[Teas] RSVP-TE text in draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Wed, 06 July 2022 21:19 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: teas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F5A5C15A742 for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 14:19:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AC_DIV_BONANZA=0.001, BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_OBFU_JPG_ATTACH=0.01, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dy1pBqai8eSK for <teas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 14:19:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta6.iomartmail.com (mta6.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B7F0C15AD24 for <teas@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 14:18:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (vs3.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.124]) by mta6.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 266LII4L010246; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 22:18:18 +0100
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 008B94604B; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 22:18:18 +0100 (BST)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D562F4604A; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 22:18:17 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs3.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 6 Jul 2022 22:18:17 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (93.197.bbplus.pte-ag1.dyn.plus.net [81.174.197.93] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 266LIG7A007849 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 6 Jul 2022 22:18:16 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Gyan Mishra' <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Cc: 'TEAS WG' <teas@ietf.org>
References: <165697222560.27478.2338137252302838593@ietfa.amsl.com> <049301d88ff2$701ff5f0$505fe1d0$@olddog.co.uk> <CABNhwV1yJX0uAriNsc4K8EuhFXqHAtHdNqu1prCzh+9UaFBp6Q@mail.gmail.com> <04e001d89058$216be2f0$6443a8d0$@olddog.co.uk> <CABNhwV24pqB8b-RhvQENNYHNegwc6kfRnt_uHiysawC38cdFtg@mail.gmail.com> <05cd01d89099$5fea0d40$1fbe27c0$@olddog.co.uk> <CABNhwV35t7+sStriKEQb3rtevsWKrKnZpMCkNoaz+tjSy4Q4tg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABNhwV35t7+sStriKEQb3rtevsWKrKnZpMCkNoaz+tjSy4Q4tg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2022 22:18:15 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <010301d8917d$e8c14770$ba43d650$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0104_01D89186.4A87AB40"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-gb
Thread-Index: AdiRfeGxUuaTInS9TbudAWjK/gHwRA==
X-Originating-IP: 81.174.197.93
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-27000.002
X-TM-AS-Result: No--39.997-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--39.997-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-27000.002
X-TMASE-Result: 10--39.997400-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: xW/rWe9iGUQHfPGlaQnYaimnWWELN2BVaDCzqDR7DPYAtH/ey8zRp2sF fPqDo4B1NBdORIzcI4aj9oZEw6IQxlNigAiuAZ60TVl1flCKEPpegGFizQVlhmRxn1Vy+rfvLgV 4H+AhXSw5Q+5OtQJCFYOaK7R6v2MMNgNt8XFlSSrOQNPbSnPLHeMobH1h01zilDt5PQMgj03+Aw 16GgqpO8bfXnIU86PRSpW4dTiIVhVzBKmvDTDpEUUUIbywgVRPlVHM/F6YkvQSJaKTykWnoe+mG lKiOL00Z28gEzxS4tIbFwgB/pTY690At+n19DkRHhrksawCaq1wKlYjOzXY1V3n+beqvEXMY+hZ W0x5Yxak86uMB98iNkqgqR2WgGdyXVxrmk5a/hiokiLCFurlL1K9xlSOuRoWfkuZtv/FS5pK02d FccjAvYkw72K99TmDgRXUy3f9jsTOFDEYTSdNXod/gi/Pxf7NzNY33yIEF4ZBHuVYxc8DW0/cRv j5stP6yZPX8JNqz0mvYAqwvbf+XnM1apkBWoAC1+eFZnMe0WB85pjA/x1xfsE5XPQnBzGXe2Ibg jv94hWRbaihAmSwdzParA7MCidrYMWCypuLSkIRciGGXuhXEkzs4u81P77plNbIBwEV/h548JM6 2B34Q7279by0UrblWFQNk4+HCoigfHz5rL2UAtQGnHQKZS9z5p1ddw6V4RtITEcvqjcF4LdqbJD pRLdqjNXA40eWkLouy+d2rXUBkptVVeKU/pCr8IMW9dkWZjJh5IuIaxTO+VTizEWrqKARUJ3tU6 BsTehzS/2P0PZNybZxTFYC0OZrPbQC5KNcQCVzWfuwtDmWXIkMuDBv/UrZaZGo0EeYG97UHQeTV DUrIhXCmyUFd4oZMEvZfGWieH8rN8z0HohG3v558CedkGIvIXptJJqT2TE=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/rx9rfq3WflUDYlvN0ee5CJiMbiM>
Subject: [Teas] RSVP-TE text in draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis
X-BeenThere: teas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <teas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/teas/>
List-Post: <mailto:teas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas>, <mailto:teas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2022 21:19:39 -0000

OK, Gyan.

 

Merged and polished gives us…

 

5.1.3.4.  RSVP-TE

 

   RSVP-TE is a protocol extension of RSVP (Section 5.1.3.2) for traffic

   engineering.  The base specification is found in [RFC3209].  RSVP-TE

   enables the establishment of traffic engineered MPLS LSPs (TE LSPs),

   using loose or strict paths, and taking into consideration network

   constraints such as available bandwidth.  The extension supports

   signaling LSPs on explicit paths that could be administratively

   specified, or computed by a suitable entity (such as a PCE,

   Section 5.1.3.11) based on QoS and policy requirements, taking into

   consideration the prevailing network state as advertised by IGP

   extension for ISIS in [RFC5305], for OSPFV2 in [RFC3630], and for

   OSPFv3 in [RFC5329].  RSVP-TE enables the reservation of resources

   (for example, bandwidth) along the path.

 

   RSVP-TE includes the ability to preempt LSP based on priorities, and

   uses link affinities to include or exclude links from the paths of

   LSPs.  The protocol is further extended to support Fast Reroute (FRR)

   [RFC4090], Diffserv [RFC4124], and bidirectional LSPs [RFC7551].

   RSVP-TE extensions for support for GMPLS (see Section 5.1.3.5 are

   specified in [RFC3473].

 

   Requirements for point-to-multipoint (P2MP) MPLS TE LSPs are

   documented in [RFC4461], and signaling protocol extensions for

   setting up P2MP MPLS TE LSPs via RSVP-TE is defined in [RFC4875]

   where a P2MP LSP is comprised of multiple source-to-leaf (S2L) sub-

   LSPs.  To determine the paths for P2MP LSPs, selection of the branch

   points (based on capabilities, network state, and policies) is key.

 

   RSVP-TE has evolved to provide real time dynamic metrics for path

   selection for low latency paths using extensions to ISIS [RFC7810]

   and OSPF [RFC7471] based on STAMP [RFC8972] and TWAMP [RFC5357]

   performance measurements.

 

   RSVP-TE has historically been used when bandwidth was constrained,

   however, as bandwidth has increased, RSVP-TE has developed into a

   bandwidth management tool to provide bandwidth efficiency and

   proactive resource management.

 

What do you think?

 

Thanks,

Adrian

 

From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> 
Sent: 05 July 2022 19:18
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
Cc: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Teas] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-18.txt

 

 

Hi Adrian

 

I was expanding on what you already had in 5.1.3.4  so I was thinking you could just add on / integrate into what you already have.

 

Thanks 

 

Gyan

 

On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 2:02 PM Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk <mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk> > wrote:

Thanks Gyan,

 

Do you propose that that replace Section 5.1.3.4 or should I try to integrate it?

 

Cheers,

Adrian

 

From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com <mailto:hayabusagsm@gmail.com> > 
Sent: 05 July 2022 18:17
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk <mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk> 
Cc: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org <mailto:teas@ietf.org> >
Subject: Re: [Teas] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-18.txt

 

 

Hi Adrian 

 

Text below:

 

