[Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-atkinson-teas-rsvp-auth-v2-02
Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Fri, 05 September 2025 19:03 UTC
Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: teas@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687D15E1EDC2; Fri, 5 Sep 2025 12:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6ohUR_SXdAXR; Fri, 5 Sep 2025 12:03:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x531.google.com (mail-pg1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::531]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF1835E1EDBB; Fri, 5 Sep 2025 12:03:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x531.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-b520c9c291dso818956a12.1; Fri, 05 Sep 2025 12:03:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1757099032; x=1757703832; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=OBqSPPpEewpVmGIHlNdRti94QLmEuKz2Z7BOhQ7qbGE=; b=P/MGS+mgP3MDHQ4v7kCYYLPAvmbf1bMd/beh2DEpObYmwlrIs7dAyMZF4TdH65djKY /zy72Ew76m5LdEFauxFPJ33HZhVz2Kx/NL7RWw69hwuAYiM3P08A3am4D9p500rjII7M QIQDwu+3jDIzM1zFRJu8HWMfU4Pn/BKlT9l5DgXumiSS0rO24eImPJ5JBQOG0Hlj8Tnw B0XQUoW6YUOCSkWWMRsaOE6DMdQvyhljSQR5IpNfyQlli3I4MUXBpJpLuVIaDrluMroX 3OLfEK76UA7RN+I/nwrtBQT+tmwxwDtjE5EjrPTiywIJusa6L6B0uhU0oxe2Z/77tGLD ISpw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1757099032; x=1757703832; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=OBqSPPpEewpVmGIHlNdRti94QLmEuKz2Z7BOhQ7qbGE=; b=nNHBeRtCZ9ZJpbp9ZQ2QItERXiCQtxkiVex96+7gTg/jMIBLhd4S93PLTjugT7I0oq 0WpG5ytnh6CZBVsxcOj7B6vxEu/4UEOa2D2UIfmcp45ip55xn9PolkEh7XVxa7rkOjxO M/pDU+bflSoF3TLjC5StzPCODtCsTDxKuzqTODqUe9BY29Fjp9CiytgvpBNAdWdOA+LD 7O/BpF9vEs+4lvli5AkjGXtdl6VNhr3T3NMP+P0IFyRBJwCzteDKJqoz+Vj7+GLAQCQT 3nkel/Q5Wx0ABFy+QmbHpkr7AXKxBri72rgtkxb89Hoen1H34E7gJ2CT3jUb+tRo35a5 mORQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUvmKqpDWnPAaJOBMiyKUwvvULiijIbE67fO4h7X8FGMe4a28yT5Uo30QtqNFBOLR3gErz7@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzha1RY/wNrg6uOSpPjdk8BU1ZHzUzfxUYBiDJGySww0SoW1QyD Wj/t4vwwzWsSBF4+TpthKvyZjCaUHr0AKs4rmPscxiIwTP558ISzwA3vO9leInv61d8yeoFFGpz /aonDvAYEXerSVM5zbF3mK2cnSA7UDXySBgOFjMA=
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctHmkr4fxV2roTyvL69TooTWtI8tnLAiuoCYXiALXHEwlk2wt+fnWUdGy9Sllq RrCXTJrdVtt6cllNMxTmTXbX5e66RmOldudavKVbAjbJCxIP9ciOVvaOvKXHwqO371heNZaDV4h NUt8vdSbZpbCxt7yXO2KNhhRjNFxFXkKuwig5Ka4Lz2jlQ+NG2L+YZrOM3BwOKCCePD/1wAuYt9 soB8blCbqdi+HTPxtQ1L5RNff23jOR+ABVusdr5a4VchXamu6wO
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFYgnuzmnMR8zZrbNC7f2q24egDcUPWSfHi8w/l9SOaKaEhYA/WFT5wSHZIKIm0r9DRtzMl/leIgfDK61kvPFU=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:2c07:b0:24f:dbe7:73a2 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-24fdbe77516mr26940005ad.31.1757099031958; Fri, 05 Sep 2025 12:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2025 12:03:40 -0700
X-Gm-Features: Ac12FXxp0Z4ywDMicVrUhFLC0S3vajezdq-rpEuoUrNH1bDjdBfF6Cyq9rZi0b0
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTu=e1383+jGJiXVZ2V0c+aS1-0Dq95D5Jsz-VUQJPdM4g@mail.gmail.com>
To: rja.lists@gmail.com, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a29b55063e127f0e"
Message-ID-Hash: YCTYPY6OOXHJ6RXJSIX56N42IEV7YG6C
X-Message-ID-Hash: YCTYPY6OOXHJ6RXJSIX56N42IEV7YG6C
X-MailFrom: vishnupavan@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-teas.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-atkinson-teas-rsvp-auth-v2-02
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/hb97wiu4JoCwB77UVuXAZS95PDM>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:teas-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:teas-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:teas-leave@ietf.org>
Authors, Contributors, WG, In preparation for WG Adoption Are you aware of any IPR that applies to the draft identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? If yes to the above, please state either: "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" or "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES. If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see https://www.ietf.org/standards/ipr/ Thank you, Pavan and Oscar PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response.