[Teas] Harmonizing draft-ietf-ccamp-yang-otn-slicing and draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing

Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com> Mon, 16 May 2022 11:33 UTC

Return-Path: <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE4DDC180A78; Mon, 16 May 2022 04:33:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ot9kCbSnL8YT; Mon, 16 May 2022 04:33:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CFD3C180A61; Mon, 16 May 2022 04:33:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fraeml708-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.226]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4L1xvX17dqz67yqV; Mon, 16 May 2022 19:33:12 +0800 (CST)
Received: from fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.34) by fraeml708-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Mon, 16 May 2022 13:33:14 +0200
Received: from fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.34]) by fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.34]) with mapi id 15.01.2375.024; Mon, 16 May 2022 13:33:14 +0200
From: Italo Busi <Italo.Busi@huawei.com>
To: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
CC: "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>, Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, "'daniel@olddog.co.uk'" <daniel@olddog.co.uk>, "Belotti, Sergio (Nokia - IT)" <sergio.belotti@nokia.com>
Thread-Topic: Harmonizing draft-ietf-ccamp-yang-otn-slicing and draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing
Thread-Index: AdhpGGnVNeFKVfVvSxOO6Hz0tWjA+g==
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 11:33:14 +0000
Message-ID: <5cd5f2fbe5b845d291e7263c53d451ce@huawei.com>
Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.81.206.176]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_004_5cd5f2fbe5b845d291e7263c53d451cehuaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/jKvR7YStjALhbQe_D9Mk08jlRNE>
Subject: [Teas] Harmonizing draft-ietf-ccamp-yang-otn-slicing and draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 11:33:19 -0000

As reported during IETF 113 presentations, we have discussed the mapping between the IETF NSC and the ACTN functional component in draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing and think that the mapping needs to be updated to reflect the fact that:
-       there is a difference between the customer being defined in ACTN framework and the consumer being defined in the IETF network slicing framework
-       the MDSC contains both service related functions (Service Orchestrator functions as defined in RFC8309) and network related functions (Network Orchestrator functions as defined in RFC8309) which can be split/combined on different systems

We think that there is the need to define a new xMI interface at the NBI of the MDSC to address the scenarios where the MDSC is split between SO and NO functions (see section 4.2 of [RFC8453]).

In attachment you can find proposed updates to the figures in draft-ietf-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-01.

If the proposal is acceptable, the authors can update the figures and the text of the draft accordingly.

Daniel, Daniele, Italo and Sergio