Re: [Teas] Status of draft-king-teas-applicability-actn-slicing?

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Sat, 03 July 2021 01:49 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E5E43A13D1; Fri, 2 Jul 2021 18:49:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aqXDGW1qU4SY; Fri, 2 Jul 2021 18:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12c.google.com (mail-il1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 666383A13CF; Fri, 2 Jul 2021 18:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id s19so11508498ilj.1; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 18:49:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qMpzUZK/E1BQUXVyHTfvM8QZRjW/vdILiMoQ9vAo2PQ=; b=PmydLuhnDpGnQiHsUlAWok0hnj3deTRlufjplByL0RL00gqdxg6CU+NeH4J8LOwy54 oolzSeemkKlKwh/Fc3Efi4lKo4ukx36+/N3AiHkrvG5tAC0aZvQ7W+XSTDF2eZ5wXBuH 9rwnPSB4lGWUSgUfN/UPAwBxXqtCKKVydkeJhrPn7dJ1w7J6H8nF8+Gv4xbVUDb4D/nr sF642y1KG2DtD8Xshyvbq8osqhYTzWbMwBp9gnq2jB5cogk1PAIQmLQ+6xr8yzzJCNRl v8Xre0ii4Y35qNVly2uRKOCe3yoFqM3VzNxhFyU1kfAFI730gtuaPmqO4DYIqgfPSo9v n4lQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qMpzUZK/E1BQUXVyHTfvM8QZRjW/vdILiMoQ9vAo2PQ=; b=teRnXn5v+qSMGtJgCffFNAz4vbX+U5HnfU1PA4poMloI9gd7WuFDz+r4kxLWljPP6f qaQb08ESG6qRN0OPll6keE1E75HRAuiAmnfJUzMFA/dGUJ+Oawj5AgagEATGhMH3hqEo Mlr7eSLcJY/vb42889rYydAcYJHNQVsvVMe5n4YjcPCVBDQjlJg8SB79UOwnfZdPE58v J/YR2rVQIKXbs/DhBAUxon2dK383inOF5OuKyZ6a+1seRfpAMyfZFDxwii1jMa+6TkiE tJI+8pBMrbQabXD3jyDDrHSOVa8whQytyHRwe8A98m7vli/j2mx0nd96i6bNQE2EmW9+ epgQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531y8CIQVCWuLyuCcHesx6U4nYT5Ift/b9eBu5aTUgzq9fBV3UeL aq/N9yre5kT7WkRBzEYft7+IT3mMTjIQOVr25I+trgvJbTCGrA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzTbYvJOqNTImkp8JeLFQ18qIa1rokAzRSckmvVT74fjoIRKUk4atRYsYdpfyP2DH4hYAtiBbaX7H2jSdGlHOY=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:700b:: with SMTP id l11mr1886367ilc.48.1625276943561; Fri, 02 Jul 2021 18:49:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <145001d76da4$e5eae680$b1c0b380$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <145001d76da4$e5eae680$b1c0b380$@olddog.co.uk>
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2021 20:48:52 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTsE87vW4yKK=r-+SULCL4J_Y=nwFvYdE-uUHhfn=UW02A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e1ff7905c62e4606"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/nQ_58ylGlfyKZ4VZLDcnTWBPNm4>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Status of draft-king-teas-applicability-actn-slicing?
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2021 01:49:11 -0000

Adrian, Hi!

Thanks for summarizing the status of this draft!

Yes, it is time to reconsider adoption for this document. We look forward
to discussing this draft at the upcoming meeting and then taking it through
the adoption process.

Regards,
-Pavan and Lou

On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 6:42 AM Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> I think there were three questions about
> draft-king-teas-applicability-actn-slicing that needed to be answered:
>
>
>
> 1. How to resolve overlap with draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn?
>
> My understanding is that there has been some rebalancing of material
> between the drafts based on two factors:
>
>    1. VPN+ is not just about slicing
>    2. There is more material needed to describe the ACTN applicability
>    than conveniently fits in a subsection of the VPN+ document
>
> I think this issue is resolved. The question was opened on the list last
> year, and there were no objections to how the text is now balanced.
>
>
>
> 2. How to resolve terminology issues with the network slicing work?
>
> We have come a long way with network slicing.
> draft-ietf-teas-ietf-network-slices now represents the work-in-progress.
>
> Although there is still work to be done with network slices (and that is
> queued with me – sorry), I think we have all the core terminology and
> concepts resolved.
>
> draft-king-teas-applicability-actn-slicing has “recently” been updated to
> use align the terminology, so I think this issues is resolved.
>
>
>
> 3. Do we even need an applicability statement?
>
> I think this resolves to “Is it useful? Does the WG want it?”
>
> Of course, the material could be published as a white paper or a blog, but
> it does seem to link together a number IETF (particularly TEAS)
> technologies and that seems to be valuable.
>
> Perhaps this question is a question for the WG during an adoption poll?
>
>
>
> So that leads me to ask whether the chairs are now ready to reconsider an
> adoption poll for this document?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Adrian
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> Teas@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
>