IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] WG Adoption Poll - draft-wd-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang-04

Young Lee <younglee.tx@gmail.com> Fri, 10 September 2021 12:57 UTC

Return-Path: <younglee.tx@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C8BA3A086A; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 05:57:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id os_RFLDDGTa7; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 05:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x333.google.com (mail-ot1-x333.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::333]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CEC03A0868; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 05:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x333.google.com with SMTP id c8-20020a9d6c88000000b00517cd06302dso2057264otr.13; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 05:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=H544Xf0TZzhJsNHZex1HfZ3ZH1JVBJXoc9e7cmvFJ8Y=; b=GneH9dZYZMo9AQsHriKBCEGSoTqGV9rCsmGTGKZdtdSlSRr5AvoAXnGCYELlbG9DHz tOqsr5HMzXZ1JnBD4+STSsrFupEoUnuW8upr16QQ9PD157Xq8DtPLNUUsJkPvgF1/QiW aZGEmBDwOE9PRnVvys/VOYOLAImrs5LQb0fFwN6vl5BCPDc1QKhIRg61AcF6JZzj4LYQ WpIU/7HKjvCxDtlZO1hezuGiYGFFMg7KffMetf7ojIcfQFKr213WJn2LDolU/n80CLQ2 rN05pIubCr1cCIMpm4D7bKx3BxmjWPSn3TGMVhsq/tFdnvfRdYZcZbM1NSOcv6gc1EHa +FuA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=H544Xf0TZzhJsNHZex1HfZ3ZH1JVBJXoc9e7cmvFJ8Y=; b=FH1/qR40twO6Ln7/2mof/aLAgq5u6HXc2gElfURxqJscpw17yBA2qUGhuEE2xL368D eRBqkQsIUQES2Sgk7i1IBvCI9IQBZE6icwaIBDm163uuNpvaA9lPfGVHPGaoilermuSP qtVTckWiw1w9UTcDN5rY0sEqfxRA4L6c3JxJzy1qdLDJzUkkPehzC3CWFZH5eA3KCt6J GksNgPxvVV5UogMetwQIJa9Y1wySIn4hN7lu4szvW0Oo2SbCM4kiNE1N5/IQfzOcPziC EopmNi5cq1ULqDzn6G8iFLeYN46NHX6ZL3yRoi7k9G+mO0wKBQAIUm9ssQZEAnoom3Q9 jpmw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530oghDSMTEYwN87OvoxM5zqpiRc0Qqbf1qCWhemPMYDLSi5BXHb AMwlJK4QNv8u8cOEtUlhNYkt0YZ3dJjSXaWSS8ntdZCi
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxLGZX6agrslING0O862wXGZwEHcWxFRX6yO3F9UOsmJL3TrKRrnJCCUEs772/wcGe2u4ef7NGaLEPcHRiizJk=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:4711:: with SMTP id a17mr4534708otf.127.1631278618396; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 05:56:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CA+YzgTvvwy=0Pstp79UNkjKF014Y=b96=uMMaDU35uLTAVj0Aw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+YzgTvvwy=0Pstp79UNkjKF014Y=b96=uMMaDU35uLTAVj0Aw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Young Lee <younglee.tx@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 21:56:45 +0900
Message-ID: <CAGHSPWN1_3wmwp_8gb014hXie_eV33L4Os++6y93CYX2dbmvLA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Cc: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000944ecf05cba3a6fa"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/oX1wREDMFAVlrunE1od02b00yjQ>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG Adoption Poll - draft-wd-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang-04
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 12:57:05 -0000

Hi Pavan,

No/do not support.

I concur with those who expressed their concern on the potential confusion
due to having two WG models (provided that this nbi-yang draft would be
accepted) for a similar purpose.

It would have been nicer if the authors of the two drafts would have had
chances to discuss for a potential resolution.

Augmentation of the VN model doesn't seem possible, however, as the VN
model is more particular model (i.e., TE model) than the nbi-yang model. If
my reasoning is wrong, please correct me.

One resolution I can think of  would be to combine the two models into one
single model. I believe this is still possible from a modeling standpoint.
This may result in some delay for implementation, yet this option might be
much better than having two standards models.

My two cents,
Young




2021년 8월 28일 (토) 오전 12:07, Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>님이 작성:

> All,
>
> This is start of a *two* week poll on making
> draft-wd-teas-ietf-network-slice-nbi-yang-04 a TEAS working group document.
> Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not
> support".
> If indicating no, please state your reservations with the document. If
> yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see
> addressed once the document is a WG document.
>
> The poll ends September 10th.
>
> Thank you,
> Pavan and Lou
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> Teas@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email