Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-29

Hi Tom,

Thanks for your comments (as usual). We have published a revision -30 of the draft that have addressed most of your comments below (diffs at https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-30.txt). We are planning to upload a new revision to address the remaining ones.

Please see below inline for responses.

From: Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of t petch <ietfa@btconnect.com>
Date: Monday, April 11, 2022 at 7:18 AM
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-29
On 21/03/2022 13:28, Lou Berger wrote:
>
> All,
>
> This starts working group last call on
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-yang-te/
>
> Given the size of the document and this week's meeting, this will be an
> extended LC. The working group last call ends on April 13th.
> Please send your comments to the working group mailing list.
>
> Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document
> and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome!
> This is useful and important, even from authors.

It has been a few years since I reviewed this so the
Copyright 2019
seems about right.

However, reading Adrian's comments brought back memories and indeed, my
notes say 'three e-mail of comments' which suggests to me that they were
never acted on:-)

So
- there are ten references in the YANG to RFC that do not appear in the
I-D references (used to be four)