQTKabJrn6477RxNUq5XWLx2bJSTfZxHHSrPkYiHylo0H0ZmF3DBXPGAP99a7v32xA1dzUbLcdqvKl5etyIpTMDbJcxslm9tt48TrQbAd4tU7tB76OCwgwjo7Biv8=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 0e3808c5-156c-4acb-5c6b-08d68c77869f
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 06 Feb 2019 21:10:30.6000 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CO2PR05MB2741
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-02-06_14:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=859 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1902060159
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/0b_8OEQptPA47CtkiiItJxSccgA>
Subject: [Teas] RSVP-TE P2MP optimizations for RMR
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2019 21:10:35 -0000

Hi,

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zzhang-teas-rmr-rsvp-p2mp-02 specifies optional optimizations to RSVP-TE P2MP signaling for Resilient MPLS Rings. It was presented in the MPLS WG in IETF102 and then re-homed to TEAS WG.

We will likely present it in TEAS WG in the coming Prague IETF. We would like to seek comments now and hopefully it can trigger some discussions here to help shape it better before we request WG adoption.

Thanks.
Jeffrey