Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-11.txt
Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Fri, 27 August 2021 05:37 UTC
Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E4F23A1981 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 22:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.087
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.087 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uo6jFN-vC6xc for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 22:37:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1033.google.com (mail-pj1-x1033.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1033]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F1C03A197E for <teas@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 22:37:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1033.google.com with SMTP id 28-20020a17090a031cb0290178dcd8a4d1so7330794pje.0 for <teas@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 22:37:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uk8TClJYYH6EZJfebVsYv0ry9Z9N9px89T2EYHdDCr8=; b=XPNLRKteFK5kvNwO8oVQcjehMVyD/Tz+yTUpRaALPyc6Sb1sba8mLNQcdoD0ccqQma ZZMUBpthhMEfNSbBVE2ckPkT5SQ6BGz9tfeHge4FxHB9JeXKvNli5tyb1QMDGnWa+1dK gUN6fQNr9fceYXlZjKZ+A+z2mpWUkl8Chkqvsq+HrZj/l31MvENE3T0x/6qjiNikT7NR V16YODkoZZ8c0xGU9gINYsNdRx7MZ8tO2lWf1b5rO3GVKB8r9wyNclsTz5qPS5P44enX lXzTb0Vv+qa0Q+8IHz4S9TahfQx82ZnSj3hStxa2umHlmnAVd88MomP9ndzCT7gHMfbm yUTA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uk8TClJYYH6EZJfebVsYv0ry9Z9N9px89T2EYHdDCr8=; b=ty6B3u3ktsJuOP5jtS7jZ4qqJhzucVISTX77dCXSRnpJHJMNxkxCjHRNP2aB40dDa5 rasS13TbZd8XvVx537L7O2FprhoLQ+8rIuBWGyLEEg0kop11J+vq3OMXt51nb7rsN/Ox IHFK9H9ZRCSg3kXtAsrLfZ63hsclgQ7p3LqGzdvcYIXQB3cJHCFB+CplIeN35iN2dL/M LK939B0Q+LY3ILDtnc79tqluZsj6yiS8II9M/LgwVKs6M101L9WB4fFJCXxX2U9h3vPd sSwfNEFXrfLBN6Zr46Rf8w1DdIiPwMHr2leK6GYr6eWH4wkxUPrHsucxyY2R88jaKDOL EZIA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532j0SqNh9jFc/E6hS9g2IacHeUu98lyEapma4xNN6Ey3LI3KXCg u75M0CNEoR7f40TCflp8nlyZ6kH1/+aG/ck3rm+QBnOI
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzFUqc85fpjGP1344yco5mZ6wy1Yw7EDKRS+d3j3rIeaKmyVLYCTwwomBYLXs67LXuRWWFQiYfXigDHayryLwI=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:930e:: with SMTP id p14mr8659342pjo.132.1630042635931; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 22:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <161781991426.15865.4191431758501856588@ietfa.amsl.com> <06a201d72be3$8e1e9b20$aa5bd160$@olddog.co.uk> <2544_1620053359_60900D6F_2544_75_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933035375DEC@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <0c1401d749b1$4ea76030$ebf62090$@olddog.co.uk> <14245_1621350034_60A3D692_14245_28_4_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93303538A62A@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CABNhwV3KtCQ_TPef6CPWgCBP8WRo+78Wg1VKtZn2xbKbJskjSA@mail.gmail.com> <CABNhwV1+_8acwEDB8fKLrep-XrQv-aAyUyOwKw_=hPsQGJ6wew@mail.gmail.com> <CABNhwV3axmOQq4Kx7OpGkqJ73XUbBV-qHuAjm7H6csHHWos_aA@mail.gmail.com> <28120_1622648051_60B7A4F3_28120_323_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933035396565@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CABNhwV0jJQM4ekEwZHZRctuVSV-FbHBdLb7L7YbGNi01W6iAdg@mail.gmail.com> <18050_1622649918_60B7AC3E_18050_424_1_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93303539659B@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CABNhwV1NaFCLeOqaDoo-bPwtO5LHoSBqut5tJEZsr5OSBFGeXQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABNhwV1NaFCLeOqaDoo-bPwtO5LHoSBqut5tJEZsr5OSBFGeXQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 01:37:04 -0400
Message-ID: <CABNhwV09Wj263juo-E=iP9nSn7YieZM4HUjbnx27YwiLF73S8A@mail.gmail.com>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
Cc: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004894d105ca83e03f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/pgZ2V-9JaW1QZRz-wA03u8zbkdY>
Subject: Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-11.txt
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 05:37:25 -0000
Hi Adrian Just checking if you had a chance to review my updates after Meds, I believe it was in early June. Kind Regards Gyan On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 5:00 PM Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> wrote: > > Agreed. I agree with your counter proposal using IP/MPLS in abstract and > not diving in till the introduction and beyond. > > Kind Regards > > Gyan > > > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 12:05 PM <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote: > >> Re-, >> >> >> >> I see. Thanks. >> >> >> >> Assuming we do have a clear definition of each of the domains you >> mentioned (and I must admit I have troubles with some of them) and that we >> are able to call out TE specifics for each of them, then it is definitely >> worth to discuss them in the core of the document. >> >> >> >> I don’t think the abstract is the right place to dive into this and catch >> subtleties, hence the counter proposal in my previous message to just refer >> to single domain + inter-domain. >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Med >> >> >> >> *De :* Teas [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org] *De la part de* Gyan Mishra >> *Envoyé :* mercredi 2 juin 2021 17:51 >> >> >> *À :* BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> >> *Cc :* adrian@olddog.co.uk; teas@ietf.org >> *Objet :* Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-11.txt >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi Med >> >> >> >> In the proposal I defined the three types of networks and the one aspect >> where they greatly differ is that the internet is not a closed domain where >> the other two are closed domains and so the problems being solved as well >> as solutions vary greatly. I added quite a bit of verbiage in the proposal >> into the abstract as well as introduction to further define the three >> network types. >> >> >> >> I think if it was just semantics then I agree IP/MPLS would cover but as >> I am definitely there real world cases that operators have to deal with I >> think it’s better to spell out explicitly. >> >> >> >> Kind Regards >> >> >> >> Gyan >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 11:34 AM <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Gyan, >> >> >> >> I’m not Adrian but I have one quick comment about your proposal to tweak >> the abstract to: “This document describes the principles of traffic >> engineering (TE) in the public internet domain, private domain with public >> customers , and internal intranet domain…”. I do agree with you that the >> use of “Internet TE” in the document is confusing but I’m afraid that >> “public Internet domain” and “internal intranet domain” may not help >> increasing clarity. Instead I would suggest something such as the following: >> >> >> >> “This document describes the principles of traffic engineering (TE) in >> IP/MPLS networks. These principles can be applied within limited domains >> (e.g., an autonomous system) or span multiple domains (e.g., Internet)…“ >> >> >> >> The title can be updated as well. >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Med >> >> >> >> *De :* Teas [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org] *De la part de* Gyan Mishra >> *Envoyé :* mercredi 2 juin 2021 04:19 >> *À :* BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> >> *Cc :* adrian@olddog.co.uk; teas@ietf.org >> >> >> *Objet :* Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-11.txt >> >> >> >> Hi Adrian >> >> >> >> Just checking if you had any questions related to the feedback on my >> review. >> >> >> >> Thank you >> >> >> >> Gyan >> >> >> >> On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 11:52 PM Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Adrian >> >> >> >> Attached is the review of 3272bis version 11 word document with comments >> along the side. >> >> >> >> I added some verbiage in the abstract & introduction section describing >> the three operator environments that exist 1. Public internet, 2. Private >> domain with external customers, 3. Internal corporate intranet domain >> >> Throughout the draft I changed "internet traffic engineering" to "traffic >> engineering" as there are three unique use cases of traffic engineering >> which I described each in detail. >> >> >> >> Also once "traffic engineering (TE) referred to traffic engineering as >> "TE" is noted I believe my comment is in the intro section that we should >> not have to spell TE out explicitly each time throughout the draft except >> when a sentence starts with "traffic engineering". >> >> >> >> Some minor comments throughout the draft. >> >> >> >> Under the protection section I mentioned local protection which I think >> should be mentioned LFA, RLFA, TI-LFA. >> >> >> >> Section 6.2 - I had some comments related to ECMP that if you would like >> I can do a write-up on ECMP. >> >> >> >> Under 4.1.16 SR-MPLS is mentioned but not SRv6 so I thought it may be >> worthwhile to mention SRv6 as uses SR-TE steering even though not mpls >> based but as another form of steering using IPv6 data plane. >> >> >> >> Lastly, >> >> >> >> I noticed Multicast was not mentioned under IETF projects section or >> anywhere else in the draft. I can add some verbiage to a section and talk >> about P2MP TE & replication sid. I did not comment on this in the draft as >> no multicast section exists. >> >> >> >> Kind Regards >> >> >> >> Gyan >> >> >> >> On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 11:26 AM Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Adrian >> >> >> >> I see you published a version 12. I went through all of MEDs updates in >> version 11 and ensured that my updates are mutually exclusive no overlap of >> MEDs updates. >> >> >> >> I built my updated on version 11. I am almost done and will send out >> tomorrow night. >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> Gyan >> >> >> >> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 11:00 AM <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Adrian, >> >> Thank you for the replies. Here is some few follow-up points: >> >> * s/within the control plane or by controllers/within the control or >> management plane >> >> * "I'm not clear about the term "resource-based access control". Do you >> mean "policing"? If so, yes. Policing is mentioned just two sentences later" >> >> I actually meant resource-based admission control. This is now covered by >> the new section you added. Thanks. >> >> * " The word "economically" is, I think, giving you a different meaning >> to what is intended. I think the word is not intended to just mean >> "financially economical", but also to mean "not wasteful or profligate." >> This is similar to "efficient", but not the same. In this context, >> "economically" would certainly apply to power use, money, and