IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-05

"Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com> Wed, 18 May 2016 21:00 UTC

Return-Path: <mhartley@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27BB212D738 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 May 2016 14:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.946
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.946 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qVEIuKlRkn3C for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 May 2016 14:00:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A532212D73E for <teas@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 May 2016 14:00:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10628; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1463605215; x=1464814815; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=7cqqfOjrFqTORJYPd3VAozOc8V9+5a57Z21F//ZEEj8=; b=Jh9lLHUNUsPlqpYGpzEB3jLl7KNNlImS6WV6F3CfBs3T7/IRbO+9okLD IC1c2iHd97rR4OcAHdUwaidR4Jl6aA1v8rJIW7aH1+3PGkdboodcT4SFl JKk6tVFHLAc3PpAixkx0hQO6YF4ROapARyyc7oUPsKdTK5+z7latjvPzJ o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DFAgBr1zxX/4gNJK1egmxLVn4GtHyEeQENgXWGEQIcgSg4FAEBAQEBAQFlJ4RCAQEBBCMKQQsQAgEIEQQBASgDAgICMBQJCAEBBAENBQiIJ7I2kVEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEchiWETYR1gkqCWQWYKwGOGIFwhE+IYo9IAR4BAUKDbW6HBwF+AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,330,1459814400"; d="scan'208,217";a="275033647"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 18 May 2016 21:00:14 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (xch-aln-002.cisco.com [173.36.7.12]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u4IL0Eos011361 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 18 May 2016 21:00:14 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 18 May 2016 16:00:14 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Wed, 18 May 2016 16:00:14 -0500
From: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com>
To: "Shah, Himanshu" <hshah@ciena.com>, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Teas] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-05
Thread-Index: AdGhjl9Lm9PlvphJRS+ulp168pRJsQL0mRkQAPnZbsA=
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 21:00:14 +0000
Message-ID: <8798c1b7c8834eeb91683fbbe9fa2abf@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <CA+YzgTsv1mZZhmeb_nDBZVQcopjb6AtizCy6McgNQwgYB42xhQ@mail.gmail.com> <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182BAC1B121C@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com>
In-Reply-To: <40746B2300A8FC4AB04EE722A593182BAC1B121C@ONWVEXCHMB04.ciena.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [161.44.193.144]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8798c1b7c8834eeb91683fbbe9fa2abfXCHRCD001ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/i7A0EbtaGQuMM4jeESHV9Ag-BGI>
Cc: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-05
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 21:00:19 -0000

Thanks, Himanshu.

FWIW, I see no reason why the completion flag can’t be added as a subsequent enhancement in a new draft, if there’s a desire to do so.

Cheers

Matt

Sorry for the late reply.. (On PTO..)

While adding of “completion flag” (or similar to “partial bit” used in BGP) would have been a nice feature
to have, the SRLG collect draft by itself is an important feature to have, so..

I support progressing the document to publication.

Thanks,
Himanshu

From: Teas [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Vishnu Pavan Beeram
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 4:42 PM
To: teas@ietf.org<mailto:teas@ietf.org>
Subject: [Teas] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-05

All,
This starts a two week working group last call on
draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-05.

The working group last call ends on Thursday, May 12th. Please
send your comments to the TEAS mailing list.

As is always the case, positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this
document and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome!
This is useful and important, even from authors.
Note, IPR has been disclosed on this draft.

Thanks,
Pavan (and Lou)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email