[Teas] <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-04> - Review
Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Sat, 09 July 2016 20:17 UTC
Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A581612D0AC; Sat, 9 Jul 2016 13:17:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JM0VBhtceiCZ; Sat, 9 Jul 2016 13:17:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x232.google.com (mail-vk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50285126B6D; Sat, 9 Jul 2016 13:17:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x232.google.com with SMTP id f7so79523378vkb.3; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 13:17:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=jXsLBGObtscOyRwe/M77qvvxeSF7Go+w/0iPa2uFf2E=; b=XmXDvmWHGew5huOwfLl+crhL8UQSQRk7XNoONOQjyT9btYQu88ca+RIdVPDTNqMxw8 TTrHivPvsbLfMBkxFH6lKMcQ/6Mm6N7L0Ma84yToLX0zzELmoNInajh7esqyZ4gTiJfK eqHPtFgFbiH+WgmxsuNaFEmDdiMoPOFFqVnlGbmXvd/K7xHp8s3lnA2bkQTRop1uasyJ 99Gdd/xhpBMfJPg9rupYjPlXb21sSMlRwV+wXNBogvwGUV5HLkKV043Iry9rrE2FZqdx NmMlKaqNacdN371ZK9smt0zBE+g4s1rIfHoALL2V7+UZrofbwBvGkY9EG+0ofPC1bXV8 iRiQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=jXsLBGObtscOyRwe/M77qvvxeSF7Go+w/0iPa2uFf2E=; b=bEBoY/cQkXUBJzngEScsYGKbfsTWRIiH+u6v/uKvgq8YrUV60GvXHijcgvwor77G5Z lIW/w/Wk9H30OkSMceV37wuEZ12aSDRYgS+GYLJENaEAawHMiRNf7EkzgTTcpdhMvfXx St5J/DpVEZ//NzATl9DXFNJ4cgcpcrMBhCR9BexTDn4Xi2334ZWP7ue4p9dz8+8/YY6o ufc757jtZRn4KHua3MuNZiXZwK3+ZV2eTuu6fKzHN4qtNHpQBp7KKUpA7RR7W/tTJdSm SUN0dBBVXRQeZTpEdhIDj79KvUVHajXa/IAyUvqf84vy6DDspNnAn3SBGjNWHlUWJqV7 f77w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tK3FeprXxogDlslwx/Vv7lKflCwQNJFDJu/2Ffv90g+V6JwDxf7wsJp7F9s51as96eiaxsJnLemyayS4w==
X-Received: by 10.31.161.81 with SMTP id k78mr5678646vke.122.1468095463260; Sat, 09 Jul 2016 13:17:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.125.69 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Jul 2016 13:17:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2016 16:17:42 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTs0VNW57aTnqtkhz_718fc3_jrgdeY+jb7ZniPTsKwr3A@mail.gmail.com>
To: draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc@ietf.org, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1143fa9c9588ab0537399c78"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/kD4hrLNEXbW84CRhw50RnD5Errw>
Subject: [Teas] <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc-04> - Review
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2016 20:17:46 -0000
Authors, Hi! I did a quick review of the current version of <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-proc>. Couple of nits. Please see if you can take care of those in the next revision. - There are quite a few places in the draft where the term “transport networks” is used. In some places it appears to imply “transport networks of all types”, while in other places (like in Section 3) it means “non packet-based transport networks”. Please see if you can make the usage seem consistent (might have to make some edits in Section 3). - Update the list of authors/editors in the first page as per the guidance provided in https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7322#section-4.1. (please see if you can adhere to the "5 authors" limit; as an alternative, consider having just one or two editors with others listed in the Contributors/Acknowledgements section) Regards, -Pavan
- [Teas] 答复: <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharin… Zhenghaomian
- [Teas] <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharing-pr… Vishnu Pavan Beeram
- Re: [Teas] <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-resource-sharin… Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)