any other >> resource. >> I spent a little time trying to think of an equivalent word (because if >> it is causing you unrest, it will do the same for other readers), but I was >> unable to think of one.": >> >> The concern I had is that the observed behavior is conditioned by the >> metrics/attributes/information that can be disseminated and acted upon. >> Optimizing the forwarding with a set of metrics as inputs does not >> guarantee that the overall forwarding is economically-optimized. That's why >> I provided the example of power-consumption. Such optimization is not >> currently supported at the level of a network (despite that some >> optimization can be made at the node/card level). >> >> Cheers, >> Med >> >> > -----Message d'origine----- >> > De : Adrian Farrel [mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk] >> > Envoyé : samedi 15 mai 2021 19:40 >> > À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed TGI/OLN <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> >> > Objet : RE: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-11.txt >> > >> > Here's the file. >> > >> > Many thanks for looking at this. >> > >> > Adrian >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> >> > Sent: 15 May 2021 18:11 >> > To: 'mohamed.boucadair@orange.com' <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>; >> > 'teas@ietf.org' <teas@ietf.org> >> > Cc: 'TEAS WG Chairs' <teas-chairs@ietf.org> >> > Subject: RE: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-11.txt >> > >> > Hi Med, >> > >> > Thanks for all of your comments. >> > >> > Nearly everything is accepted and included. >> > >> > Not sure the best way to respond to your Word file, so I embedded my >> > responses and I'll send it to you under separate cover (no need to >> > spam the mailing list). >> > >> > There'll be a -12 along soon to capture your improvements. >> > >> > Best, >> > Adrian >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> >> > Sent: 03 May 2021 15:49 >> > To: adrian@olddog.co.uk; teas@ietf.org >> > Cc: 'TEAS WG Chairs' <teas-chairs@ietf.org> >> > Subject: RE: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-11.txt >> > >> > Hi Adrian, all, >> > >> > FWIW, you may find some comments at: >> > * pdf: >> > https://github.com/boucadair/IETF-Drafts-Reviews/blob/master/draft- >> > ietf-teas >> > -rfc3272bis-11-rev%20Med.pdf >> > * doc: >> > https://github.com/boucadair/IETF-Drafts-Reviews/raw/master/draft- >> > ietf-teas- >> > rfc3272bis-11-rev%20Med.docx >> > >> > Cheers, >> > Med >> > >> > > -----Message d'origine----- >> > > De : Teas [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Adrian >> > Farrel >> > > Envoyé : mercredi 7 avril 2021 21:24 À : teas@ietf.org Cc : 'TEAS >> > WG >> > > Chairs' <teas-chairs@ietf.org> Objet : Re: [Teas] I-D Action: >> > > draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-11.txt >> > > >> > > With this version I have filled in the remaining TBDs: >> > > - small section on intent-based network >> > > - small section on multi-layer TE (thanks, Lou, for the suggestion) >> > > - change log from 3272 >> > > >> > > As far as I'm concerned this document is complete modulo review >> > > comments. >> > > >> > > It *really* needs review, but I can't force you! >> > > Maybe you can look at the sections of special interest to you? >> > > Maybe the original Design Team could take another look? >> > > >> > > Otherwise: time for WG last call? >> > > >> > > Thanks, >> > > Adrian >> > > >> > > -----Original Message----- >> > > From: I-D-Announce <i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of >> > > internet-drafts@ietf.org >> > > Sent: 07 April 2021 19:25 >> > > To: i-d-announce@ietf.org >> > > Cc: teas@ietf.org >> > > Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-11.txt >> > > >> > > >> > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >> > > directories. >> > > This draft is a work item of the Traffic Engineering Architecture >> > and >> > > Signaling WG of the IETF. >> > > >> > > Title : Overview and Principles of Internet >> > Traffic >> > > Engineering >> > > Author : Adrian Farrel >> > > Filename : draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-11.txt >> > > Pages : 91 >> > > Date : 2021-04-07 >> > > >> > > Abstract: >> > > This document describes the principles of traffic engineering >> > (TE) >> > > in >> > > the Internet. The document is intended to promote better >> > > understanding of the issues surrounding traffic engineering in >> > IP >> > > networks and the networks that support IP networking, and to >> > > provide >> > > a common basis for the development of traffic engineering >> > > capabilities for the Internet. The principles, architectures, >> > and >> > > methodologies for performance evaluation and performance >> > > optimization >> > > of operational networks are also discussed. >> > > >> > > This work was first published as RFC 3272 in May 2002. This >> > > document >> > > obsoletes RFC 3272 by making a complete update to bring the text >> > in >> > > line with best current practices for Internet traffic >> > engineering >> > > and >> > > to include references to the latest relevant work in the IETF. >> > > >> > > >> > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis/ >> > > >> > > There are also htmlized versions available at: >> > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-11 >> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-11 >> > > >> > > A diff from the previous