[Teas] Status of draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-mpls

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 11 May 2023 13:14 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B46C1CAB41; Thu, 11 May 2023 06:14:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.092
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.092 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=olddog.co.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4iLUGTp-pOp0; Thu, 11 May 2023 06:14:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta8.iomartmail.com (mta8.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8A12C1D2AC2; Thu, 11 May 2023 06:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (vs3.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.124]) by mta8.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 34BDENGu012954; Thu, 11 May 2023 14:14:23 +0100
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E68764605C; Thu, 11 May 2023 14:14:22 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA9084605B; Thu, 11 May 2023 14:14:22 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs3.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 11 May 2023 14:14:22 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (82-69-109-75.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.109.75]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 34BDEMK1029604 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 May 2023 14:14:22 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'TEAS WG' <teas@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-mpls@ietf.org, draft-busizheng-teas-yang-te-mpls-topology@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 14:14:21 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <07be01d9840a$807ebff0$817c3fd0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-gb
Thread-Index: AdmD9QBqhiDZrMqCRiCtBignXm3EZQ==
X-Originating-IP: 82.69.109.75
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=olddog.co.uk; h=reply-to :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=20221128; bh=ea9jGkXg967BIlD1gGQK7 315GIQtgO2oJQ2gEXAZJI8=; b=B+vZkKxfSsa7IfEqNvLKIkHauUaOnnZAQGtMa 9jcjThymZ8byOahOvneZCA78+F8g1/jpAhRTyYezfPhpoIqrwugBU6zsFuqPYs29 tA+0otcT3U5qIPfG91lI/uPP86OzVfgcuNLGcIOV99q+GIlxolgOdbGzGYwgWwPu 9GBNJtlVaQG6qPWWYYWDgzc9KyNqNY8UsUmjx7SgT01/dJZXkFecg6QJLxL5aocM hnl8zTbf7cUA2uUkepSKJ5HuypFluMgQVGR/eToMoEO7xWVYmp0eaV7LPy8i3k3v 1kl4mK9NWJnWqZ2H1RuAJP5KSxQ/TLE7I37JOLICFSuHIf74g==
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-27618.007
X-TM-AS-Result: No--8.716-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--8.716-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-27618.007
X-TMASE-Result: 10--8.715800-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: 7VhJWlvcDKmwHZ1ma7tfpjjNGpWCIvfTKrPrDm/w8XO8GLW9IO2MLU79 bp3V2aEwJFzpPDnj7S68hLStuBxCujUPD6SSL+reWFHKJ2wSViTvQYvK/M6DTNr3IdXzKpiP4Pe mwXRJXW50Xmz4jiZll30zwAKePKBDCLwIjgfiVXFVXhlmZsTdjPioIsi7Sa0guBsk5njfgGzsrm q/d9F7VVm9RBQ+WJcuOvJuZuh8AdVpoazpdN6hnwiiidfxf4KZyHdfpwipSH5JKYD1WhGOCaPFj JEFr+olfeZdJ1Xsorjt9/RjcikfGlOm2gN+nomsxEHRux+uk8h+ICquNi0WJGbYiKGmsHmGCdjo s7Ei6D+Gd/WMVdQD2KPbNlEH56dpftwZ3X11IV0=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/l2hHnVmlVUjjWMDaaJ8azu1LCWw>
Subject: [Teas] Status of draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-mpls
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 13:14:35 -0000

Hi,

I was just reading draft-busizheng-teas-yang-te-mpls-topology (A YANG Data
Model for MPLS-TE Topology). One of the things that draft does is define a
small module with common types for MPLS-TE. Actually, it currently just has
an enumeration for load balancing, and a grouping for MPLS label hops.

draft-busizheng-teas-yang-te-mpls-topology states that one of its purposes
in defining the common types is to make them available for import by other
modules and specifically draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-mpls.

So I went to look at draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-mpls and:

1. It expired in November last year.
2. The comment log points to issues reported at IETF-114 and says that last
call will be issued after those comments are addressed
3. The only issue shown on the status report at IETF-114 is "Close on open
issues on MPLS-TP modeling"
4. At https://github.com/tsaad-dev/te/issues I see #119 through #123. #116
and #118 might be related. #103 is possibly motivational here.

I don't think that the absence of draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-mpls is
necessarily a block to advancing draft-busizheng-teas-yang-te-mpls-topology,
but I think that draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-mpls deserves to advance in its own
right.

Can the authors of draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-mpls let us know what the plans
are? Do they need help? Should someone else pick up the editor role for the
last few steps?

Thanks,
Adrian