Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enhanced-vpn-03
"Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com> Mon, 07 January 2019 03:41 UTC
Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84DDA1292F1; Sun, 6 Jan 2019 19:41:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.611
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.611 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F9j1lDDU1LK1; Sun, 6 Jan 2019 19:41:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53F1F127133; Sun, 6 Jan 2019 19:41:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 3B4F9A5F426B6BFABB5D; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 03:41:29 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML414-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.75) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 03:41:28 +0000
Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by nkgeml414-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 11:41:17 +0800
From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
To: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>
CC: Igor Bryskin <Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com>, "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>, "EXT-vishnupavan@gmail.com" <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enhanced-vpn-03
Thread-Index: AQHUldn7QIdQvMIjIk+cAI9DPvYRhKWEDMmAgAG2CoCAAXNCAIAABUAAgAFD6aCAAC0ygIAE/I2w//+zRICAFesG0A==
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2019 03:41:17 +0000
Message-ID: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C927C30DC16E@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <CA+YzgTuYgfTNEX9s4XPAOOA_X2+uqxf7sSWBDtq32SuE4FjTKQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAA=duU2DGZzxuzPexyPzCf2AJWC5cZYXZSKzGcE15JpuPT3hdw@mail.gmail.com> <BYAPR05MB50299F47DD4D75210DD39A63C7BE0@BYAPR05MB5029.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <0C72C38E7EBC34499E8A9E7DD00786391C5ED4B0@sjceml521-mbx.china.huawei.com> <BYAPR05MB50295366A9F676E156A0FADDC7BF0@BYAPR05MB5029.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C927C2FFD82B@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <BYAPR05MB50299F82613D934562D8724AC7B80@BYAPR05MB5029.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>, <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C927C3017E56@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> <BB0583FD-C8E9-4A64-8C5E-068D5FBC5E2A@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB0583FD-C8E9-4A64-8C5E-068D5FBC5E2A@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.130.151.75]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C927C30DC16ENKGEML515MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/hzr6aLHPSzsKIQWaEmtll22Pfvs>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enhanced-vpn-03
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2019 03:41:36 -0000
Hi John, Thanks for your comments. We totally agree that scalability is an important thing to be considered in this work. In this aspect the description in current draft may be further polished to clarify the question you raised. Once this document is adopted, we will develop some text (with the help of the WG) to scope enhanced VPN and its targeted services/tenants, so that it will help to explain the scaling of the work. Best regards, Jie From: John E Drake [mailto:jdrake@juniper.net] Sent: Monday, December 24, 2018 8:49 PM To: Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com> Cc: Igor Bryskin <Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com>; Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com>; EXT-vishnupavan@gmail.com <vishnupavan@gmail.com>; TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>; teas@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enhanced-vpn-03 Comments inline Sent from my iPhone On Dec 24, 2018, at 5:46 AM, Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com<mailto:jie.dong@huawei.com>> wrote: Hi John, Please see inline. Best regards, Jie From: John E Drake [mailto:jdrake@juniper.net] Sent: Friday, December 21, 2018 9:15 PM To: Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com<mailto:jie.dong@huawei.com>>; Igor Bryskin <Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com<mailto:Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com>>; Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com<mailto:agmalis@gmail.com>>; EXT-vishnupavan@gmail.com<mailto:EXT-vishnupavan@gmail.com> <vishnupavan@gmail.com<mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com>> Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:teas-chairs@ietf.org>>; teas@ietf.org<mailto:teas@ietf.org> Subject: RE: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enhanced-vpn-03 Hi, Comment inline Yours Irrespectively, John From: Dongjie (Jimmy) <jie.dong@huawei.com<mailto:jie.dong@huawei.com>> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 9:47 PM To: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net<mailto:jdrake@juniper.net>>; Igor Bryskin <Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com<mailto:Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com>>; Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com<mailto:agmalis@gmail.com>>; EXT-vishnupavan@gmail.com<mailto:EXT-vishnupavan@gmail.com> <vishnupavan@gmail.com<mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com>> Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:teas-chairs@ietf.org>>; teas@ietf.org<mailto:teas@ietf.org> Subject: RE: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enhanced-vpn-03 Hi John, This draft does not suggest to allocate network resources to each individual VPN, only the VPNs which require particular level of SLA need to be integrated with underlay network resources, thus the number of enhanced VPN would be much less than the number of traditional overlay VPNs. Also it is possible that several VPNs with similar characteristics could be assigned with a set of aggregated resources, and would share the same logical network. [JD] I don’t recall any such discussion in the draft. Further, what is the maximum # of VPN+ instances supported in a given network such that that network does not implode? [Jie] Such discussion happened during the presentation on previous IETF meetings, the current draft doesn't mandate the mapping of each individual VPN to dedicated logical network with resources allocated. JD. I am going to compile a list of statements that the draft makes that would lead one to a different conclusion That said, we could add some clarification in future version. The number of enhanced VPNs would depend on the number of services and customers which have such level of SLA requirement. JD So, you have no guidance to offer? Best regards, Jie From: Teas [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John E Drake Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 11:14 PM To: Igor Bryskin <Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com<mailto:Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com>>; Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com<mailto:agmalis@gmail.com>>; EXT-vishnupavan@gmail.com<mailto:EXT-vishnupavan@gmail.com> <vishnupavan@gmail.com<mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com>> Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:teas-chairs@ietf.org>>; teas@ietf.org<mailto:teas@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enhanced-vpn-03 Igor, I am not convinced that network slicing is a good idea because it assumes that logical networks w/ vastly different characteristics can be built out of a set of common network resources. I am convinced that allocating network resources on a per-VPN basis is a bad idea because of the scaling issues. Yours Irrespectively, John From: Igor Bryskin <Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com<mailto:Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com>> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2018 9:55 AM To: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net<mailto:jdrake@juniper.net>>; Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com<mailto:agmalis@gmail.com>>; EXT-vishnupavan@gmail.com<mailto:EXT-vishnupavan@gmail.com> <vishnupavan@gmail.com<mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com>> Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:teas-chairs@ietf.org>>; teas@ietf.org<mailto:teas@ietf.org> Subject: RE: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enhanced-vpn-03 Hi John, Do you see any differences between a logical network and a network topology? Specifically, would you define network slices as produced by the same physical network sufficiently separated network topologies, each of which designed for specific class(es) of clients/overlays, with network resources available for the overlays limited by the resource pools allocated to the corresponding topologies? Another question: could network slices in your opinion be built hierarchically, i.e. higher level slices comprised of lower level ones? Thanks, Igor From: Teas [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John E Drake Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2018 11:46 AM To: Andrew G. Malis; EXT-vishnupavan@gmail.com<mailto:EXT-vishnupavan@gmail.com> Cc: TEAS WG Chairs; teas@ietf.org<mailto:teas@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enhanced-vpn-03 Andy, Network slicing is very different from what is described in this draft. Network slicing envisions a small number of logical networks built using the same physical network, each of which is designed for a specific type of overlay network and a given VPN, depending upon its requirements, would be assigned to one or more of these network slices. This draft, in contrast, is describing assignment of resources from the physical network to individual VPNs. This is clearly absurd, and its characterization as a ‘scalable approach’ seems ill-considered. This draft is also not a framework draft in any of the normally used definitions of that word (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/framework<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.merriam-2Dwebster.com_dictionary_framework&d=DwMGaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=CRB2tJiQePk0cT-h5LGhEWH-s_xXXup3HzvBSMRj5VE&m=n9sCWh1x8RH083BAlFMqUZfK0blyu7AEqTYj5kopZ1I&s=o2aQfkCcHYaq6v8_OptqlhDqzYAgs1OiHS3JnOcuXtY&e=>). Rather, I would characterize it as a set of semi-random musings. Yours Irrespectively, John From: Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of Andrew G. Malis Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2018 9:38 AM To: EXT-vishnupavan@gmail.com<mailto:EXT-vishnupavan@gmail.com> <vishnupavan@gmail.com<mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com>> Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:teas-chairs@ietf.org>>; teas@ietf.org<mailto:teas@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enhanced-vpn-03 Yes/support. This is a scalable approach for network slicing and enhanced VPNs that builds on a body of existing work. Cheers, Andy On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 2:27 AM Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com<mailto:vishnupavan@gmail.com>> wrote: All, This is start of a *three* week poll on making draft-dong-teas-enhanced-vpn a TEAS working group document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the document. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document. The poll ends Jan 7th 2019 (extra week to account for the holidays). Thanks, Pavan and Lou _______________________________________________ Teas mailing list Teas@ietf.org<mailto:Teas@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_teas&d=DwMFaQ&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=CRB2tJiQePk0cT-h5LGhEWH-s_xXXup3HzvBSMRj5VE&m=jfPzAk6KYMTzEcjux7ADyZR5qPrxoPYBDdzWSlkedyw&s=uXdPvThk8MvzKASbv-H0_ekBtni_GK-xqPKnIbJ6ek4&e=>
- [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enhance… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enh… li zhenqiang
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enh… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enh… Leeyoung
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enh… Mach Chen
- [Teas] 答复: WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enh… Aijun Wang
- [Teas] 答复: WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enh… Zhenghaomian (Zhenghaomian, Optical &Microwave Technology Research Dept)
- Re: [Teas] 答复: WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas… Loa Andersson
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enh… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [Teas] 答复: WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas… Daniele Ceccarelli
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enh… Hejia (Jia)
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enh… Qin Wu
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enh… Lizhenbin
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enh… Takuya Miyasaka
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enh… John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enh… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enh… Susan Hares
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enh… John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enh… Igor Bryskin
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enh… John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enh… Igor Bryskin
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enh… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enh… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enh… John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enh… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enh… John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enh… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enh… John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enh… John E Drake
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enh… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [Teas] WG adoption poll - draft-dong-teas-enh… Vishnu Pavan Beeram