[Teas] Status Update on draft-ietf-teas-sf-aware-topo-model
Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 16 November 2019 13:13 UTC
Return-Path: <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006E612013F for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 05:13:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h5t6ZTxcxM0X for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 05:13:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x12f.google.com (mail-il1-x12f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1DFA120132 for <teas@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 05:13:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id q15so11723460ils.8 for <teas@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 05:13:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=TiPOo2Jco+W01J/F0WSA89VVjh1mx6QxkJ+XaIq7/4c=; b=Ne8PqbelVV9FPABc7DqsiVSZ8dv2MXhC/Rz0fbHJZurQiQ+sHRrdKraDNb4e4sWdgY j2Ea7SDHRp41OJkGpYn7o3CKDGfZGYofzi98/nc9Lnhc3qO1JABn0A4Gdc3hilevtBx+ 28tikqtyUqLhTBPhEtw806vHa7w5Yi+/FhOg297tVCkYlzcFg5eZcmqUQHLWW6APFlbd qXA8e/yEPr4P0KlGI48hQAe1cq3zHkuMoTFGNbBLMuLNBUL/YkSsD15O/ESa5nWjNwYm 58FAHNcDtxlg7T0sdbQXViVotxBd+RGZs7zP+Zcukd81tY8uiJrCAleE1rmRwOpymtSA 7s5g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=TiPOo2Jco+W01J/F0WSA89VVjh1mx6QxkJ+XaIq7/4c=; b=f9QE0MguYEHaYYAyPqG8ZX5vKkFDyqWOU69Njqt2469mMVhtnRt9Z9dF99ndiaodOz bINgwPR0FSEVHmoFHpkPoE6T2ADbV5dY7jKH8mBVMzONZ/FyNsUJ3qtXolm3MAYQI5Rk Yagyaof9v5F93kFz/NvdnsEX7ZBJRMRxYFRckCbN6kJdzORRQNixgPQeGXz0hLvlFFQ9 u7F1Rpu3sCJQKrZb/G1GDeQFcSvNKpTOI3TImUjXzcGrylXq1K5fhU9ND2nx91VCncb1 tPlOzWgAVIlX3dbGUkmFLBpCE0P7q1PpnWWcenAq1aYZBL/r5OuRzBzqKVRiOYZ8V/cs 6wVQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVWttxZ40x7to+zKS75S+biVavdH8RSTrYXMkJlY7LVtO94UIs/ Uzlm68i2KITMVEakCi63nLUxt7flzjZokkaQ5qlEi0tn
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwB3rIkdNxx8rb9J4MS6EG3TezHqJ5jH1xZF2Yzt4cYyZJ9kZzlaU2lLw13i6j1QI7Ch0szeZVgnfkaTO9dDHg=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:ba1b:: with SMTP id o27mr6460309ili.269.1573909987733; Sat, 16 Nov 2019 05:13:07 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Xufeng Liu <xufeng.liu.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 08:12:56 -0500
Message-ID: <CAEz6PPSeEo2o4fmgzv9HsiXMCzELWAd1xZWNrFU36b7Oz+0m1g@mail.gmail.com>
To: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ba381c0597767936"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/pg87gnhzC3YwzEMUDk2hdkEWp48>
Subject: [Teas] Status Update on draft-ietf-teas-sf-aware-topo-model
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 13:13:10 -0000
Current Status:
* Posted draft-ietf-teas-sf-aware-topo-model-04
- The updated document now aligns with the latest versions of
referenced documents, including draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo,
RFC8340, RFC8342, RFC8345, and RFC8459.
- A large portion of the review comments from Tom Petch have been
addressed.
- The comments on the CSO DC module and its related descriptions
are yet to be addressed.
Open Issues:
* None.
Next Steps:
* Address the remaining review comments from Tom Petch.
* Update the section of Security Considerations according to latest
guidelines.
* Get further reviews.
* YANG doctor's review.
* Working Group Last Call after completing above.
Thanks,
- Xufeng