Re: [Teas] Last Call: <draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-15.txt> (YANG Data Model for Traffic Engineering (TE) Topologies) to Proposed Standard

Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 24 June 2018 19:46 UTC

Return-Path: <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47888130E57; Sun, 24 Jun 2018 12:46:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tVFXtyfl54KL; Sun, 24 Jun 2018 12:46:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x241.google.com (mail-it0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9808130E33; Sun, 24 Jun 2018 12:46:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x241.google.com with SMTP id 16-v6so9404651itl.5; Sun, 24 Jun 2018 12:46:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qJERjj1ap/l/O/Ld9KiasSc9wkCWmoAizrKSWdtKvyE=; b=ssFRcWFaYiQub3yWtp3j7QJrmeMXcL5Cy/Zo5t8izsSW/nWoasnHzSGUsZsi9mJsUy PP0+1qoTav9AaacOcvd7N3EVycbnknhiO9he0khSt4QdnYTcVxo8Cu679e8qtSrARHZc 5IruWUd6xkS+tSUqHHntrQ8lLLIyor4rVBdgriYYuEFqaUw8IONBl9Xw8UTNAi+qR0/l vW0hKJFA7mCGkH1aup+ZkvZN8cxVHiDa5OvOTQTl8OKNLT4MTWsZ+V+T7QiVifvfcVXR zHbHYEahDP30druZiucntjMinndNXgzbdM5IjXEiB2mAK9jLpNnvlJNCUzJqZsXui2kQ 7pPA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qJERjj1ap/l/O/Ld9KiasSc9wkCWmoAizrKSWdtKvyE=; b=DUYN1gJeiE0G4DFh6GTcS1GSOXCR/7tnLfwciWZkFqfG0wZL+TTFShm00CZhiy7DW3 iToZQBj0na4rWERYLhjJY1KViW403Bvu4onY932v1SJbYXI7dZAz/qiGWsFh2aHnHkIi Xj8jU1OuNzdzmo50ROFPhoJ810WRoSTxZoCBeVnJ8NNO9IqSUbzs4VVFliTrcS/K2Hh0 ZVaM+1zUQvb9An1f7d7Hznsx5FLEpWYGwKhDVENnN0EsYMJ+/of7wyRTaoI48CphAkcr WnO39YS2wabIU1n9Tn8AHvcG1jX+bAiu6ycqHc8VL8kt9l43AfKT59vJb3uQA0A1TZU9 ZuMg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E0IS6yGK8sbZbBW9NhVDWv2jbvH3bviEjn4cLnD0pl2iq+fL6uo YtS+TgvjJjaY3SGuvRmNAe/S31Yh9xgMWXRNC4k=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKKlQbVU6tRQWhWcd3tKcIdS7dJq0QWi7TYnhUNVTb3cqvThYrpCMYvDOmippoQAIqLI0eAqnPIcoBPxhXjW3Fw=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:42d2:: with SMTP id i201-v6mr7564834itb.125.1529869586298; Sun, 24 Jun 2018 12:46:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a5e:c90e:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Sun, 24 Jun 2018 12:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <00fa01d3fcee$db4933a0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
References: <152648165949.30969.14002611163004300703.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <00fa01d3fcee$db4933a0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2018 15:46:25 -0400
Message-ID: <CAEz6PPS_oy_Jw9v-b96HhEbGxOJc+rBzp6gj3KsM9dU+tYYg1A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "tom p." <daedulus@btconnect.com>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo@ietf.org, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>, "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A (ATTLABS)" <db3546@att.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003e7a93056f688574"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/pKWE4Y84hUYfZSWGovhs4qyD8fg>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Last Call: <draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-15.txt> (YANG Data Model for Traffic Engineering (TE) Topologies) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2018 19:46:30 -0000

Hi Tom,

Thanks for pointing out these. We have posted

We have posted an undated version
*https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-17
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-17>* to include
the fixes for these.

Best regards,
- Xufeng

On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 1:01 PM, tom p. <daedulus@btconnect.com> wrote:

> Lou et al
>
> I note that the YANG module in this I-D has Reference statements to 20
> other RFC, which is good, but only one of the twenty appear in the
> References for the I-D, which I think is not good, and needs to be
> fixed.
>
> Also, some of the RFC which appear in Reference clauses of the YANG
> module appear in [square brackets] e.g. [RFC6001] which I think should
> not be there.
>
> In the same vein, there are imports of four other YANG modules but no
> indication as to which RFC they can be found in - again, I think that
> that needs fixing with a Reference statement.
>
> A quick pass suggests the missing references are to
> 1195 missing
> 3209 missing
> 3272 missing
> 3471 missing
> 3630 missing
> 3785 missing
> 4201 4202 4203 4206 all missing
> 4872 missing
> 5152 missing
> 5212 missing
> 5305 missing
> 6001 missing
> 6241 ok Norm
> 7471 missing
> 7752 missing
> 7579 missing
>
[Xufeng]: Fixed.

>
> Russ's comment about Section 1.1 does not seem to have been addressed.
>
[Xufeng]: Fixed.

>
> Tom Petch
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "The IESG" <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
> To: "IETF-Announce" <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
> Cc: <draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo@ietf.org>rg>; <teas-chairs@ietf.org>rg>;
> <teas@ietf.org>rg>; <db3546@att.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 3:40 PM
>
> > The IESG has received a request from the Traffic Engineering
> Architecture and
> > Signaling WG (teas) to consider the following document: - 'YANG Data
> Model
> > for Traffic Engineering (TE) Topologies'
> >   <draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-15.txt> as Proposed Standard
> >
> > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final
> > comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
> > ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2018-05-30. Exceptionally, comments may
> be
> > sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the
> beginning of
> > the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
> >
> > Abstract
> >
> >
> >    This document defines a YANG data model for representing,
> retrieving
> >    and manipulating Traffic Engineering (TE) Topologies. The model
> >    serves as a base model that other technology specific TE Topology
> >    models can augment.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The file can be obtained via
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo/
> >
> > IESG discussion can be tracked via
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo/ballot/
> >
> >
> > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
> >
> >
> > The document contains these normative downward references.
> > See RFC 3967 for additional information:
> >     rfc5212: Requirements for GMPLS-Based Multi-Region and Multi-Layer
> Networks (MRN/MLN) (Informational - IETF stream)
> >
> >
> >
>
>