From nobody Fri Feb 5 02:29:07 2021 Return-Path: X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870073A0BB8; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 02:29:04 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.915 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.915 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAY_BE_FORGED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3QaJLtrGqyPT; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 02:29:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from mta7.iomartmail.com (mta7.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0C0A3A0B9E; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 02:29:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (vs1.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.121]) by mta7.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 115ASwYE016868; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 10:28:58 GMT Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CB452203D; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 10:28:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs1.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 172A82203A; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 10:28:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (177.199.bbplus.pte-ag1.dyn.plus.net [81.174.199.177] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 115ASuka007558 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 5 Feb 2021 10:28:57 GMT Reply-To: From: "Adrian Farrel" To: "'Vishnu Pavan Beeram'" , "'TEAS WG'" Cc: "'TEAS WG Chairs'" References: In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 10:28:56 -0000 Organization: Old Dog Consulting Message-ID: <013c01d6fba9$b618ed20$224ac760$@olddog.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_013D_01D6FBA9.B6198960" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQIsQedEQcbBE6vdDTIoWQfnLCFB9qmezrjg Content-Language: en-gb X-Originating-IP: 81.174.199.177 X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-25942.003 X-TM-AS-Result: No--20.971-10.0-31-10 X-imss-scan-details: No--20.971-10.0-31-10 X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-25942.003 X-TMASE-Result: 10--20.970600-10.000000 X-TMASE-MatchedRID: Jm7Yxmmj9OnxIbpQ8BhdbLIGMNfiwa5NIiTd2l7lf6HkOOZ1bT6psWFW dNcmmUzi2pG5Z1zbD4QrySg2QcGzB55KIPG1A5EN4tu9fANDPbkKF0jiwuWuOLasXQUyGDaEXzw oVYXbtz7RNqlAfG4E9F8IV87+8KunNI6Zse83SgflCjTeYR3AAUjEWwwu715stXl9IxEPXOrP6y uf4c2Uy+SXT/ru9uRZTYP229Ekev7JMGDPqGXR1/rNPkGWAHDfHA5wH3/21xG6pZ/o2Hu2YXzK3 Q9zSFL7F+/GJ/FbO+/Jj6pwifw6c3//aC4gn5TY/Sl5cYQQGW8O8pJojG7qSlcbfIj2Ta9sh80v sP8cwQ4odYefEiLfeYPbw023vELIKQF5X/V3WxnfSQNpZkETVNBO21OxlsovBxHTXJpH4UFdH+G f7hAirVWeA27U+g5dZCybxq9uXHMsMLcUZMcjd4vptQwz5tsi/3x8h/jAheUGdESBpKa8wixZV2 XdhwOwjyXC7yPnZ4gUAF4uBmvRkR8TzIzimOwPgxsfzkNRlfIDOZGFGsyhFbDszp3K5gqDiuuVO WrUWfnHqZD2Bxx5pqjr1bIs3Ngl3YtlkHIdwArXcMY1wgSoSg== X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Teas] WG Adoption poll - draft-nsdt-teas-ns-framework-05 X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2021 10:29:05 -0000 This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_013D_01D6FBA9.B6198960 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Pavan, others, =20 I agree with the three points that Luis makes about this draft, and I = think it will need a good deal of future work, but I don=E2=80=99t agree = with Luis=E2=80=99s conclusion. =20 It seems to me that this document is a good enough starting point for = the WG. We seem to have agreed that the WG should have a framework that = addresses network slicing, and this is definitely advanced enough and = consistent with the terminology work such that the WG can start to shape = the text once the draft is adopted. =20 I hope we can speedily adopt the draft and then move on to list and = resolve the issues that we have. =20 Best, Adrian =20 From: Teas On Behalf Of Vishnu Pavan Beeram Sent: 04 February 2021 13:43 To: TEAS WG Cc: TEAS WG Chairs Subject: [Teas] WG Adoption poll - draft-nsdt-teas-ns-framework-05 =20 All, This is start of a *two* week poll on making draft-nsdt-teas-ns-framework-05 a TEAS working group document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the document. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document. The poll ends February 18th. Thank you, Pavan and Lou ------=_NextPart_000_013D_01D6FBA9.B6198960 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Pavan, = others,

 

I agree = with the three points that Luis makes about this draft, and I think it = will need a good deal of future work, but I don=E2=80=99t agree with = Luis=E2=80=99s conclusion.

 

It seems to = me that this document is a good enough starting point for the WG. We = seem to have agreed that the WG should have a framework that addresses = network slicing, and this is definitely advanced enough and consistent = with the terminology work such that the WG can start to shape the text = once the draft is adopted.

 

I hope we = can speedily adopt the draft and then move on to list and resolve the = issues that we have.

 

Best,

Adrian

 

From: Teas = <teas-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Vishnu Pavan = Beeram
Sent: 04 February 2021 13:43
To: TEAS WG = <teas@ietf.org>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs = <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: [Teas] WG Adoption poll = - draft-nsdt-teas-ns-framework-05

 

All,

This is start of a *two* week poll on = making
draft-nsdt-teas-ns-framework-05 = a TEAS working group document. = Please
send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or = "no/do not support".
If indicating no, please state your = reservations with the document. If
yes, please also feel free to = provide comments you'd like to see
addressed once the document is a = WG document.

The poll ends February 18th.

Thank = you,
Pavan and Lou

------=_NextPart_000_013D_01D6FBA9.B6198960--