Re: [Teas] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-actn-info-model-09: (with COMMENT)

Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com> Mon, 18 June 2018 22:51 UTC

From: Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-teas-actn-info-model@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-teas-actn-info-model@ietf.org>, Vishnu Beeram <vbeeram@juniper.net>, "teas-chairs@ietf.org" <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-actn-info-model-09: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHUB04+OFGHDPUG5Uq1k192cN0HRaRmnzOp
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 22:51:33 +0000
Message-ID: A0664E99-0ABE-4CD2-ADBC-D65B2C1D8495
References: <152935855854.2996.11422532201960833892.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <152935855854.2996.11422532201960833892.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A0664E990ABE4CD2ADBCD65B2C1D8495_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/hvr3kRMo0AaRRv6fqB3lq5BsWYU>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-actn-info-model-09: (with COMMENT)
Precedence: list

Hi Alvaro,

Thanks for your comment. I think that your suggestion to  move the ACTN Requirements from a normative to an  informative reference is reasonable to me.

Best regards,
Young
From:Alvaro Retana
To:The IESG,
Cc:draft-ietf-teas-actn-info-model@ietf.org,Vishnu Beeram,teas-chairs@ietf.org,teas@ietf.org,
Date:2018-06-18 16:49:33
Subject:Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-actn-info-model-09: (with COMMENT)

Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-teas-actn-info-model-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-actn-info-model/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

This document "covers the requirements identified in"
draft-ietf-teas-actn-requirements, which is used as a Normative reference, but
it looks like it won't be published after all [1].  The framework document
(draft-ietf-teas-actn-framework) does not depend normatively on the
requirements; it seems like it should be possible for this document to not
depend on them either.

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/Ep3z1YP2QV8JkgDHK3Zuw0V6Nq0

Re: [Teas] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-… Leeyoung
Re: [Teas] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-… Leeyoung
[Teas] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf… Alvaro Retana