Re: [Teas] WG Adoption poll - draft-nsdt-teas-ns-framework-04

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Mon, 21 September 2020 13:40 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4A053A0EFB for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 06:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=labn.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J-mFgSh9QqTS for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 06:40:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.39.168]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DCE83A0EF2 for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 06:40:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmgw12.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.9.0.12]) by gproxy6.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF7D1E06F4 for <teas@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 07:40:18 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id KM3GkOkbrWYdhKM3Gk3PHc; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 07:40:18 -0600
X-Authority-Reason: nr=8
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=Lu+8NEVc c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10:nop_ipv6 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10:nop_charset_1 a=reM5J-MqmosA:10:nop_rcvd_month_year a=Vy_oeq2dmq0A:10:endurance_base64_authed_username_1 a=39pRkHAvLB95V41xcY4A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10:nop_charset_2
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:References:Cc:To:From:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=05ikEuJL/f5iTaG+CdSvNlbRRukefwCjfZE95pGLVL0=; b=JZYIqVbhgI8agANcddODiDLDYG 2IOGwLh4R6HEH5bC2xUPMFqbZMWPkZeYQvR3/OYFXt1UnXvbWlRrSLYB0QJOEKadFLeVcCTjwqJEP CZ7i3nziIT8i2ARLVhoCr1sWp;
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (port=40061 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1kKM3G-002MHk-J3; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 07:40:18 -0600
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
To: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <80bbf3e7-4e59-0724-8a1d-9a541302dc1b@labn.net>
Message-ID: <124b0f5e-cf2c-d2a3-7783-be94a58a1521@labn.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:40:16 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <80bbf3e7-4e59-0724-8a1d-9a541302dc1b@labn.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box313.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - labn.net
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-Source-L: Yes
X-Exim-ID: 1kKM3G-002MHk-J3
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: ([IPv6:::1]) [127.0.0.1]:40061
X-Source-Auth: lberger@labn.net
X-Email-Count: 1
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/oJ5vFoFK6sdCuKhKgagDoPvUQ-4>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG Adoption poll - draft-nsdt-teas-ns-framework-04
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:40:21 -0000

All,

The poll period has expired with no comments --- in support or against.

Our feeling is this is likely due to the lively discussion on the
definitions document.  We have been considering what the right next step
is on this topic and for the two polled documents.  Our current thinking
is that it makes sense to hold an interim meeting in a few weeks on to
discuss these documents and how to move forward on a framework for NS.
We expect that this discussion will be based on the definition document
update per the adoption discussion and the DT framework document. (Other
documents would be included if/as relevant.) Please stay tuned for more
details on the interim.

We are hoping to sync up with the DT later this week or early next week
to review the WG poll results and plan for the interim -- as usual we
expect this informal meeting to be announce on the list and open to all.

We of course welcome comments and contributions on the topic and the
interim.

Lou and Pavan

On 8/31/2020 8:55 AM, Lou Berger wrote:
> All,
>
> This is start of a *two* week poll on making
> draft-nsdt-teas-ns-framework-04 a TEAS working group document. Please
> send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support".
> If indicating no, please state your reservations with the document. If
> yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see
> addressed once the document is a WG document.
>
> The poll ends September 14th.
>
> Thank you,
> Lou and Pavan
>