Re: [Teas] [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 03 March 2021 21:08 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDEAF3A1B11; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 13:08:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LHr10YCQuYOY; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 13:08:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ej1-x635.google.com (mail-ej1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::635]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4F583A1B13; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 13:08:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ej1-x635.google.com with SMTP id gt32so33474074ejc.6; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 13:08:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=E/nhRNt7tJjZjYs4tDJxlDF+s7QzgzOULZ43GD6FzdY=; b=WgpnA758sS3asS/NRTyGlZlvQOLbREzaWusNYOF341mIZYikqgB26SpK1Ai16gViob zq9ncNfX+GLtmr/2jiKrp0Sv83UUBZEC8pvMKWO4A+Q0qzpmQO/+II+E2HIQyJpwhNE2 joIft06vvCoYWXnvFay68pDfP0meO/83dNPgh32DtuVeFJ3Enej3KncrQ2BtS/edT390 zPCLpPUwhK7GBWY8tRqR7W1zJl+Udn2V8tSPmzdxfAhS6LLx9/LhHcRyBG06X6dws0+r fOT3eXZE+7TW0wX5mWS18Rgwu3YsmZcOkud3qeXnaNR1cCIDID029OE1pwdS8eYNrQNr N8nA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=E/nhRNt7tJjZjYs4tDJxlDF+s7QzgzOULZ43GD6FzdY=; b=lBCnp+DdDefnJxx5z1dAuw7Xd3hFD/GeMieMITW8F7aIdcqnSSxJ35mjuhNOxi4EDe fVzp/93kpgG0LeCRIxMVt0jixEz+kRbcYzNVgs1OTckDVu98owisa3RoupCXhx+ECcTJ 19hxhswOO10fQT+/2bRzCuXY2tjrPDThPAUD9gXyOI/Q3pCNzVyjPIY4yOm6L/pvCD/j sJy2Jy8YvgJpH5oXUd7IuVe7klNrEH9ZQWweKm+d4lFjhyXIwCz69Z2UwLD8McobHjjo g5wDF+WB2Q1OuTe/4heljyfOKkTm2fduKrpE744YtLw1Vh8+/6hALsOQGMqq+L9N6Hxd U9vg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532cqGF5RO0F2K2WBp4BAavcp/71aAIGyxybpeqSs3o1bSTu4i/u OU0WoDsr0ih5KXHSWljPY+TM+NvJphKOTTMoTpI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz/fvO21tn7u6hjMj4GkrZ1fendas/ePipR08gnObj2VUC346fXksJXEHTqjTjQ9LJVILJtvNlSuZ3ctLe1B2I=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1c13:: with SMTP id k19mr624025ejg.457.1614805732623; Wed, 03 Mar 2021 13:08:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 3 Mar 2021 13:08:51 -0800
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR11MB4337AD60D52C1C68A9E9AA72C1989@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <A31F6308-B1A4-4CD7-AC71-BB6722CAC1A7@chopps.org> <CAB75xn6DydowRwgu6PsXFcPM9_ctx7Gvdmcu1CFrFQ5_Q3BJEg@mail.gmail.com> <BY5PR11MB4337222EFA921DBDF1DADBFFC1989@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAMMESsxB070n8+t-NPEcD7LxLg9dW3gR8Er-UchZjRO=Dg03=g@mail.gmail.com> <BY5PR11MB4337AD60D52C1C68A9E9AA72C1989@BY5PR11MB4337.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 13:08:51 -0800
Message-ID: <CAMMESsxAStnaowVRsDe3OzOHMowkqrFKLrKt3wJ6+SJVmCpuDQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>, Dhruv Dhody <dhruv.ietf@gmail.com>, Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, "lsr-ads@ietf.org" <lsr-ads@ietf.org>, "teas-ads@ietf.org" <teas-ads@ietf.org>, "lsr-chairs@ietf.org" <lsr-chairs@ietf.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, "TEAS WG (teas@ietf.org)" <teas@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001307b605bca84241"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/lJ-F4W4FR3P762TifMe4QIGG070>
Subject: Re: [Teas] [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc5316bis
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2021 21:08:59 -0000

Les:

The text is not the same:

§3.1 reads: "The Router ID SHOULD be identical to the value advertised in
the Traffic Engineering Router ID TLV [RFC5305].”

I’m sure you’ll do the right thing.

Thanks!

Alvaro.

On March 3, 2021 at 3:54:42 PM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) (ginsberg@cisco.com)
wrote:

> OLD>
>    1.  The Router ID SHOULD be identical to the value advertised in the
>    Traffic Engineering Router ID TLV (134) if available.
>
> NEW>
>    1.  The "Router ID SHOULD be identical" to the value advertised in the
>    Traffic Engineering Router ID TLV (134) if available (Section 3.1).
>

[Les:] So I am willing to make the change. But I have to say that for me as
a reader the use of quotes as you suggest does not aid clarity.
I have no idea why the entire sentence should not be quoted as without the
unquoted portion of the sentence the meaning of the quoted part is
incomplete.