IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Teas] Re: [CCAMP]Missing switching-types for WSON and flexi-grid: WG LC comment for RFC 8776-bis or RFC 9093-bis

julien.meuric@orange.com Thu, 14 November 2024 20:10 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.meuric@orange.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D3A9C1654F2; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:10:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.801
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.801 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yYxH7KVjOB9r; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:10:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-out.orange.com (smtp-out.orange.com [80.12.126.239]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AADDC180B42; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:10:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; i=@orange.com; q=dns/txt; s=orange002; t=1731615055; x=1763151055; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:references:cc: in-reply-to:from; bh=1859y7vv+x0+T61++tzb6rFwDLQKWor0CPeTK3bdY60=; b=EOVDFdY17xY7ELrdsrgY0VQnHgLqX7m5hmhNnzUsDlolxxQQ7CHtOj4i +qEqUbAndvIR5CNNIiHCQGLVzofnXBfJnC1UVQcoIQEKG5TcfcvwHnp8X A51Zc3lCVaKXtH4xMQ3B93GLkBemkdcbZXeqHEtILs+Sgk88gzlDg1Fw3 4DmC/It351eJ1pghI9BrF6OFfWEbiASNjw6q+9pv5W6qOvyWrfkBFxOT2 uGdEs1ccXsk12Y8zIW6+uUS7ZFLTZf8OB4PW/f51jStMQxSi/8uq3wHE1 8Zq+VTBVQ9nFgJWwFuisQA0RB9uf6hkf9LbaaQfPceKxDmTuyXA+h6Rm2 g==;
Received: from unknown (HELO opfedv1rlp0g.nor.fr.ftgroup) ([x.x.x.x]) by smtp-out.orange.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Nov 2024 21:10:53 +0100
Received: from unknown (HELO OPE16NORMBX407.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup) ([x.x.x.x]) by opfedv1rlp0g.nor.fr.ftgroup with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256; 14 Nov 2024 21:10:53 +0100
Received: from [x.x.x.x] [x.x.x.x] by OPE16NORMBX407.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup [x.x.x.x] with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.39; Thu, 14 Nov 2024 21:10:52 +0100
From: julien.meuric@orange.com
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,154,1728943200"; d="p7s'346?scan'346,208,217,346";a="216625922"
Message-ID: <d567d691-96b0-456c-a0a7-6fcca1b5d67d@orange.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 21:10:43 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Italo Busi <Italo.Busi=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <49a1953ca67e4e799531c4835d6241e8@huawei.com>
Content-Language: en-US, fr
Organization: Orange
In-Reply-To: <49a1953ca67e4e799531c4835d6241e8@huawei.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms080005020600080002080400"
X-Originating-IP: [10.115.26.52]
X-ClientProxiedBy: OPE16NORMBX108.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup (10.115.27.5) To OPE16NORMBX407.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup (10.115.27.16)
Message-ID-Hash: HLNXA2WTY3VUB56O2MLPR7A54PXBLBFA
X-Message-ID-Hash: HLNXA2WTY3VUB56O2MLPR7A54PXBLBFA
X-MailFrom: julien.meuric@orange.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-teas.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Teas] Re: [CCAMP]Missing switching-types for WSON and flexi-grid: WG LC comment for RFC 8776-bis or RFC 9093-bis
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/nwZ7_F3UKv7JwDF04XSyJRi9pEg>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:teas-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:teas-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:teas-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Italo,

I we were adding them from scratch, I'd fully agree to prefer L0 
Types... However, I'm not sure it's a good idea to have LSC in one 
document and WSON-LSC/Flexi-Grid-LSC in a different one.

Thanks,

Julien


On 09/11/2024 12:18:25 Italo Busi 
<Italo.Busi=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> I have recently noted that there are no standardized YANG identities 
> that could be used to represent the WSON-LSC, defined in RFC 7688, and 
> flexi-grid LSC, defined in RFC 8363
>
> I am not sure whether these identities are better defined in TE Types 
> (RFC 8776-bis) or Layer0 Types (RFC 9093-bis) YANG models but since 
> both drafts are in WG LC we can fix in either was this gap
>
> My personal preference is to add them to RFC 9093-bis in order to 
> avoid the need to update TE Types any time a new technology-specific 
> switching type or LSP encoding type is defined
>
> What do you think?
>
> Italo
>

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status