[Teas] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-15: (with COMMENT)

Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 20 January 2021 22:49 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip@ietf.org, teas-chairs@ietf.org, teas@ietf.org, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, lberger@labn.net
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <161118295166.18068.2560096863622144217@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 14:49:11 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/kVQdfZz164IunSZAzzmGBcz3lMI>
Subject: [Teas] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-15: (with COMMENT)

Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-15: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I am a bit confused that a design objective (sec 1) is “ No changes in a
router's forwarding behavior”. Isn’t that what this whole draft is about?

[Teas] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-t… Martin Duke via Datatracker
Re: [Teas] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ie… Aijun Wang
Re: [Teas] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ie… Martin Duke
Re: [Teas] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ie… Aijun Wang