[Teas] The SDN work Lou mentioned

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 05 November 2015 01:32 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08A411B35A8 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 17:32:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zDdm6FJPnZKe for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 17:32:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp5.iomartmail.com (asmtp5.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B9B61B35A7 for <teas@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 17:32:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp5.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp5.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id tA51WSer014941 for <teas@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 01:32:29 GMT
Received: from 950129200 (dhcp-28-129.meeting.ietf94.jp [133.93.28.129]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp5.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id tA51WPrN014914 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <teas@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 01:32:28 GMT
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: teas@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 01:32:23 -0000
Message-ID: <0a4501d11769$d3f5eed0$7be1cc70$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdEXadDHlU1iNrS7SUms/FbkF2u8aw==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1679-8.0.0.1202-21922.003
X-TM-AS-Result: No--0.576-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--0.576-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: 78OAQFKvFoUZKp0SZ4P+ddUsiSfK9zCKo8WMkQWv6iV95l0nVeyiuAnl dnCH07YrliRT3m11sx60c0H9EuCoHW4KlIF0bhOGec3QM3secWZCCW6DbfFyq5n5i56F5VS/tA+ uwIvHicHp3lWxeMU4szXiVvHxOyuSkc8vZYcPwmShurVaY1hyX4xdVwkeE3a3UyOqrFz2uoh+3B ndfXUhXQ==
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/kaJ8e74hVKNQC7G6ndvnDGY51X8>
Subject: [Teas] The SDN work Lou mentioned
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 01:32:33 -0000

The SDN terminology work Lou mentioned during the ACTN discussion is RFC 7426