Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-te-express-path

Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Sun, 10 May 2015 23:30 UTC

Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D5C1A1B25 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 May 2015 16:30:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A8k_rL8HlJm4 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 May 2015 16:30:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x229.google.com (mail-oi0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD3AA1A1B13 for <teas@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 May 2015 16:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by oica37 with SMTP id a37so92626772oic.0 for <teas@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 May 2015 16:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=0pOTQGCJZqzT3cZrWs+0IeAr12rkyqRhUNgRfOSt5Xw=; b=gmOBd1SzfQyy5kV3BBPXT9Qzfc2S+GoB71obxTQ7UAZdHsqYk1/mWlC9+Yd/l+l7vU 3fib7/M3T3z3eSLutx5ynXUCpiH9AR3acSAygIL2Xolp92OyBWABkYH8ZRavo6S3wpUk rTHX64H7lQkKO0NFflKt5vo3tTVNLdJRQ1sDg06lDFMXgOgNgyGYWmtTzRWzTWnijB3p KRx7I6rs5cAEnWR/VM3sbLny0VB65D1JBiFhOPu+cyJCu/t8sNGLjPM7/dop6C11vGWZ bRqLIWOfUyN5PZqpoaok10b0tFN8vEw2T+acJ1BvHYQWDzeRwK/W86eHrjpZ6km68oZa hAPg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.29.68 with SMTP id i4mr5985926obh.57.1431300629402; Sun, 10 May 2015 16:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.60.172.77 with HTTP; Sun, 10 May 2015 16:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTvftt+FkZDqMM-65t87kVhQDzS38+4OoOe2v--fHvntqw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+YzgTvftt+FkZDqMM-65t87kVhQDzS38+4OoOe2v--fHvntqw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 19:30:29 -0400
Message-ID: <CAG4d1rcEo0WgFXiydz291HsDnuL_m6dRrvheNRhbgXXrOmZwjw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2993a9519f10515c2a55f
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/lvtMZ_9RF9JFPgwaZsVsV3F04kI>
Cc: John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>, Clarence Filsfils <cfilsfil@cisco.com>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>, David Ward <dward@cisco.com>, Stefano Previdi <sprevidi@cisco.com>, "spencer.giacalone@thomsonreuters.com" <spencer.giacalone@thomsonreuters.com>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-te-express-path
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 23:30:31 -0000

I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Alia

On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Authors, Contributors, (and TEAS WG),
>
> As part of the preparation for WG Last Call:
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
>
>   Please state either:
>
>   "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>   or
>   "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>
>    If yes to the above, please state either:
>
>   "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>   or
>   "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
>   If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
>   appropriate.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR.  This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> contributor.  NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS
> MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
>
> If you are on the TEAS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules
> which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of
> others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any
> contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR.  For more
> information, please see the RFCs listed above and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
> Thank you,
>  TEAS WG Chairs
>
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
>