[Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-egress-protection

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Mon, 06 March 2017 21:40 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DAB5129A4F; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 13:40:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rEp7BfKlMINc; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 13:40:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua0-x22b.google.com (mail-ua0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D293129A49; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 13:40:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id f54so185048469uaa.1; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 13:40:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IOv+8XqD5sFDnwVu3NIZIWRh78cxCGO/rjM5WrdNy9o=; b=nx26dmBEjbnoyMbzvee+9m6QCA8yM862zJt9xDf9UB6OKmw8/ou3NGPZayyOBDgwP8 d/LgXG6oEjW7IU/0ZEzzBnFH1pSgOlO18UXLxb3ITHZF8b0wJpc6nAwBZNMke2rZvmuj W2gc9GrLBNrKnZdkR8hkuqGBoRheWOdJwguwcozpovGeuG8bPnUozNBr6ZsqKoSicz9A G1CIx+MsNvQ0USsDaIfhugJkhhjGzPeIbKPraTjp1PD9zKGt+60pJg4S34fv7gkFizfm qJHb6AacqUQx0aT3XriMmDGnvyzByG14JGzv1jH3P77Pg9tGci9PqD6chNK/xpg86Dys iReQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IOv+8XqD5sFDnwVu3NIZIWRh78cxCGO/rjM5WrdNy9o=; b=cHFvc8m4OPzAHrVjXXDshzI8JeoTH//PMWZ03XcflcCmHVJIAxzowRCzWrTO7cw7cJ 65t7hHA+oWns2rD51bETkR8pxNr9EbQOFK4GHYQwAqiXTP3l4qLMAYpknJFltZ6Z9Z51 XIWljJTqjIltZsy7oEngvoLlgiNPe0CuiYiyOp96Ch/aT0WmwQz0eaCB9InKMvyoQF+g y+gj5Hs0V+fPooytLxj1OZHNahh+wnknp4beAq0YZ66tPHs6J6W7MnTPFtFgpepc5eJ9 ABEgyndWzW2mFjwPDlTeNETHwb2MfB1lAE4Ri0/lAm2el+/qELZf9l/SXEQTIV8D5tVc LzvQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nNYqNXq6S7zit6JJCRNaqXrNhadw+zkqutx/y4Q1Q30FY+ITcTKdgbQg6ORcrEN5pgiINyTksBnY2qOQ==
X-Received: by 10.176.85.75 with SMTP id u11mr8183381uaa.36.1488836447161; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 13:40:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.159.20 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 13:40:46 -0800 (PST)
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 16:40:46 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTvcQ3pApa2vETgiM81Jt9YtX5WJwebB3qjoKujsZuAsPg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Huaimo Chen <huaimo.chen@huawei.com>, hliu@ciena.com, "Tarek Saad (tsaad)" <tsaad@cisco.com>, fengman.xu@verizon.com, huanglu@chinamobile.com, ningso01@gmail.com, mehmet.toy@verizon.com, lliu@us.fujitsu.com, lizhenbin@huawei.com, boris.zhang@telus.com, mengnan@huawei.com, prejeeth@gmail.com, liu.cmri@gmail.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045e29668fd3b3054a16bfdd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/p0k3lW_LycG2NTkB6JZ9yAIJXCg>
Cc: TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Subject: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-egress-protection
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 21:40:51 -0000

Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of the preparation for WG Last Call

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
TO LINES.

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.

Thank you,
Pavan and Lou

PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
response.