Re: [Teas] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-actn-info-model-09: (with COMMENT)

Leeyoung <> Mon, 18 June 2018 22:51 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE412130E4D; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 15:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.631
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.631 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, INVALID_MSGID=0.568, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jl6FHzOSmnnh; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 15:51:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79414130E36; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 15:51:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (unknown []) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 4CD381AD6AE2B; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 23:51:35 +0100 (IST)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.382.0; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 23:51:36 +0100
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0382.000; Mon, 18 Jun 2018 15:51:34 -0700
From: Leeyoung <>
To: Alvaro Retana <>, The IESG <>
CC: "" <>, Vishnu Beeram <>, "" <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-actn-info-model-09: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHUB04+OFGHDPUG5Uq1k192cN0HRaRmnzOp
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 22:51:33 +0000
Message-ID: A0664E99-0ABE-4CD2-ADBC-D65B2C1D8495
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A0664E990ABE4CD2ADBCD65B2C1D8495_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-actn-info-model-09: (with COMMENT)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 22:51:45 -0000

Hi Alvaro,

Thanks for your comment. I think that your suggestion to  move the ACTN Requirements from a normative to an  informative reference is reasonable to me.

Best regards,
From:Alvaro Retana
To:The IESG,,Vishnu Beeram,,,
Date:2018-06-18 16:49:33
Subject:Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-actn-info-model-09: (with COMMENT)

Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-teas-actn-info-model-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


This document "covers the requirements identified in"
draft-ietf-teas-actn-requirements, which is used as a Normative reference, but
it looks like it won't be published after all [1].  The framework document
(draft-ietf-teas-actn-framework) does not depend normatively on the
requirements; it seems like it should be possible for this document to not
depend on them either.