IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-20

Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 02 May 2019 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 015431205CD; Thu, 2 May 2019 13:06:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d6IGsWmd9GGt; Thu, 2 May 2019 13:06:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it1-x129.google.com (mail-it1-x129.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBC8112008F; Thu, 2 May 2019 13:05:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it1-x129.google.com with SMTP id i131so5604665itf.5; Thu, 02 May 2019 13:05:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=4jr3k6zEMPgItxHswl9TUbrkcNa/fidI2/7aP+hJB+4=; b=vdhKwMFMZG8h7TTM+xwZXASaT+47R8GE4fjck2yqQ0pdEF/Bf00VmTHUkReCmRPlh2 qtuFqGUASP6RMfI6FVILKgrxbPjYSrqLfiQDoCF5E27HLwhFKge9erTPzQfjr9n220xs NT0NAlhjzRluGJQYeay9QEdsf7kBAzCnEH8+uOHsQtdCgxrx7OxE3Qfysn9emJ8z/spW qqk9v5xDp00Rvzx3AQGx4WS53RhLA9Io9k/gphmGrNmrXWpfVaexcGquBsYnpLfBBtJ1 xUU+qLT5OIXXtymAZDqTY24TdriCvOacurSTT8XcxqZhc1qm7BXaWYZo3M0ouXntL+/w ueew==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4jr3k6zEMPgItxHswl9TUbrkcNa/fidI2/7aP+hJB+4=; b=ltTC12hd9C/Z+OtY//OCbm72jdcQOXiY6jYisO4gauZdlDlRC1gI64PgdTmBbPNheQ zLvi3XHn5SBCDjRgrGqOWJXqa/IRxySiOjkDNx9akLqCrOR0lbBq4ixD89uU3fbghiCe PoadamoUXTVSz1bopzq7Bs4//3yFXf5fV0jddBsVDtASAn2xVNmhOZTFqbBqs00c5qte e4b90P7DyV/z9NP7I9+tJwkoyszS1DgAlbx3mK3IFXff6IyMGNk5sP1rEyHyQppu7ccg y4qDo6r2prxAFYvfVRldvNlRtfskYAX4QPEMdPcFyJiYkyb81jNVEIdPlj0PtTZ7wkZf oZHg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXweAKfBPYMURYvaKzZgGmgGujWw+qs8U1CmcSZ/a502pkV0x1s YdfuLdQYKKUGHAArYmd5kS/UauXV2YM15WHjwmzty+Ar
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwmUACHn8U2qZi5TqclUf+pN9tswjTZrCnQUoJxtBvHKkDQaVmk2eWk4TjFxNJiEPy3RCiEMIwmrY6szMoOF+w=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:68c9:: with SMTP id v192mr4089600itb.103.1556827559140; Thu, 02 May 2019 13:05:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <155680462130.24668.6177272397106598337@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <155680462130.24668.6177272397106598337@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 16:05:48 -0400
Message-ID: <CAEz6PPT0GDRJR3BJ7mxRiSJtcbSSGogJtPWYsueq7DN+LwFLwg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo.all@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a3a11b0587ed29a6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/m2ISiPEduHg6kxfB57k8qyBQ9Rc>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-20
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 May 2019 20:06:05 -0000

Hi Russ,

Thanks for checking on this document.

Regarding the Security Considerations section, there is a recent update to
the guidelines https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/yang-security-guidelines.
[RFC5246] has been obsoleted by [RFC8446],  and [RFC6536] has been
obsoleted by [RFC8341]. Therefore, this document has been updated with
[RFC8446] and [RFC8341] instead, according to the updated guidelines.

Please let us know if this is correct.

Thanks,
- Xufeng

On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 9:43 AM Russ Housley via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> Reviewer: Russ Housley
> Review result: Not Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
>
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-20
> Reviewer: Russ Housley
> Review Date: 2019-05-02
> IETF LC End Date: 2019-05-15
> IESG Telechat date: Unknown
>
> Summary: Not Ready
>
> Major Concerns:
>
> See https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/yang-security-guidelines.  The
> Security Considerations section MUST follow the template provided on
> that web page, and the guidelines require normative references to
> [RFC5246] and [RFC6536], among others. These two RFCs do not appear
> in the references.
>
>
> Minor Concerns:
>
> None
>
>
> Nits:
>
> The TOC contains several lines where the heading goes past the column
> of page numbers.  Reformatting would make this much easier to read.
>
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email