Re: [Teas] the relationship VN and VPN

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Sat, 01 August 2020 07:03 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 966943A07F0 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 00:03:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vc8z7Z225E_f for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 00:03:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F04223A07EC for <teas@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 00:03:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.19] (unknown [122.2.101.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1F9D9326D34; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 09:03:40 +0200 (CEST)
To: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
References: <30b4c711-ee04-4258-8f98-16e2cab1a4e0@pi.nu> <HE1PR07MB41565637DBD42ACFCB59FAAAF04E0@HE1PR07MB4156.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Message-ID: <dfd391a3-4841-dad6-1c9b-43a37c290612@pi.nu>
Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2020 15:03:34 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR07MB41565637DBD42ACFCB59FAAAF04E0@HE1PR07MB4156.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/rweikoUD7aBaRlYi6b7VWcDBySo>
Subject: Re: [Teas] the relationship VN and VPN
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2020 07:03:47 -0000

Daniele,

Does that mean that every VPN has an VN underlay?

/Loa

On 31/07/2020 21:11, Daniele Ceccarelli wrote:
> Hi Loa,
> 
> You can look at the VN as a collection of TE tunnels/LSPs to connect multiple end points possibly through multiple domains/autonomous systems.
> The relationship is overlay (VPN) versus underlay (VN).
> 
> Cheers,
> Daniele
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Teas <teas-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Loa Andersson
> Sent: den 31 juli 2020 13:45
> To: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
> Subject: [Teas] the relationship VN and VPN
> 
> WG,
> 
> Probably revealing that I have not followed this for some time.
> 
> What is the relationship between Virtual Network (VN) and Virtual Private Network (VPN).
> 
> Is a VPN a VN ??
> 
> 
> /Loa
> 

-- 

Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64