Re: [Teas] I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects-01.txt

[Dhruv Dhody <[e-mail]>]

Hi WG,

Based on the comments received during the PCE WG LC of the companion
document, the TEAS I-D is also updated. During the update we have tried to
also check as per the guidelines in the wiki (
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/teas/trac/wiki/PSGuidelines).

Summary of the changes -

- A section "scope" added to describe the experiment
- 2119 language corrections
- Correction in the Length field for ISIS subobject
- Handling of unknown subobject (as per the existing specifications)
- Update in IANA consideration
- Changes in the References
- Changes in the examples (appendix)

Please check the diff at -
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects-01

Thanks!
Dhruv (on behalf of co-authors)

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:33 PM, <[e-mail]> wrote:

>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
>  This draft is a work item of the Traffic Engineering Architecture and
> Signaling Working Group of the IETF.
>
>         Title           : Domain Subobjects for Resource ReserVation
> Protocol - Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE)
>         Authors         : Dhruv Dhody
>                           Udayasree Palle
>                           Venugopal Reddy Kondreddy
>                           Ramon Casellas
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects-01.txt
>         Pages           : 16
>         Date            : 2015-04-30
>
> Abstract:
>    The Resource ReserVation Protocol - Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE)
>    specification and the Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching
>    (GMPLS) extensions to RSVP-TE allow abstract nodes and resources to
>    be explicitly included in a path setup.  Further Exclude Routes
>    extensions to RSVP-TE allow abstract nodes and resources to be
>    explicitly excluded in a path setup.
>
>    This document specifies new subobjects to include or exclude domains
>    during path setup where domain is a collection of network elements
>    within a common sphere of address management or path computational
>    responsibility (such as an Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) area or an
>    Autonomous System (AS)).  Note that the use of AS as an abstract node
>    representing domain is already defined in existing RSVP-TE
>    specefications, albeit with a 2-Byte AS number.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects/
>
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects-01
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects-01
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas
>