[Teas] WG Draft Status

Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 23 July 2021 14:08 UTC

Return-Path: <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC4A53A0994 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 07:08:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ldzQLEuzihj7 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 07:08:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12b.google.com (mail-il1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D18123A0984 for <teas@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 07:08:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id y4so1716992ilp.0 for <teas@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 07:08:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=c+9CXbdqlrAC06AoB5GAYM8YFvHllOM0n7cdlxgHQlg=; b=iczM6Hge3WdkTqROATllxB/YU6uVn4AG9lVo1HVAW6ozcK2fEVKuE8PkqGuOOoRorY A3EugBeptsOQvw6Evh3+D91FgnJJB5JYltXFIdD/wyH7KXwEie1d7qpG2W5yGjc7TTiV nSccgMenDClFNJugmo5rMrSGCV71PsHNqd1l7Z1EEzXo9DQDWizWAiJSpnb9//igHtQf wm5WMpcy7acUerr0CXGNl0TKWEfqXCgsTZB+SuTw7PpUMXjf7C4WmvyxywyawDTYu9VJ y4WVet/5XD/FO+XJjWqpkgaT9tjC0yLErahUfVs9hv9/hVQHIMiFsJxsPJIMkZ3PSgKT pXuQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=c+9CXbdqlrAC06AoB5GAYM8YFvHllOM0n7cdlxgHQlg=; b=kF0fsTV25CIDkgkx6WmAtR8uUf1pkeDHN6YxzyNSEf425/qOqnllGOb55qanCqfRB8 KyDXECrICvMlWg26hS+xvWHNSo1UCrs0BXF1gRef4SplkUI6z+TCM+Vk9ZtwVUq/HiuR R8sKiaOrvy8gDndK17Lzt46kYLSHx0xOuL0WGCI9L25Nd6Y8Zi3diIpbdHv5BvdMon4Q NqdV8SuqqMkPCUgrYNSf9Ft5daX2EMrfmVkCigdiTV+WtMt2GoNvdTNIMkZC6e6m9wDD ejpRMTZsIQgYpI+p5SFzWGc2Ee4oXmiY5fsZtx0W1RsV5dpvoP3mrADeoAggUch3UkWC ftfw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530EOqnBQv8yQYMHF2C0jmiHimDDNOqLF+Atu1TTJJHNy/KrdpT5 m/2/Uuzy+erya7Lq4njs8WMxLimXY9iEZ0eSkcXPdBDCKyjBuQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwKOvm32N9d2eEgWTzHO08B3/QBBDc8drxsHuT9rAmtKrkOv9RBTcmum6J4Qq337OlOZeUydxZ8lIDADBkQ+J4=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:8e41:: with SMTP id k1mr3835913ilh.276.1627049299217; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 07:08:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 19:37:43 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB75xn5AS74R9wFoR_pwJ7onQGHyZjwN7pc1bG9=N0xrBENH7g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "TEAS WG (teas@ietf.org)" <teas@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000083174605c7caef86"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/iSSouTxsR2IDtJW1SjSoSMlXQio>
Subject: [Teas] WG Draft Status
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 14:08:25 -0000

Hi WG,

For WG I-Ds -

   - draft-ietf-teas-actn-vn-yang-11
   - draft-ietf-teas-actn-pm-telemetry-autonomics-05
   - draft-ietf-teas-te-service-mapping-yang-07

Consolidated Status

   - No update since IETF 110 (sorry about that!)
   - Pending actions on the authors
      - Open issues from IETF 110 for the VN model needs to be handled
      - Comments from Adrian on service mapping (with further discussion
      from Oscar and Kenichi) needs to be resolved
   - Updated drafts coming SOON

Thanks!
Dhruv