[Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-assoc-corouted-bidir-frr-02

Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com> Tue, 13 February 2018 01:40 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7AD812DB71; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:40:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TaYHhPorJTc9; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:40:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x230.google.com (mail-pg0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0C8A124D6C; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:40:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x230.google.com with SMTP id t4so7721034pgp.8; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:40:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xNnkFuIiwosvTG0MFVgd92UVhPCpniLLLTRIMaqsBYY=; b=PpvUB2I2gD6RAyaPQrNFceQH0k8ZJVpG9HJrTi6AaV6htSeW75WarMQgI4/OJXYhJM JZsdMFGyRtTOChXCk4vAKIoyFShxxN2YgCLnqyRTHtAuZntGBieemjA1Y4O9Xjy0D0/7 earDAxOLAY+ykDFTtm+MofywqWkh1MEqM+JtJB+cr6XemNKvMMBA1mpvqK4aGBvhxg57 UzkA1wuSgSig3+diRqwNKkFMThcUlLVJzoISnXktFqripf50oQ26yq6rTEnXd3/kJ+yD j3pOenuDwcxZ/SA+rd+tYVZb9/uJaLf/pum6HkNr86K4X315N+fy927vO0wN56GsQBot QfEg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xNnkFuIiwosvTG0MFVgd92UVhPCpniLLLTRIMaqsBYY=; b=nJjT3krroyG4JTYRUh9yDGLxYrEbJ6DBSYNxXHiQLdMi6kyPvkKHOWMReWxEAzUNx7 fbjq9u/Gt/WnYZ+2nFjuY8fTStLpqBpiISyk3q4UdPDsWHTyDhAW4OYJt6lu2vCdjori N3RDBGB39t4QrOzSR/p0Zb/3bc5aTnfBzccQU10YtCErmbJWGO2z6ztm56hgoTWCznkF ik+APkmXyl1Bf1A32jNRkxIxf/U0c6ANQpIF4x/5LTWlaUCsK//wnsNZgpLQL0+IZXVT 7yMpI3PHyakRPATPpvtB5trA1OkyU8BAVvTpGLECWQUV8jikiawr39no3pnkmr/DIv/G Cv+A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPBuOucHQhkWX/rbTtkiwLJqMcBuBJ1dUPfcDBEexMhhb3MbDvGd kFT48ZRszNv15Xmy5FgqYK597ydalskH6BYGVDkCTg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225Oy2eEURWucGJUo1FGayKLDHJlUrI9J0eOdEatekXaCg1A4oLjMuFrb1eB8navhJvkbsb5BQVOacCp9H6o7mE=
X-Received: by with SMTP id u131mr11017070pgb.103.1518486045043; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:40:45 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by with HTTP; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 17:40:44 -0800 (PST)
From: Vishnu Pavan Beeram <vishnupavan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 20:40:44 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+YzgTuFxWzxjo+UTVwWWXqbocTfjibu9o9F6_Fr=Wiit9tELQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Rakesh Gandhi (rgandhi)" <rgandhi@cisco.com>, "Shah, Himanshu" <hshah@ciena.com>, jeremy.whittaker@verizon.com
Cc: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>, TEAS WG Chairs <teas-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c1105484fb24705650e1502"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/qeSHglFQ88a2GPBrgTq47n45knc>
Subject: [Teas] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-teas-assoc-corouted-bidir-frr-02
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 01:40:48 -0000

Authors, Contributors, WG,

As part of the preparation for WG Last Call:

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?

If yes to the above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
stage until a response has been received from each author and listed

If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above

Thank you,
TEAS WG Chairs

PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your