version is available at: >> > > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-11 >> > > >> > > >> > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >> > > submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at >> > > tools.ietf.org. >> > > >> > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> > > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >> > > >> > > >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > I-D-Announce mailing list >> > > I-D-Announce@ietf.org >> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce >> > > Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or >> > > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt >> > > >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > Teas mailing list >> > > Teas@ietf.org >> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas >> > >> > _____________________________________________________________________ >> > _______ >> > _____________________________________________ >> > >> > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations >> > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, >> > exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message >> > par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi >> > que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles >> > d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete >> > altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. >> > >> > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or >> > privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not >> > be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. >> > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender >> > and delete this message and its attachments. >> > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have >> > been modified, changed or falsified. >> > Thank you. >> >> >> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ >> >> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations >> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc >> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez >> recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler >> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages >> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, >> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme >> ou falsifie. Merci. >> >> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged >> information that may be protected by law; >> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. >> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and >> delete this message and its attachments. >> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have >> been modified, changed or falsified. >> Thank you. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Teas mailing list >> Teas@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas >> >> -- >> >> <http://www.verizon.com/> >> >> *Gyan Mishra* >> >> *Network Solutions Architect * >> >> *Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>* >> >> *M 301 502-1347* >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> <http://www.verizon.com/> >> >> *Gyan Mishra* >> >> *Network Solutions Architect * >> >> *Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>* >> >> *M 301 502-1347* >> >> >> >> -- >> >> <http://www.verizon.com/> >> >> *Gyan Mishra* >> >> *Network Solutions Architect * >> >> *Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>* >> >> *M 301 502-1347* >> >> >> >> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ >> >> >> >> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc >> >> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler >> >> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, >> >> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. >> >> >> >> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; >> >> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. >> >> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. >> >> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. >> >> Thank you. >> >> -- >> >> <http://www.verizon.com/> >> >> *Gyan Mishra* >> >> *Network Solutions Architect * >> >> *Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>* >> >> *M 301 502-1347* >> >> >> >> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ >> >> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc >> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler >> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, >> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. >> >> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; >> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. >> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. >> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. >> Thank you. >> >> -- > > <http://www.verizon.com/> > > *Gyan Mishra* > > *Network Solutions A**rchitect * > > *Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>* > > > > *M 301 502-1347* > > -- <http://www.verizon.com/> *Gyan Mishra* *Network Solutions A**rchitect * *Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>* *M 301 502-1347*
- [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-11.… internet-drafts
- Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis… LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO
- Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis… LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO
- Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis… Gyan Mishra