[Teas] FW: New Version Notification for draft-king-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-09.txt

daniel@olddog.co.uk Thu, 04 February 2021 19:28 UTC

Return-Path: <dk@danielking.net>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B55273A1754 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 11:28:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.648
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.648 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=danielking-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tyjJu1LMKL3R for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 11:28:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x429.google.com (mail-wr1-x429.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::429]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C3D33A177E for <teas@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 11:28:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x429.google.com with SMTP id u14so4931866wri.3 for <teas@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 11:28:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=danielking-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=sender:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=rUZw1jEWC0K2FCN6yyUng7CA9zfE63ox331oI3/SklI=; b=tEQ+5TtKh4MTUHoLkiDqwhJY+r7gP0uSAazlM1WVdgtaD/qJwT2R6LSA4ypmWNxnKX zXxs4rbrBKSuDtBco85629trxnK6Z4JiQQ/YtSjKW4WqZomPWHdX551N6fTvbWl1eMpA vuAWApgndlUFcd0RSgVZEzfepufJiW92KSBQdjcuhZYMGHzhbd9Eify7GspTU3OiSEYY z2BfrTl9SF/kcAki+XD1TjpEaUHV3rhhaa2lY8vJjDPZi3P8fjs/7ruTDp0L48LOD19F nCVIyMjdmrg4qUsBGS4bVc/MxKhYM3yc7X3yPIpwiijpSUFghtTDTFv706Gvu5nPONYn NwIA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject :date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=rUZw1jEWC0K2FCN6yyUng7CA9zfE63ox331oI3/SklI=; b=cfBEL5wUxwvvHCB34A/w/7t35K5iB8DLN/DmUqDNNsZxDC9VKvxC1F56jCMCK4RKQV hLNAEweeWFkzRJZpEWhDNx53lvMDs6LPvnhLSeWg7ywFUU0F7+QUmPgLnjia7iHl7qYV rWKTw7GhVCX5sbAfw0BbJroALVzp0/XvQT19hFDDExwlmKOsaIwKerzjCLAylb4LmyS/ s+2xjzONulAz1MCxQXeF0vJ8qhFoGC8k7K2mxB+WPSdcjIqd6aUnPlgq6Yf4vNkRUsbS lzV4c8uRMzyqNfHqZM8ByvtI3HW2/aCQZ0RBEQkHEta15DbKXVanljzC/J0UML31eMoS xx9w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531VGF6LzTlzKhCAOQgL7+bupbAkSARNHPEFzhvOFwecbuEHIV1o 7/8y+1QBpDDvnncMCc/V9waqNg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyhcv37W6S2qDtOmhjj4WPdJEpFQjmcfA3mSoegAf68Ep+ZYn0/0wXoldjiFNedCHBsmmd6Aw==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:60d0:: with SMTP id x16mr937940wrt.269.1612466884669; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 11:28:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from CIPHER ([2a00:23c7:108:9201:4454:36b0:37dd:941e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h15sm9685110wrt.10.2021.02.04.11.28.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Feb 2021 11:28:03 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Daniel King <dk@danielking.net>
X-Google-Original-Sender: <dk@danielking.net>
From: <daniel@olddog.co.uk>
To: <teas@ietf.org>
Cc: "'Adrian Farrel'" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "'Haomian Zheng'" <zhenghaomian@huawei.com>, "'John Drake'" <jdrake@juniper.net>
References: <161246633613.21621.2164345321297464894@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <161246633613.21621.2164345321297464894@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 19:28:01 -0000
Message-ID: <022301d6fb2b$da758a30$8f609e90$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQIzBgWaeNNskx6+fm2nYt2Tohfop6mQSS4Q
Content-Language: en-gb
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/ofIWyeGF8H-r31h2YJ7MUH9_vZ0>
Subject: [Teas] FW: New Version Notification for draft-king-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-09.txt
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 19:28:10 -0000

Greetings T's, 

Given the recent discussion on network slice terminology we thought it would be good to update our I-D and ensure our I-D is in synch. While updating the document we also performed some document housekeeping, highlights include:

- Further discussion and reference on "Service Isolation"
- Expanded discussion on "Service Models"
- Clarified "Interfaces and Yang Models"
- Referenced "draft-ietf-network-slice-definition"
- Several editorial  fixes

Thanks, Dan (& Authors).

-----Original Message-----
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org <internet-drafts@ietf.org> 
Sent: 04 February 2021 19:19
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>uk>; Daniel King <daniel@olddog.co.uk>uk>; Haomian Zheng <zhenghaomian@huawei.com>om>; John Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>
Subject: New Version Notification for draft-king-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-09.txt


A new version of I-D, draft-king-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-09.txt
has been successfully submitted by Daniel King and posted to the IETF repository.

Name:		draft-king-teas-applicability-actn-slicing
Revision:	09
Title:		Applicability of Abstraction and Control of Traffic Engineered Networks (ACTN) to Network Slicing
Document date:	2021-02-04
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		20
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-king-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-09.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-king-teas-applicability-actn-slicing/
Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-king-teas-applicability-actn-slicing
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-king-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-09
Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-king-teas-applicability-actn-slicing-09

Abstract:
   Network abstraction is a technique that can be applied to a network
   domain.  It utilizes a set of policies to select network resources
   and obtain a view of potential connectivity across the network.

   Network slicing is an approach to network operations that builds on
   the concept of network abstraction to provide programmability,
   flexibility, and modularity.  It may use techniques such as Software
   Defined Networking (SDN) and Network Function Virtualization (NFV) to
   create multiple logical or virtual networks, each tailored for a set
   of services that share the same set of requirements.

   Abstraction and Control of Traffic Engineered Networks (ACTN) is
   described in RFC 8453.  It defines an SDN-based architecture that
   relies on the concept of network and service abstraction to detach
   network and service control from the underlying data plane.

   This document outlines the applicability of ACTN to network slicing
   in a Traffic Engineering (TE) network that utilizes IETF technology.
   It also identifies the features of network slicing not currently
   within the scope of ACTN, and indicates where ACTN might be extended.

                                                                                  


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat