[Teas] FW: Regarding IPR on draft-zhao-teas-pce-control-function

"Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com> Tue, 02 August 2016 13:23 UTC

Return-Path: <mhartley@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8128612D5A0 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 06:23:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.808
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.808 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rSQAUEtkjcKN for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 06:23:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D00D12D5F2 for <teas@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 06:23:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3214; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1470144197; x=1471353797; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=bI3QHvGoPI3AkIDXsAnhQTj6tKeoYb9b3XtHYKAV8Ho=; b=X+r4UU96vTkuPGcj3Y3HPAhB2mrLgvI7Pls0lSEShm9fOUi6qJ+fr6KJ tM1j99o6dJ8xnACeyQ8t3Ehg31A1CF9KMltFsntIK5UduI6LsIc/mE5uf 4xaH/ffzedmV7J4dE6OxDCCF3aUOrps3dVMm9ij3vUviPDa0a4JMsz6HA 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BNAgBDnaBX/4kNJK1dg0VWfAe5IoF9J?= =?us-ascii?q?IV5AoE7OBQBAQEBAQEBXSeEXgEBBQEBODQGBQwEAgEIEQQBAR8JBycLFAcBAQU?= =?us-ascii?q?DAgQOBQiIKQ7AFwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARyGKoRNhBIRAYV3BZkzA?= =?us-ascii?q?YYXiGCBck6EDIh6jDCDdgEeNoN6bgGGYDcBfgEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,460,1464652800"; d="scan'208";a="131349302"
Received: from alln-core-4.cisco.com ([173.36.13.137]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 02 Aug 2016 13:23:16 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (xch-aln-003.cisco.com [173.36.7.13]) by alln-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u72DNGsQ022127 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <teas@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 13:23:16 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 08:23:15 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com ([173.37.102.11]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 08:23:15 -0500
From: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com>
To: "TEAS WG (teas@ietf.org)" <teas@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-zhao-teas-pce-control-function
Thread-Index: AQHRzhXfT6q3G6X/LUGgia76AnTIrqAjSxZQgBGdu4CAAP0KsA==
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 13:23:15 +0000
Message-ID: <e8f56a1396104bed88e9e66b32a30cf5@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com>
References: <9853f7ca-795a-4261-5e3c-c95ecd4a9a98@labn.net> <72a7ef400c8c49bda0ca63fdc0a746b6@XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com> <D3C4D21B.1107A1%scheruathur@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <D3C4D21B.1107A1%scheruathur@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [161.44.212.94]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/puBvB7sRP2H5aKV-Aor8jsEqlCI>
Cc: "Matt Hartley \(mhartley\)" <mhartley@cisco.com>
Subject: [Teas] FW: Regarding IPR on draft-zhao-teas-pce-control-function
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 13:23:39 -0000


-----Original Message-----
From: Sudhir Cheruathur [mailto:scheruathur@juniper.net] 
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2016 1:18 PM
To: Matt Hartley (mhartley) <mhartley@cisco.com>; ansharma@infinera.com
Cc: teas-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-zhao-teas-pce-control-function

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.

Thanks
-s

On 7/21/16, 10:18 AM, "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <mhartley@cisco.com> wrote:

>Anurag, Sudhir,
>
>We're waiting on your responses to this IPR poll before we can move the 
>document forward. Please could you reply to the WG list?
>
>Cheers
>
>Matt
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Teas [mailto:teas-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger
>> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2016 8:42 AM
>> To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>; Quintin zhao 
>> <quintin.zhao@huawei.com>; Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>; 
>> chao.zhou@cisco.com; Cyril Margaria <cmargaria@juniper.net>; 
>> scheruathur@juniper.net; dhruv.dhody@huawei.com; daniel@olddog.co.uk; 
>> IHussain@infinera.com; eric.wu@huawei.com
>> Cc: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
>> Subject: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-zhao-teas-pce-control-function
>> 
>> 
>> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>> 
>> As part of the preparation for WG Adoption
>> 
>> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above?
>> 
>> Please state either:
>> 
>> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>> or
>> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>> 
>> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules 
>>(see  RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)?
>> 
>> If yes to the above, please state either:
>> 
>> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>> or
>> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>> 
>> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think 
>> appropriate.
>> 
>> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer 
>>the  above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not 
>>you are  aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to 
>>the next  stage until a response has been received from each author 
>>and listed  contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN 
>>THIS MESSAGE'S TO  LINES.
>> 
>> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not 
>>listed  as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations 
>>under the  IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if 
>>you are aware of  IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain 
>>from participating in  any contribution or discussion related to your 
>>undisclosed IPR. For more  information, please see the RFCs listed 
>>above and  
>>http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> TEAS WG Chairs
>> 
>> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your 
>> response.
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Teas mailing list
>> Teas@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas