Re: [Teas] WG adoption of draft-king-teas-applicability-actn-slicing

Lou Berger <> Sat, 29 August 2020 18:55 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FED83A0F1A for <>; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 11:55:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.848
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.948, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06MjUkYfkSR6 for <>; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 11:55:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4F503A0F13 for <>; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 11:55:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (unknown []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D07571404ED for <>; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 12:55:38 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from ([]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id C60okuJjCpSV4C60okIuWx; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 12:55:38 -0600
X-Authority-Reason: nr=8
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=OqxhNR3t c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:17 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10:nop_ipv6 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10:nop_charset_1 a=y4yBn9ojGxQA:10:nop_rcvd_month_year a=Vy_oeq2dmq0A:10:endurance_base64_authed_username_1 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=OzQV7XzE9u3UUz2YSKgA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10:nop_charset_2 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version :Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=vETNexo534p9yydubNRmyYqO7gtAVuMhHgx2873K+WU=; b=0eQWbwWyskmDQjTDFZUuPk6CGh 4eza0RDkjqxNIZuG+XQMXJYoIf4oxnMpstgbuoRIECQsUaBE+5xOu+pjS+cuV75yg91I2YmOLEADQ vkonrkt5GfvAEYPNYcplonv3c;
Received: from [] (port=36627 helo=[IPv6:::1]) by with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <>) id 1kC60o-003Gjs-Jn; Sat, 29 Aug 2020 12:55:38 -0600
Cc: 'TEAS WG Chairs' <>
References: <05b401d67d8a$4ddf5890$e99e09b0$>
From: Lou Berger <>
Message-ID: <>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 14:55:35 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <05b401d67d8a$4ddf5890$e99e09b0$>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname -
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain -
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain -
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-L: Yes
X-Exim-ID: 1kC60o-003Gjs-Jn
X-Source-Sender: ([IPv6:::1]) []:36627
X-Email-Count: 13
X-Source-Cap: bGFibm1vYmk7bGFibm1vYmk7Ym94MzEzLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: yes
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Teas] WG adoption of draft-king-teas-applicability-actn-slicing
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Traffic Engineering Architecture and Signaling working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2020 18:55:42 -0000

Hi Adrian,

On 8/28/2020 6:26 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> ...
> Looking forward to your thoughts on this.

     As we (chairs) mentioned to you off-list, before we can talk about 
adoption of this document we still have the issue of working through the 
discussion at the last meeting.  Specifically the text that was removed 
from the WG document ( draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn) that is largely 
present in this document.  My question is: assuming the text in is 
restored from draft-ietf-teas-enhanced-vpn-05, are there one or more 
suitable existing (or candidate) WG documents that could be a home for 
the remaining valuable text that is currently in 
applicability-actn-slicing document? -- after all how many information 
documents do we really need on this topic....

I think this is a question not only for you and your coauthors, but also 
for the WG as a whole.



> Best,
> Adrian
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list