IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-06

peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn Fri, 22 May 2020 09:52 UTC

Return-Path: <peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2AD43A09CA for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2020 02:52:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.885
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.885 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lUAyIVCKYL4b for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2020 02:52:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8678B3A09DC for <teas@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 May 2020 02:52:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse-fl1.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.30.14.238]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id 7E043147D448693BC6A2; Fri, 22 May 2020 17:52:37 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njxapp03.zte.com.cn ([10.41.132.202]) by mse-fl1.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 04M9qIO0056674; Fri, 22 May 2020 17:52:19 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njxapp02[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Fri, 22 May 2020 17:52:18 +0800 (CST)
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 17:52:18 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afa5ec7a0d2df741c12
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202005221752187357970@zte.com.cn>
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: peng.shaofu@zte.com.cn
To: lberger@labn.net
Cc: teas@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl1.zte.com.cn 04M9qIO0056674
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/poGgUZ5zSUkg_Mu81WDccCxUKdQ>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-06
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 09:52:43 -0000

Hi Lou,






I've reviewed this document and believe it is ready for publication.






Regards,


PSF







[Teas] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-06
Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Fri, 15 May 2020 18:58 UTCShow header


All,

This starts a two-week working group last call for 
draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ip-06

NOTE: IPR has been disclosed -- see 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-teas-pce-native-ipThe working group last call ends on May 29.
Please send your comments to the working group mailing list.

Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document
and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome!
This is useful and important, even from authors.

Thank you,
Lou (TEAS Co-Chair & doc Shepherd)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email