IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] WG adoption - draft-nsdt-teas-ietf-network-slice-definition

"li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com" <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com> Mon, 11 January 2021 02:12 UTC

Return-Path: <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 235193A149F; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 18:12:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=hotmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W_kK-sKhsQMH; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 18:12:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from APC01-PU1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092254049.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.254.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34FF63A14A1; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 18:12:33 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=YDBSUVGGIHyZijL7pTd9J62wZKBlFO7YvEAmbGDhwjW1RIwEtQboTidnO7v9bvfYTBWDUhIC0AOZwTEltdxORv5Gc0ykQkKA0ptq+RqdCAbqLmDCbHIhN4FWu70HzlD1plfWCi1dqxOq54P51Q3TeYySZFZloV0xA3sXBf/a8cgXOR4Od5RUdTa9hnSMk+R7B8gE/L2d8mMM5MBH0vslW/GYNk8nwMPfLr2/spdIAyPjDft1kO3QOCjb1DPMTU4ACT73U5TXwm7nXKiYYDmifs2mxh3rm9TqNWRCrZ2J3QtNF58PzsNW3+GWNV0EOLtTxhmekEVgM/Pf61Af3mVy5Q==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=erCrJl8VV0VTQHEkRpkpwY8Ke/N7qENLLQeJa0oQajY=; b=PXCatOKVe6eBGtPP1LSPJXyqGvNbgie7D9wXvE+g/EozvL3xIOjUDFnTwi9w4UgoZg6VxlyjVsyMsw/gNkBeCR7SkGhawoccsy3fvPgD98ehTsDkHd9cZVJC2XmAjoTKCz/UOCKhTTTIxg0QEnfvo0G19T+bCdi/pVJ6oJ4UegV2PI7Jz+p6gQl8gTMdJ2ePyESPLcy+HN6NAgfO4+qBF72t54n1eDhUAEPY7uOO0QM0PE9N9Agi10iHSjLtasQzrq2vG/W9tAP+RcWuyvJTCd4IEAJ/TBo/vhYwsnpzS7XHdHE2s90kpiq4UvmEsJN0A9UwyM8RrJAFSOe4OkBjWA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=none; dmarc=none; dkim=none; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=erCrJl8VV0VTQHEkRpkpwY8Ke/N7qENLLQeJa0oQajY=; b=ACA7T4hmkxfArM5Xb2VYtIOColsf1qsJDjRgKatCEQmrNAvpeNZmaWf6tIY//F2lnkvgbxpvIxKQTVDAnYSu6KwJLckqMVJSt4+lE1vL02KejOTi5V1nA7LDHhKGrnZijIRaO+wPDE7aBKxcmqUBEQ1lC9HSmF1NgHHDJsqR/DOkQsVZaOf5HuU6+mWQ7wtkpeB8LbEloKbj2D5svxCtRsbSEOaHNuhkvzjDcoj1UMlo7J9ICSF9i3W3S21epSbxph/VK1iHaNz87606D1I1OxT6hMVB4vg8nzKSJ9h6jsxeOb93Aj7XPLb34qmgY11FaaY9fKHSE/5ecD3VNec0UQ==
Received: from SG2APC01FT055.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7ebd::50) by SG2APC01HT028.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:e400:7ebd::484) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3742.6; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 02:12:27 +0000
Received: from MEAPR01MB4487.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com (10.152.250.59) by SG2APC01FT055.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.251.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3742.6 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 02:12:27 +0000
X-IncomingTopHeaderMarker: OriginalChecksum:9B3965F1EFCFE6AB94D2BC78BB73DEAB5CA08CC19EF56B0958AA3E5189199416; UpperCasedChecksum:DAA06F1C18B70C4FE9BB8C06C75332D57D8F25F410E58CA39562B6C934AEFCB8; SizeAsReceived:8632; Count:46
Received: from MEAPR01MB4487.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a103:539d:ac5f:dbb6]) by MEAPR01MB4487.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a103:539d:ac5f:dbb6%2]) with mapi id 15.20.3742.012; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 02:12:25 +0000
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 10:13:10 +0800
From: "li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com" <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>
To: "Vishnu Pavan Beeram" <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, "TEAS WG" <teas@ietf.org>
Cc: teas-chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <CA+YzgTuJWXENUQLHrFeYWga1XumA4cf1Gr7DgqXw74fxvz-FNQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.9.156[cn]
Message-ID: <MEAPR01MB44878917516807BF6865D441FCAB0@MEAPR01MB4487.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart608636666757_=----"
X-TMN: [kVmPltENy2QVmPfyPTiKjAlH/rKLWmp7]
X-ClientProxiedBy: HK2PR02CA0186.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:201:21::22) To MEAPR01MB4487.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com (2603:10c6:220:3c::21)
X-Microsoft-Original-Message-ID: <2021011110130272354514@hotmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Received: from cmcc-PC (183.243.253.31) by HK2PR02CA0186.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:201:21::22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_1, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.20.3742.6 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 02:12:20 +0000
X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email
X-IncomingHeaderCount: 46
X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 49ed3560-68d9-4ddd-52e3-08d8b5d656b6
X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: SG2APC01HT028:
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: hx9zeR+qV7uscQ4WgkK7O77eZpl8sph1+fVE3kCY8EXTJJzWwQsfYdaw2BYz8UjOlHZe/rpU54LPhUFzsTRkcEYu58Ds+ujGtOU0Kxx+93Sy4OBR5USPd+iWpiGVu7BW5NqDBOhgrR/lqD0K0ulPZFmgZWX62f1uae7iBq5Cjd4SnNq51kUZ7XJ96+q+SGM7/so1e7/QdZXyygpOayPuue0PnLmk0e/YEdiqb/Iqv/IgirZhgIiXyQ15Qqhd1jsk
X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData: /yVTfVTBHJpnoNYuL2lfKfOn+4W+q2vaJjqmiAi6N/mcdIzNAnUq9QTEZy/3sbbetPFWi41kaDoaA2VpxBbgQSq50Asj8pBC2h5yHnY0zitJNAr2s/7BZm/1fkU+Lp9ukE0jHEoyxt0aNY2vyGf8Aw==
X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jan 2021 02:12:25.4413 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 49ed3560-68d9-4ddd-52e3-08d8b5d656b6
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: SG2APC01FT055.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SG2APC01HT028
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/gj6BISnSn9AuTEzWd786j0PQtcw>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG adoption - draft-nsdt-teas-ietf-network-slice-definition
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 02:12:35 -0000

Hi All,

yes/support.
Please consider the following comments and questions:
1. Figure 3, does the NSC SBI only interact with network controllers? Can it talk with network entities directly?
2. Isolation is very important for IETF network slice. So the whole chapter 9 of this doc is about isolation. Do we need some SLIs and SLOs to describe the isolation requirements? are the isolation requirements indirect, whose SLOs can be derived from other SLOs such as latency or latency variation?

Best Regards,
Zhenqiang Li


li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com
 
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Date: 2021-01-04 22:02
To: TEAS WG
CC: TEAS WG Chairs
Subject: [Teas] WG adoption - draft-nsdt-teas-ietf-network-slice-definition
All,

This is start of a two week poll on making
draft-nsdt-teas-ietf-network-slice-definition-02 a TEAS working group document.
Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not
support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the
document. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd
like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.

The poll ends January 18th.

Thanks,
Pavan and Lou

v2.8.10 | Report a Bug | By Email