IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Teas] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-scsi-03: (with DISCUSS)

Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com> Tue, 22 August 2017 13:08 UTC

Return-Path: <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C596B1329AE; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 06:08:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q8NnmvjpUW2N; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 06:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x242.google.com (mail-yw0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84A26132397; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 06:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x242.google.com with SMTP id s187so2334399ywf.3; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 06:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=+chehbUK9W5s5QB8kqgIo1Pd4M8WcKxJfBGlBCY+gyk=; b=DwxQKIRqOFTDOuHcRNOwZ8UpjptQGBK9RXwYek22KXlj1lylaiYriOa+3lIrsf1Qxm YzmsAGkTMFsbjEX/A7K32M+FaRTJNu2YcOMt0jPNvtcswoXD/p1v++i0l//ZEO57gOoi uNl2mYco3dViCFPDFtMP5eAtRmgBgWUCuyB+eEPRm/DfrFJ+eN93gzrzE1r/aTiBU6tT Rgbg5jM8CPH14SoPGivGgfwuzRWv6WV+55KVNhchpBhTuCjR9WhoUSnHbnhW567RsggS GuGkJ7vj+oIpx1M4juQX/gzK8kQ7SJGB9WJv7ppcMpNkMINyDCLHzgWtyVxgDdCsF5Xt 6JAg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=+chehbUK9W5s5QB8kqgIo1Pd4M8WcKxJfBGlBCY+gyk=; b=Ro5eppI0XIMqGEZwRakw2UMzI/TSHhEXZcNux8F2YNZaNZPeRqBBrm/risrawRXX/g pnltKvt2N1YayZlwWrVZfp8DN80Ca2zTxAgaWPT6ZbTSXcPxf+lsXcJ46/Z9Jp1ggF0J 7VSMYwsfhtOFCu7LdILuSvB08CY1as804TjVaG29p8x//mJGd11Jyp5/fvsq/o7QQMlJ fC5b8dsLVCxNe5lVevBanfVMqFFmmfc3rRY33kW3DIPNRK/gX5aUY/QrxgpVpJqozqNz nQ4VXN+/+vnji29k2w1/GocJc4M36bv2kw53zOapSPzY/CQsnkA2uhu2WzU+7Gi8VOXI nv7g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5iUPB8cCk5wWaCPDMWcWINc5KfetHWqYFR8EjAymywpgqcu6gx2 WoHwH9gORBkthw==
X-Received: by 10.13.200.134 with SMTP id k128mr503040ywd.300.1503407286622; Tue, 22 Aug 2017 06:08:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.5] (45-19-110-76.lightspeed.tukrga.sbcglobal.net. [45.19.110.76]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v187sm3990824ywb.78.2017.08.22.06.08.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Aug 2017 06:08:05 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM2PR07MB0994EE1E3B809FC7D59BDD50F0840@AM2PR07MB0994.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 09:08:02 -0400
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-scsi@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-scsi@ietf.org>, Vishnu Beeram <vbeeram@juniper.net>, "teas-chairs@ietf.org" <teas-chairs@ietf.org>, "teas@ietf.org" <teas@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <652D7481-A293-4A79-870A-7461EC529D91@gmail.com>
References: <150171551836.5679.14360895881912372876.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <AM2PR07MB0994DF2DFD400C4217711E0EF0B10@AM2PR07MB0994.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <AM2PR07MB09940F2B84D45E0F2FD28579F0B10@AM2PR07MB0994.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <04827492-DD41-4DBF-99B2-D0A0BF801CC2@gmail.com> <AM2PR07MB0994EE1E3B809FC7D59BDD50F0840@AM2PR07MB0994.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
To: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/qFSTQwuwsCABKZKRKguOsOlYLnY>
Subject: Re: [Teas] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-scsi-03: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 13:08:11 -0000

Thanks Daniele.

Regards
Suresh

> On Aug 22, 2017, at 5:44 AM, Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Suresh,
> 
> sorry for the delay in answering.
> I modified the text as follows: 
> 
>        The Generalized SCSI is composed of zero or more variable length
>        type-length-value fields which are each called a SCSI-TLV.
>        There are no specific size restrictions on these SCSI-TLV.  Size
>        and other formatting restrictions may be imposed by the routing
>        protocol ISCD field, refer to <xref target="RFC4203"/> and <xref
>        target="RFC5307"/>. Please also refer to <xref target="RFC3630"/> for
>        the treatment of malformed Link TLVs.
> 
> How to manage malformed Link TLVs is already described in RFC3630.
> 
> Thanks
> Daniele  
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Suresh Krishnan [mailto:suresh.krishnan@gmail.com] 
> Sent: giovedì 3 agosto 2017 16:06
> To: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>
> Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-scsi@ietf.org; Vishnu Beeram <vbeeram@juniper.net>; teas-chairs@ietf.org; teas@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-scsi-03: (with DISCUSS)
> 
> Hi Daniele,
> 
>> On Aug 3, 2017, at 4:21 AM, Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Suresh,
>> 
>> The GMPLS SCSI is a sub-TLV of the ISCD (interface switching capability descriptor-RFC4203), which in turn is a sub TLV of the Link TLV (RFC3630) ... yes we like nesting in GMPLS 😊
>> 
>> RFC 3630 (section 2.4.2.) says: " Unrecognized sub-TLVs are ignored."
>> 
>> It seems obvious but it took me a while to go back to the root of the problem, hence few words  would help the reader. How about something along the lines of:
>> 
>> "Malformed packets should be treated accordingly with error handling procedures defined in RFC3630.” ?
> 
> …
> 
>> 
>> Re-reading the draft it seems it's already covered by this statement:
>> 
>> "Size and other formatting restrictions may be imposed by the routing
>>       protocol ISCD field, refer to <xref target="RFC4203"/> and <xref
>>       target="RFC5307"/>."
>> 
>> Would you like it to be made more explicit?
> 
> Yes. Please. I personally think ignoring a length error as an unrecognized TLV and moving on is not preferable, but I am happy to step aside if that decision is explicitly made.
> 
> Regards
> Suresh
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email