RSVP-TE enables the instantiation of static MPLS LSP loose hops, strict hops or a dynamic LSP using IGP extension for ISIS RFC 5305, OSPFV2 extension RFC 3630 and OSPFv3 extension RFC 5329 for cSPF (constrained SPF) Traffic Engineering database (TED) using static TE metrics.  RSVP-TE has now evolved to provide real time dynamic metrics for path selection using RSVP-TE ISIS extension RFC 7810 and RSVP-TE OSPF extension RFC 7471 based on IPPM STAMP RFC 8972 and TWAMP RFC 5357 performance measurements for low latency paths. RSVP-TE provides traffic  management capabilities with ECN style congestion notification using setup and hold RSVP-TE LSP priorities allowing the ability to preempt LSPs based on traffic class as well as re-optimization fallback to primary path.  Traffic management features have been enhanced significantly with newer hardware and software capabilities.  RSVP-TE provides link affinity bits to provide a method to include or exclude links from TED database for cSPF dynamic LSP instantiation. RSVP-TE provides Fast Reroute (FRR) pre signaled Make before break (MBB) link, node and path protection from Point of Local Repair (PLR) to Merge Point (MP) with FRR extension RFC 4090, yielding approximately 50ms restoration time for both P2P and P2MP RSVP-TE tunnels.  RSVP-TE supports Inter-AS TE with ISIS extension RFC 5316 and OSPF extension RFC 5392 and Inter Domain MPLS and GMPLS RSVP-TE extension RFC 5151.

 

RSVP-TE has historically been used when bandwidth was constrained, however as bandwidth has increased exponentially over the years, RSVP-TE has evolved into a bandwidth management tool to provide bandwidth efficiency and proactive resource management.

 

Thanks 

 

Gyan

 

On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 6:15 AM Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk <mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk> > wrote:

OK. Thanks.

 

A

 

From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com <mailto:hayabusagsm@gmail.com> > 
Sent: 04 July 2022 23:50
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk <mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk> 
Cc: TEAS WG <teas@ietf.org <mailto:teas@ietf.org> >
Subject: Re: [Teas] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-18.txt

 

Hi Adrian

 

I am working on some text to Dons questions as well as additional RSVP-TE related details to the new section created.

 

Thanks 

 

Gyan

 

On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 6:07 PM Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk <mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk> > wrote:

OK.

We now have a small Appendix section to cover CR-LDP.

Does anyone else have a further proposal to address Don's comments or are we
done?

Cheers,
Adrian

-----Original Message-----
From: I-D-Announce <i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org> > On Behalf Of
internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org> 
Sent: 04 July 2022 23:04
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org> 
Cc: teas@ietf.org <mailto:teas@ietf.org> 
Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-18.txt


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
This draft is a work item of the Traffic Engineering Architecture and
Signaling WG of the IETF.

        Title           : Overview and Principles of Internet Traffic
Engineering
        Author          : Adrian Farrel
  Filename        : draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-18.txt
  Pages           : 97
  Date            : 2022-07-04

Abstract:
   This document describes the principles of traffic engineering (TE) in
   the Internet.  The document is intended to promote better
   understanding of the issues surrounding traffic engineering in IP
   networks and the networks that support IP networking, and to provide
   a common basis for the development of traffic engineering
   capabilities for the Internet.  The principles, architectures, and
   methodologies for performance evaluation and performance optimization
   of operational networks are also discussed.

   This work was first published as RFC 3272 in May 2002.  This document
   obsoletes RFC 3272 by making a complete update to bring the text in
   line with best current practices for Internet traffic engineering and
   to include references to the latest relevant work in the IETF.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis/

There is also an htmlized version available at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-18

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-teas-rfc3272bis-18


Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at
rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts


_______________________________________________
I-D-Announce mailing list
I-D-Announce@ietf.org <mailto:I-D-Announce@ietf.org> 
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt

_______________________________________________
Teas mailing list
Teas@ietf.org <mailto:Teas@ietf.org> 
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas

-- 

 <http://www.verizon.com/> 

Gyan Mishra

Network Solutions Architect 

Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <mailto:gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com> 

M 301 502-1347

 

-- 

 <http://www.verizon.com/> 

Gyan Mishra

Network Solutions Architect 

Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <mailto:gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com> 

M 301 502-1347

 

-- 

 <http://www.verizon.com/> 

Gyan Mishra

Network Solutions Architect 

Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <mailto:gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com> 

M 301 502-1347